Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 86 reviews
General Grabber AT2 vs BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 86 + 1,586 owner reviews. How we score
All-Terrain T/A KO2 leads, 71–67 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 1,586 reviews
“I like mine so much I'm on my second set. I got 55k out of my first set (could have got another 10k but started to get a little noisy). Exact tire you have (265/70-17 C load) on a 2018 4Runner.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
66
Dry
All-Terrain T/A KO2 +571Why this score
Source Grabber AT2 All-Terrain T/A KO2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 65 73 Grabber AT2: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.8 = 66
All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 73.4 = 71
No road tests of dry for Grabber AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
63
Wet
All-Terrain T/A KO2 +770Why this score
Source Grabber AT2 All-Terrain T/A KO2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 60 70 Grabber AT2: 60% × 64.8 (est.) + 40% × 59.9 = 63
All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 70.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.2 = 70
No road tests of wet for Grabber AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
71
Snow
All-Terrain T/A KO2 +374Why this score
Source Grabber AT2 All-Terrain T/A KO2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 71 76 Grabber AT2: 60% × 70.6 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 71
All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 72.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.8 = 74
No road tests of snow for Grabber AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
69
Comfort
Grabber AT2 +168Why this score
Source Grabber AT2 All-Terrain T/A KO2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 69 68 Grabber AT2: 40% × 68.7 (est.) + 60% × 69 = 69
All-Terrain T/A KO2: 40% × 68.6 (est.) + 60% × 68.4 = 68
No road tests of comfort for Grabber AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
64
Noise
All-Terrain T/A KO2 +569Why this score
Source Grabber AT2 All-Terrain T/A KO2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 60 72 Grabber AT2: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 60.4 = 64
All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 69
No road tests of noise for Grabber AT2 or All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
73
Treadwear
Level73Why this score
Source Grabber AT2 All-Terrain T/A KO2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 78 77 Grabber AT2: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 77.6 = 73
All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 76.5 = 73
No road tests of treadwear for Grabber AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
61
Handling (owners)
All-Terrain T/A KO2 +566Why this score
Source Grabber AT2 All-Terrain T/A KO2 Reviews found online 61 66
Scores at a glance
| Category | General Grabber AT2 | BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 71 |
| Dry | 66 | 71 |
| Wet | 63 | 70 |
| Snow | 71 | 74 |
| Comfort | 69 | 68 |
| Noise | 64 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 73 | 73 |
| Handling (owners) | 61 | 66 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Grabber AT2
All-Terrain T/A KO2
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Grabber AT2
Pros
- Excellent off-road grip in mud, sand, and dirt
- Impressively low road noise for an aggressive all-terrain tread pattern
- Long-lasting tread life and durability
Cons
- Subpar or dangerous wet-weather and wet-tarmac grip reported by some users
- Thin sidewalls susceptible to punctures from sharp rocks during serious off-roading
- Tendency for some tires to go out of shape or cup over time, causing increased noise
Tire B All-Terrain T/A KO2
Pros
- Exceptional off-road traction and puncture resistance on rocks, gravel, and dirt
- Aggressive, rugged aesthetics that enhance the look of trucks and SUVs
- Impressive tread longevity and high mileage capabilities
Cons
- Reduced grip and slippery performance in wet conditions, rain, and standing water
- Rubber tends to harden over time, negatively impacting cold-weather and ice traction
- Higher price point compared to some competitors
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
General Grabber AT2
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2
Community sentiment toward the BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 is largely positive, with drivers frequently praising its aggressive styling, tough sidewalls, off-road durability, and solid general performance. Many owners report capable handling in snow, though several emphasize that it cannot replace a dedicated winter tire and can struggle on ice or packed snow. Criticisms center on high pricing, added weight hurting fuel economy, mud packing, occasional tread chunking, and difficulties with balancing causing highway vibrations.
“I have ran both of those options in the past all on half ton trucks. Like other have said a lot depends on what you will use your truck for but for me the all around comfort and off road/winter performance would go to Falken. The KO2 for me had a harsher ride obviously because it's a 8 ply D rate tire. The KO2 also seems to wear fast initially and then i don't know if the rubber compound changed or what but it became hard and noisy but did last a really long time. The Falken were quieter and better riding through out the entire life of the tire. They only thing i would suggest is go to a reputable tire store and have them road force balance. I ran two sets of Falkens on previous trucks with no issues but when i tried to put them on my current 22' F150 i went through 7 different tires and they still couldn't get them to balance properly so i just sent them back and put some Yokohama G015 AT's on it. I'm not sure if it was an issue with the balancer at the shop i was at, their distributor sending them crappy tires, or a bad run of tires from Falken but i would definitely pay the extra to have them road force balanced. Good luck with choosing a tire!”
“2019 zr2 Duratracs were a good tire. Only complaint was the last 10k of their life they got LOUD on the pavement. Good in snow, good on trails. Went to KO2s when it was time for new shoes. Like the stronger side walls and rating, better traction in hard dirt, no real difference in loose rocks or winter to me. Definitely harsher ride w the stiffer sidewalls. I have the ZR2 now as a 2nd rig (finally) so it doesn’t get daily miles. I’d purchase the KO2s again. Daily driver? Duratracs are better, but that horrid drone the last 10k of life would be enough for me to pass on them. 🍻”
“No opinion here between the Yokohamas or Falkens (both of which I would definitely put on my Outback ) but in my experience the BFG KOs are way too much tire for the Outback . I put a set of 4 on my 2013 Outback and quickly discovered that other than looking great, and being virtually bulletproof, everything else about them is a downside. Rough ride, lot of road noise, lost about 2 mpg in fuel cost, and very heavy when I did my tire rotations, which BFG says you should do every 3,000 miles to prevent excess wear. Like they say about many things, the two happiest days in my 2013 Outback ’s life were the day I put the KO2s on, and the day, after about 10,000 miles, I replaced them with “regular” tires . Great tires for a heavier vehicle, but too much for the relatively light Outback . I’ve read many Outback owner’s reviews being very happy with the Wildpeaks AND Geolanders. Sounds like that person has an agenda.”
Based on 395 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · General Grabber AT2 | B · BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 2 | 49 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 14/32″ | 13 - 15/32″ |
| UTQG | 640 A B | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 60,000 mi | 50,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Outlined White Lettering | Black Side Wall - Raised White Lettering |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | 35 - 80 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
General Grabber AT2
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2
Narrow edge: BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 — better wet, dry and noise. Where the General Grabber AT2 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 scores 70 vs 63 on wet.
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 scores 71 vs 66 on dry.
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 scores 69 vs 64 on noise.
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 scores 74 vs 71 on snow.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Grabber AT2 or All-Terrain T/A KO2?
Which is better in the wet, Grabber AT2 or All-Terrain T/A KO2?
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 70 vs 63 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Grabber AT2 or All-Terrain T/A KO2?
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 71 vs 66 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Grabber AT2 or All-Terrain T/A KO2?
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 74 vs 71 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Grabber AT2 or All-Terrain T/A KO2?
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 69 vs 64 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Grabber AT2 or All-Terrain T/A KO2?
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 68 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Grabber AT2 or All-Terrain T/A KO2?
Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 73 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology