Head-to-head Updated

General Grabber HTS60 vs Hankook Dynapro AT2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 493 + 218 owner reviews. How we score

Grabber HTS60 is ahead, 76–56

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

General Grabber HTS60
Tire AGeneral

Grabber HTS60

All Season

± 7

Tests – · 1 test Owners 80 · 493 reviews

Best test result: #3 of 13 in 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires (tested tread life (miles))

“Hey guys, Turns out there's a puncture in one of my general grabbers and the shop is asking that I change all 4 at this point... When came the time to look at new tires, they advised me that these tires are simply Gerneral Grabber HTS60 tires...indicating that they aren't necessarily made different from any regular grabbers they would put on an ice truck. Can anybody confirm this? If so, has anybody tried a different all-season tire like the Michelin Defender LTX by any chance? Wondering if we'd be getting a huge hit in range... Thanks!”

Hankook Dynapro AT2
Tire BHankook

Dynapro AT2

All-Terrain tire

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 51 · 218 reviews

“New shoes for the Sunset Truck Hankook Dynapro AT2 Extremes in 30x9.5. Read more”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 76

    Dry

    Grabber HTS60 +20
    56
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber HTS60Dynapro AT2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online8050

    Grabber HTS60: 60% × 73 (est.) + 40% × 80.3 = 76

    Dynapro AT2: 60% × 60.6 (est.) + 40% × 50 = 56

    No road tests of dry for Grabber HTS60. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 78

    Wet

    Grabber HTS60 +20
    58
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber HTS60Dynapro AT2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 76 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online8154

    Grabber HTS60: 60% × 76.4 (est.) + 40% × 81.2 = 78

    Dynapro AT2: 60% × 61.5 (est.) + 40% × 53.9 = 58

    No road tests of wet for Grabber HTS60. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 72

    Snow

    Grabber HTS60 +11
    61
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber HTS60Dynapro AT2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7255

    Grabber HTS60: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 72.3 = 72

    Dynapro AT2: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 55.2 = 61

    No road tests of snow for Grabber HTS60. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 77

    Comfort

    Grabber HTS60 +25
    52
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber HTS60Dynapro AT2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online8145

    Grabber HTS60: 40% × 71 (est.) + 60% × 80.5 = 77

    Dynapro AT2: 40% × 63.9 (est.) + 60% × 44.9 = 52

    No road tests of comfort for Grabber HTS60. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 73

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber HTS60Dynapro AT2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online83–

    Grabber HTS60: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 83.4 = 73

    No road tests of noise for Grabber HTS60. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 77

    Treadwear

    Grabber HTS60 +22
    55
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber HTS60Dynapro AT2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests74≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online8348

    Grabber HTS60: 60% × 73.7 + 40% × 82.9 = 77

    Dynapro AT2: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 48.4 = 55

    No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 78

    Handling (owners)

    Grabber HTS60 +31
    47
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber HTS60Dynapro AT2
    Reviews found online7847
Scores at a glance
General Grabber HTS60 vs Hankook Dynapro AT2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGeneral Grabber HTS60Hankook Dynapro AT2
Relative Score 76 56
Dry 76 56
Wet 78 58
Snow 72 61
Comfort 77 52
Noise 73 –
Treadwear 77 55
Handling (owners) 78 47

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Grabber HTS60

± 8

Dynapro AT2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Grabber HTS60

Pros

  • Smooth and quiet highway ride quality
  • Great value and affordable price point compared to premium brands
  • Reliable all-season traction in wet, dry, and light winter conditions

Cons

  • Occasional reports of minor road noise or hum at higher speeds
  • Potential manufacturing inconsistencies, such as tires being out-of-round
  • Aggressive tread pattern can occasionally cause slight slippage on loose dirt or debris when taking off
All owner themes in the Grabber HTS60 review

Tire B Dynapro AT2

Pros

  • Comfortable ride quality on asphalt compared to standard summer or previous all-terrain models
  • Good traction and control in dry and wet weather conditions, including dependable trailer towing
  • Favorable fuel economy (MPGs) and low road noise for many users when new

Cons

  • Poor performance and lack of secure handling in snow, ice, and slush at highway speeds
  • Develops significant road noise or drumming as the tread wears down
  • Concerns regarding casing durability, including reports of premature cracking and vulnerability to gravel punctures
All owner themes in the Dynapro AT2 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

General Grabber HTS60

Positive

Community opinion of the General Grabber HTS 60 is largely positive, with owners highlighting its low price, quiet road manners, and strong fuel and electric efficiency compared to all-terrain alternatives. While widely praised as an affordable highway tire capable of light towing, some users note concerns regarding winter grip, wet hydroplaning at half tread, and isolated balance or sidewall defect issues.

ford-trucks.com

“Just noticed on one of the pics I took of the tire that the factory added about 10lbs of lead to balance it. Seems like they could have done a better job of that... I see the colored dot on the tire and got wondering what that meant. Found this tidbit of info out there: Quote: Where Are the Paint Dots Placed? Quote: The yellow dots identify where a tire weighs the least — the lightest point on a tire. The yellow dot should be lined up and directly next to the valve stem, which is the wheel’s heaviest point. The red dots identify where the tire is flattest — the lowest point on a tire. The red dot should be directly across from the highest point of the wheel, which is usually indicated by a colored dot or a notch on the wheel. If a tire has a yellow and red dot, the red dot takes precedence when balancing the tire. Wonder if the factory people bother to do that correctly?”

rivianforums.com ·2 upvotes ·2026-06-07

“The General Grabber HTS60 is the best value tire currently available for efficiency. While its treadwear is not class-leading, the tire is backed by a mileage warranty, helping offset replacement costs and making its lifetime cost of ownership very attractive. More importantly, numerous Rivian owner reports indicate the HTS60 delivers efficiency that is comparable to, and in some cases exceeds, the OEM 21-inch road tire while significantly outperforming the OEM 20-inch all-terrain tire. When combined with its low purchase price, light weight, quiet ride, and strong on-road manners, the HTS60 stands out as one of the lowest-cost options for achieving near-maximum efficiency.”

r/f150 ·32 upvotes ·2023-07-18

“New shoes today !! General Grabber HTS60 275/55/R20 117T Very good rated and $400 cheaper than the Michelins I wanted. Discount Tire price matched Sams Club since they were 2 weeks out.”

Top themes
#fuel and EV efficiency#budget-friendly pricing#quiet and smooth ride#highway and road performance#light towing capability#winter and wet traction#treadwear and balance issues

Based on 38 community posts

Tire B

Hankook Dynapro AT2

Mixed

Community sentiment for the Hankook Dynapro AT2 is divided, with frequent distinctions drawn between standard OEM versions and aftermarket or 'Xtreme' models. While drivers appreciate the tire's quiet highway ride, decent fuel economy, and competitive pricing, many criticize the base factory version for poor wet and winter traction as well as lack of genuine off-road capability. In contrast, the Dynapro AT2 Xtreme variant receives widespread praise for improved snow performance, durability, and aggressive styling.

f150gen14.com ·2 upvotes ·2025-10-21

“Factory tires are usually worse than what you normally purchase at a tire shop. Have seen it with every new vehicle. (I get a new work vehicle every 3-4 years) If you look up those Dynapro AT2s, you'll see they even have a different tread pattern for the ones that come with new F-150s vs what is reviewed/shown on Tirerack.com They are cheaper, made for mpg, and don't last. I replaced mine on my 2023 at 20K miles. We noticed the same thing on my wife's VW. Came with some lower-end goodyears that were replaced at 15K. Also, tread-wear warranty only applies to defects. If they wear out sooner, that generally isn't covered by any tire brand.”

f150lightningforum.com ·2025-03-08

“I’ve had the Hankook Dynapro AT2s on another truck and their Dynapro AS on my Expedition. Both were terrible, even dangerous. Got rid of them early on both vehicles. My Lightning came with the General Grabbers. The Grabbers are decent, actually handle snow and wet very well, but are worthless for slush and ice. They’re not good on dirt. But I’ve kept them on now for a bit over 2 years. I’ll be replacing them before next winter as it will be about time anyway. Definitely want to go with something a bit more aggressive or winter-capable, just not sure which tires as of yet. Can’t really afford to sacrifice any range… Maybe just a tiny bit is all.”

f150forum.com

“I had the Hankook AT2 on my 2019 from the factory and they were way better than the Pirelli's that came on my '15 and my '22 F-150 FX4 trucks. They may not be a true AT tire, but they gave me 50,000 miles and functioned well in MN winters as on road tire and did well enough on the small number of off road excursions they took me on while hunting ( half mile to mile dirt trails and across various set-aside agricultural fields).”

Top themes
#poor wet traction#quiet highway ride#OEM vs aftermarket differences#AT2 Xtreme praise#snow and ice performance#fuel efficiency and treadwear#mild off-road capability

Based on 47 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · General Grabber HTS60 B · Hankook Dynapro AT2
CategoryAll SeasonAll-Terrain tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available3933
Rim diameters15″ – 22″15″ – 20″
Tread depth10 - 14/32″—
UTQG620 - 680 A A - B440 - 660 A A - B
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering—
Max pressure44 - 80 psi—
Sizes in common1515

Which one should you actually buy?

General Grabber HTS60

Hankook Dynapro AT2

Winner: General Grabber HTS60 — better handling, comfort and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

General Grabber HTS60 scores 78 vs 47 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

General Grabber HTS60 scores 77 vs 52 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

General Grabber HTS60 scores 77 vs 55 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

General Grabber HTS60 scores 76 vs 56 on dry.

Tire A · General Grabber HTS60
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro AT2

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Grabber HTS60 or Dynapro AT2?

Which is better in the wet, Grabber HTS60 or Dynapro AT2?

General Grabber HTS60, 78 vs 58 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Grabber HTS60 or Dynapro AT2?

General Grabber HTS60, 76 vs 56 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Grabber HTS60 or Dynapro AT2?

General Grabber HTS60, 72 vs 61 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Grabber HTS60 or Dynapro AT2?

General Grabber HTS60, 77 vs 52 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Grabber HTS60 or Dynapro AT2?

General Grabber HTS60, 77 vs 55 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology