Head-to-head Updated

Falken FK510 SUV vs Nexen N'Fera RU1 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 3 + 3 road tests and 9 + 28 owner reviews. How we score

FK510 SUV is ahead, 71–65

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken FK510 SUV
Tire AFalken

FK510 SUV

Summer

± 6

Tests 78 · 3 tests Owners 64 · 9 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test (dry braking)

Nexen N'Fera RU1
Tire BNexen

N'Fera RU1

Summer

± 8

Tests 61 · 3 tests Owners 67 · 28 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 75

    Dry

    FK510 SUV +16
    59
    Why this score
    SourceFK510 SUVN'Fera RU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 3 tests8254
    Reviews found online6566

    FK510 SUV: 60% × 82.1 + 40% × 65.1 = 75

    N'Fera RU1: 60% × 54.2 + 40% × 65.9 = 59

  2. 77

    Wet

    FK510 SUV +9
    68
    Why this score
    SourceFK510 SUVN'Fera RU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 3 tests8167
    Reviews found online7270

    FK510 SUV: 60% × 80.7 + 40% × 71.7 = 77

    N'Fera RU1: 60% × 67 + 40% × 70.3 = 68

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    67
    Why this score
    SourceFK510 SUVN'Fera RU1
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online–65

    N'Fera RU1: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 65.4 = 67

    No road tests of snow for N'Fera RU1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 61

    Comfort

    N'Fera RU1 +4
    65
    Why this score
    SourceFK510 SUVN'Fera RU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests61≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6063

    FK510 SUV: 40% × 61.2 + 60% × 60.4 = 61

    N'Fera RU1: 40% × 67.6 (est.) + 60% × 63 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for N'Fera RU1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 71

    Noise

    FK510 SUV +4
    67
    Why this score
    SourceFK510 SUVN'Fera RU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 1 tests7467
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)68

    FK510 SUV: 60% × 73.9 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 71

    N'Fera RU1: 60% × 67.3 + 40% × 67.7 = 67

    No owner ratings of noise for FK510 SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 60

    Treadwear

    N'Fera RU1 +7
    67
    Why this score
    SourceFK510 SUVN'Fera RU1
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5567

    FK510 SUV: 60% × 62.6 (est.) + 40% × 55.4 = 60

    N'Fera RU1: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.4 = 67

    No road tests of treadwear for FK510 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for N'Fera RU1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 67

    Handling (owners)

    FK510 SUV +2
    65
    Why this score
    SourceFK510 SUVN'Fera RU1
    Reviews found online6765
  8. 44

    Efficiency

    N'Fera RU1 +8
    52
    Why this score
    SourceFK510 SUVN'Fera RU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 1 tests4452
Scores at a glance
Falken FK510 SUV vs Nexen N'Fera RU1: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken FK510 SUVNexen N'Fera RU1
Relative Score 71 65
Dry 75 59
Wet 77 68
Snow – 67
Comfort 61 65
Noise 71 67
Treadwear 60 67
Handling (owners) 67 65
Efficiency 44 52

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

FK510 SUV

± 8

N'Fera RU1

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryFK510 SUVN'Fera RU1ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 100% #1/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 93% #7/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 100% #1/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 98% #7/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 96% #6/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 95% #10/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 100% #1/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 90% #7/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 100% #1/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 98% #8/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Noise Noise 98% #10/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 97% #6/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 76% #10/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 74% #10/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 74% #7/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 77% #3/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Grass Traction Off-road 92% #9/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 91% #7/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Gravel Handling Off-road 100% #2/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 97% #8/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Gravel Traction Off-road 95% #3/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 97% #2/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Mud Traction Off-road 74% #10/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 88% #7/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall #3/10 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test #8/10 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A FK510 SUV

Pros

  • Excellent value for money compared to top-tier premium brands
  • Quiet, compliant, and comfortable ride quality
  • Strong dry and wet handling with good feedback

Cons

  • Accelerated or uneven tread wear on certain vehicle setups
  • Reduced fuel economy (MPG)
  • Some users reported poor traction and slipping in wet or moisture conditions
All owner themes in the FK510 SUV review

Tire B N'Fera RU1

Pros

  • Exceptional value for money compared to premium tier brands
  • High level of ride comfort and impact absorption over rough roads
  • Low road noise and quiet highway cruising

Cons

  • Faster-than-expected tread wear or chipping reported by some users
  • Softer sidewalls can lead to reduced steering feedback and vague high-speed handling
  • Mixed performance in colder temperatures or under hard acceleration
All owner themes in the N'Fera RU1 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken FK510 SUV B · Nexen N'Fera RU1
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available4845
Rim diameters17″ – 22″16″ – 20″
Tread depth—10/32″
UTQG—320 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi
Sizes in common2222

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken FK510 SUV

Nexen N'Fera RU1

Winner: Falken FK510 SUV — better dry, wet and noise. Pick the Nexen N'Fera RU1 if efficiency, treadwear and comfort matter most to you.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Falken FK510 SUV scores 75 vs 59 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken FK510 SUV scores 77 vs 68 on wet.

Pick tire B You want lower fuel or energy use

Nexen N'Fera RU1 scores 52 vs 44 on efficiency.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Nexen N'Fera RU1 scores 67 vs 60 on treadwear.

Tire A · Falken FK510 SUV
Tire B · Nexen N'Fera RU1

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

FK510 SUV or N'Fera RU1?

Which is better in the wet, FK510 SUV or N'Fera RU1?

Falken FK510 SUV, 77 vs 68 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, FK510 SUV or N'Fera RU1?

Falken FK510 SUV, 75 vs 59 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, FK510 SUV or N'Fera RU1?

Falken FK510 SUV, 71 vs 67 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, FK510 SUV or N'Fera RU1?

Nexen N'Fera RU1, 65 vs 61 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, FK510 SUV or N'Fera RU1?

Nexen N'Fera RU1, 67 vs 60 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, FK510 SUV or N'Fera RU1?

Nexen N'Fera RU1, 52 vs 44 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology