tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

General Grabber AT2 vs Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 86 + 186 owner reviews. How we score

DynaPro A/TM RF10 leads, 71–68 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Grabber AT2 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

General Grabber AT2
Tire AGeneral

Grabber AT2

All-Terrain tire

Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 86 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 67

    Dry

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +6
    73
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber AT2DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online6777

    Grabber AT2: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 66.7 = 67

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73

    No road tests of dry for Grabber AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 66

    Wet

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +8
    74
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber AT2DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online6475

    Grabber AT2: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 64 = 66

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74

    No road tests of wet for Grabber AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 70

    Snow

    Grabber AT2 +5
    65
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber AT2DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7162

    Grabber AT2: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 70

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.6 = 65

    No road tests of snow for Grabber AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 69

    Comfort

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +3
    72
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber AT2DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7075

    Grabber AT2: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 69.5 = 69

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 72

    No road tests of comfort for Grabber AT2 or DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 66

    Noise

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +4
    70
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber AT2DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6373

    Grabber AT2: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 62.9 = 66

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70

    No road tests of noise for Grabber AT2 or DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 70

    Treadwear

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +1
    71
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber AT2DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7475

    Grabber AT2: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 73.7 = 70

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 71

    No road tests of treadwear for Grabber AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 65

    Handling (owners)

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +6
    71
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber AT2DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Reviews found online6571
Scores at a glance
CategoryGeneral Grabber AT2Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Relative Score 68 71
Dry 67 73
Wet 66 74
Snow 70 65
Comfort 69 72
Noise 66 70
Treadwear 70 71
Handling (owners) 65 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Grabber AT2

DynaPro A/TM RF10

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Grabber AT2

Pros

  • Excellent off-road grip in mud, sand, and dirt
  • Impressively low road noise for an aggressive all-terrain tread pattern
  • Long-lasting tread life and durability

Cons

  • Subpar or dangerous wet-weather and wet-tarmac grip reported by some users
  • Thin sidewalls susceptible to punctures from sharp rocks during serious off-roading
  • Tendency for some tires to go out of shape or cup over time, causing increased noise
All owner themes in the Grabber AT2 review

Tire B DynaPro A/TM RF10

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Low road noise compared to other all-terrain tires
  • Strong value proposition and competitive pricing

Cons

  • Inconsistent traction on wet pavement and ice
  • Reports of sidewall vulnerability to punctures
  • Potential for increased fuel consumption
All owner themes in the DynaPro A/TM RF10 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · General Grabber AT2 B · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
CategoryAll-Terrain tireAll-Terrain tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available229
Rim diameters16″15″ – 20″
Tread depth14/32″13/32″
UTQG640 A B560 A B
Treadwear warranty60,000 mi50,000 mi
SidewallOutlined White LetteringOutlined White Lettering
Max pressure44 psi44 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

General Grabber AT2

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10

Narrow edge: Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — better wet, dry and handling. Pick the General Grabber AT2 if snow matters most to you.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 74 vs 66 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 73 vs 67 on dry.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 71 vs 65 on handling.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

General Grabber AT2 scores 70 vs 65 on snow.

Tire A · General Grabber AT2
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Grabber AT2 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Which is better in the wet, Grabber AT2 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 74 vs 66 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Grabber AT2 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 73 vs 67 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Grabber AT2 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

General Grabber AT2, 70 vs 65 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Grabber AT2 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 70 vs 66 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Grabber AT2 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 72 vs 69 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Grabber AT2 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 71 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology