Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 86 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
General Grabber AT2 vs Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 86 + 1,627 owner reviews. How we score
Geolandar A/T G015 is ahead, 74–67
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 73 · 2 tests Owners 77 · 1,627 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2018 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test (noise)
“I put the G015 ’s on y wife’s 2020 this spring but in 225/65r17. Saved the stock wheels for snow tires . No complaints with the tires . They are super quiet. Handle fine.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
66
Dry
Geolandar A/T G015 +975Why this score
Source Grabber AT2 Geolandar A/T G015 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 74 Reviews found online 65 77 Grabber AT2: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 65.4 = 66
Geolandar A/T G015: 60% × 73.6 + 40% × 77.1 = 75
No road tests of dry for Grabber AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
63
Wet
Geolandar A/T G015 +1073Why this score
Source Grabber AT2 Geolandar A/T G015 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 65 (est.) 69 Reviews found online 60 80 Grabber AT2: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 60.4 = 63
Geolandar A/T G015: 60% × 68.9 + 40% × 79.7 = 73
No road tests of wet for Grabber AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
71
Snow
Geolandar A/T G015 +475Why this score
Source Grabber AT2 Geolandar A/T G015 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 71 (est.) 77 Reviews found online 71 73 Grabber AT2: 60% × 70.9 (est.) + 40% × 71.1 = 71
Geolandar A/T G015: 60% × 76.6 + 40% × 73.4 = 75
No road tests of snow for Grabber AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
69
Comfort
Geolandar A/T G015 +675Why this score
Source Grabber AT2 Geolandar A/T G015 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 70 77 Grabber AT2: 40% × 69.2 (est.) + 60% × 69.6 = 69
Geolandar A/T G015: 40% × 70.7 (est.) + 60% × 77.4 = 75
No road tests of comfort for Grabber AT2 or Geolandar A/T G015. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
64
Noise
Geolandar A/T G015 +1377Why this score
Source Grabber AT2 Geolandar A/T G015 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 76 Reviews found online 61 78 Grabber AT2: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 60.7 = 64
Geolandar A/T G015: 60% × 75.8 + 40% × 77.9 = 77
No road tests of noise for Grabber AT2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
73
Treadwear
Grabber AT2 +172Why this score
Source Grabber AT2 Geolandar A/T G015 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 77 76 Grabber AT2: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 77.4 = 73
Geolandar A/T G015: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 75.9 = 72
No road tests of treadwear for Grabber AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar A/T G015. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
62
Handling (owners)
Geolandar A/T G015 +1274Why this score
Source Grabber AT2 Geolandar A/T G015 Reviews found online 62 74 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison57Why this score
Source Grabber AT2 Geolandar A/T G015 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 57
Scores at a glance
| Category | General Grabber AT2 | Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 74 |
| Dry | 66 | 75 |
| Wet | 63 | 73 |
| Snow | 71 | 75 |
| Comfort | 69 | 75 |
| Noise | 64 | 77 |
| Treadwear | 73 | 72 |
| Handling (owners) | 62 | 74 |
| Efficiency | – | 57 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
67
/ 100
Grabber AT2
74
/ 100
Geolandar A/T G015
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Grabber AT2
Pros
- Excellent off-road grip in mud, sand, and dirt
- Impressively low road noise for an aggressive all-terrain tread pattern
- Long-lasting tread life and durability
Cons
- Subpar or dangerous wet-weather and wet-tarmac grip reported by some users
- Thin sidewalls susceptible to punctures from sharp rocks during serious off-roading
- Tendency for some tires to go out of shape or cup over time, causing increased noise
Tire B Geolandar A/T G015
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather and rain traction
- Low road noise and smooth highway ride quality
- Strong performance in light snow and winter conditions (3PMSF rated)
Cons
- Struggles in deep, sticky mud and wet clay
- Some reports of faster tread wear or hardening rubber compound over time
- Softer sidewalls on certain specs can result in a slightly floaty or numb steering feel under heavy loads
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
General Grabber AT2
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015
Community sentiment toward the Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 is predominantly positive, with owners highlighting its quiet highway manners, strong snow and wet traction, and good light off-road capability. Criticisms primarily center around a slight 1–2 mpg fuel economy loss, potential ride harshness or softer P-rated sidewalls depending on vehicle application, and gravel retention in the tread. Many drivers consider it a balanced all-terrain tire suited for predominantly on-road daily driving with occasional trail use.
r/LexusGX
·1 upvote ·2026-09-24
“I switched to Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 265/65R18 114H SL BSW Corrected the speedometer (normally it reads under by a few MPH with the factory tires). They are AWESOME in heavy rain conditions and snow. AT tires, so they are slightly louder than the Defenders, but not by much. Slight rub on a hard turn, but you can replace the one bolt in each of the front wheel well trims and it's all better. They look great as well. Good luck!”
ramforum.com
·2016-06-01
“I may up the pressure to your suggestion - I'm running the door jamb recommended 39 PSI all around. I pick up little pebbles in the tread all day, every day, I notice. I have noticed a ~2 mpg loss on fuel economy, which really adds a lot to the "price" of the tires. Are you seeing any worse MPGs?”
r/4Runner
·2026-09-04
“Anyone here running Yokohama Geolandar A/T4 G018's? Any complaints or regrets (road noise, balancing issues, etc.), specifically in SL load? Currently have the Geolandar A/T G015's on my 4th gen and am considering the A/T4's next. All the real feedback (non-commercial reviews) I've been able find on here and other forums seem to be pretty old and mostly by people without a ton of miles on them. My use case is about 90% on road with the remaining 10% on mild to moderate trails. Not a rock crawler and never will be. The G015's in SL load have been pretty perfect but I've been thinking about changing to the A/T4's next for slightly better off road performance. Main concern (aside from weight, which is why I'm looking to stay with SL instead of C) is wet pavement safety since I drive my young kids pretty much daily. I only have a roof rack, so not too much added weight.”
Top themes
#Snow and winter traction#Highway road noise#Fuel economy impact#Ride comfort and sidewall stiffness#Off-road and trail capability#Sizing and fitment rubbing
Based on 30 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · General Grabber AT2 | B · Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 2 | 90 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 14/32″ | 11 - 18/32″ |
| UTQG | 640 A B | 360 - 600 A B |
| Treadwear warranty | 60,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Outlined White Lettering | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | 35 - 80 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
67
/ 100
General Grabber AT2
74
/ 100
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015
Winner: Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 — better noise, handling and wet. Where the General Grabber AT2 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 scores 77 vs 64 on noise.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 scores 74 vs 62 on handling.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 scores 73 vs 63 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 scores 75 vs 66 on dry.
Tire A · General Grabber AT2
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Grabber AT2 or Geolandar A/T G015?
Which is better in the wet, Grabber AT2 or Geolandar A/T G015?
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015, 73 vs 63 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Grabber AT2 or Geolandar A/T G015?
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015, 75 vs 66 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Grabber AT2 or Geolandar A/T G015?
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015, 75 vs 71 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Grabber AT2 or Geolandar A/T G015?
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015, 77 vs 64 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Grabber AT2 or Geolandar A/T G015?
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015, 75 vs 69 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Grabber AT2 or Geolandar A/T G015?
Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 72 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology