Tests – · none yet Owners 78 · 100 reviews
Falken ZE914 vs Goodyear Assurance Triplemax 2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 100 + 30 owner reviews. How we score
ZE914 is ahead, 75–63
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 61 · 30 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
76
Dry
ZE914 +1264Why this score
Source ZE914 Assurance Triplemax 2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 81 61 ZE914: 60% × 73.2 (est.) + 40% × 80.6 = 76
Assurance Triplemax 2: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 61.4 = 64
No road tests of dry for ZE914. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Assurance Triplemax 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
77
Wet
ZE914 +1265Why this score
Source ZE914 Assurance Triplemax 2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 75 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 79 63 ZE914: 60% × 75.5 (est.) + 40% × 79.4 = 77
Assurance Triplemax 2: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 63.1 = 65
No road tests of wet for ZE914. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Assurance Triplemax 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
73
Comfort
ZE914 +1459Why this score
Source ZE914 Assurance Triplemax 2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 74 55 ZE914: 40% × 69.8 (est.) + 60% × 74.4 = 73
Assurance Triplemax 2: 40% × 65.9 (est.) + 60% × 55.2 = 59
No road tests of comfort for ZE914. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Assurance Triplemax 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
72
Treadwear
ZE914 +864Why this score
Source ZE914 Assurance Triplemax 2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 76 62 ZE914: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 76 = 72
Assurance Triplemax 2: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 62.3 = 64
No road tests of treadwear for ZE914. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Assurance Triplemax 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
77
Handling (owners)
ZE914 +1859Why this score
Source ZE914 Assurance Triplemax 2 Reviews found online 77 59
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken ZE914 | Goodyear Assurance Triplemax 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 63 |
| Dry | 76 | 64 |
| Wet | 77 | 65 |
| Comfort | 73 | 59 |
| Treadwear | 72 | 64 |
| Handling (owners) | 77 | 59 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ZE914
Assurance Triplemax 2
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ZE914
Pros
- Exceptional value for money compared to premium competitors
- Strong, predictable grip in both dry and wet conditions
- Progressive handling characteristics that provide driver confidence
Cons
- Reports of increased road noise, particularly as the tread wears down
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users experiencing premature wear
- Occasional reports of poor wet-weather traction on specific high-torque or lightweight sports vehicles
Tire B Assurance Triplemax 2
Pros
- Superb dry and wet grip when new
- Excellent aquaplaning resistance and handling during heavy rain
- Good value for money compared to premium competitors
Cons
- Becomes significantly noisier as the tread wears down
- Stiff sidewalls leading to a harsh or crashy ride over rough surfaces
- Decline in wet grip and performance as the tire ages or wears past 50%
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken ZE914 | B · Goodyear Assurance Triplemax 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 4 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 17″ |
| UTQG | 320 A - B A | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Falken ZE914
Goodyear Assurance Triplemax 2
Winner: Falken ZE914 — better handling, comfort and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Falken ZE914 scores 77 vs 59 on handling.
Falken ZE914 scores 73 vs 59 on comfort.
Falken ZE914 scores 76 vs 64 on dry.
Falken ZE914 scores 77 vs 65 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ZE914 or Assurance Triplemax 2?
Which is better in the wet, ZE914 or Assurance Triplemax 2?
Falken ZE914, 77 vs 65 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ZE914 or Assurance Triplemax 2?
Falken ZE914, 76 vs 64 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, ZE914 or Assurance Triplemax 2?
Falken ZE914, 73 vs 59 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ZE914 or Assurance Triplemax 2?
Falken ZE914, 72 vs 64 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology