Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 115 reviews
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV vs Continental SportContact 7 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 22 road tests and 115 + 1,605 owner reviews. How we score
SportContact 7 is ahead, 87–67
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 84 · 22 tests Owners 81 · 1,605 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 18 in 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)
“On my 2nd set. Got decent mileage from them. 15k miles from the first set of rears and i've 11k on the 2nd set with 4.5mm still left on them.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
67
Dry
SportContact 7 +3097Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV SportContact 7 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 21 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 100 Reviews found online 66 92 Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 66.2 = 67
SportContact 7: 60% × 99.6 + 40% × 92 = 97
No road tests of dry for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
71
Wet
SportContact 7 +2394Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV SportContact 7 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 22 tests ≈ 71 (est.) 96 Reviews found online 71 90 Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV: 60% × 70.9 (est.) + 40% × 71 = 71
SportContact 7: 60% × 96.3 + 40% × 90 = 94
No road tests of wet for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
65
Comfort
SportContact 7 +368Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV SportContact 7 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 56 Reviews found online 62 76 Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV: 40% × 67.9 (est.) + 60% × 62.4 = 65
SportContact 7: 40% × 56.4 + 60% × 75.9 = 68
No road tests of comfort for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison62Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV SportContact 7 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 19 tests – 59 Reviews found online – ≈ 67 (est.) SportContact 7: 60% × 59.1 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 62
No owner ratings of noise for SportContact 7. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
60
Treadwear
SportContact 7 +868Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV SportContact 7 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 63 (est.) 72 Reviews found online 56 61 Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV: 60% × 62.7 (est.) + 40% × 56.2 = 60
SportContact 7: 60% × 72.1 + 40% × 61.3 = 68
No road tests of treadwear for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
66
Handling (owners)
SportContact 7 +2389Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV SportContact 7 Reviews found online 66 89 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison72Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV SportContact 7 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 21 tests – 72
Scores at a glance
| Category | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV | Continental SportContact 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 87 |
| Dry | 67 | 97 |
| Wet | 71 | 94 |
| Comfort | 65 | 68 |
| Noise | – | 62 |
| Treadwear | 60 | 68 |
| Handling (owners) | 66 | 89 |
| Efficiency | – | 72 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV
SportContact 7
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV | SportContact 7 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #6/7 2016 Autobild 4x4 / SUV Tyre Test | #2/10 2026 ACE Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry traction with strong confidence during heavy rain
- Quiet and smooth ride quality with minimal road noise
- Precise steering response with no tramlining on uneven surfaces
Cons
- High initial cost mentioned by some users
- Potentially faster tread wear depending on driving habits
- Slightly noisy initially until the tires are properly worn in
Tire B SportContact 7
Pros
- Phenomenal wet and dry grip with high cornering limits
- Precise steering response and excellent road feedback
- Strong braking performance and high stability at speed
Cons
- Faster-than-average tread wear, especially with spirited driving or track use
- Stiff sidewalls can contribute to a harsher, bumpier ride
- Elevated road noise reported on certain road surfaces
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Continental SportContact 7
Community members widely praise the Continental SportContact 7 for outstanding dry and wet grip, sharp steering precision, and strong value compared to key rivals like the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S. However, users frequently highlight faster tread wear, reduced initial tread depth, and occasional issues with road noise and comfort as main drawbacks.
“Hi, i'll give my take since i've made 15K kilometers with the front tyres changed to the SC7. They last longer on normal road use and they won't give you that typical LSD noise when maneuvering. BUT you'll feel right away that they are softer on the side in the first faster than normal curve. I did not find differences while raining. On the racetrack... maybe the side is too soft, but in general i found them worse than the stock pirelli. Also, on the track you almost have to be weary of the rim from how much the side squishes and wears. I think they could be used for everyday driving, but another set of rims with other tyres should be taken into consideration when doing track days.”
“Last week I fitted brand new tyres on my '03 Z4, replaced the worn GY asymmetric 6's with Conti SC7 and I'm not pleased at all. The car also has recently installed new KW V1's, already driven on the old GY's. Now it just feels chewy in the corners. The tires have a few 100km already. Anyone else disappointed with Conti SC7? Any suggestion on tyre pressures? They filled the tyres 2,5 bar all around, later I left out some air just on the front tyres, but still unhappy. I just don't trust the car in the corners.”
“Continental SportContact 7 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 I have a 2022 Mk 8.5 with the stock 18" wheels. The original Michelin PS4 need to be replaced. Unfortunately, I am not able to source new Michelins as they are not in stock anywhere convenient. I am able to get Conti SC7s in 205/40 R18. Never used a set. Always had Michelins on all my cars. Reviews tell me that they are at least as good and probably better than the Michelins (and perhaps better even than the Michelin PS4S I run on my other car), but has anyone tried them? My other options for decent tyres in the correct size are Bridgestone Potenza Sports. I can get Pirelli P Zeros but they are the previous generation and I don't like them (having had them on another car as OEM and replaced them with Michelins after 2000kms). I am in Australia so don't need all season tyres. Thanks in advance. Read more”
Based on 114 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV | B · Continental SportContact 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 7 | 123 |
| Rim diameters | 19″ – 21″ | 18″ – 24″ |
| Tread depth | 9 - 10/32″ | 8 - 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 240 A - AA A | 240 AA A |
| Sidewall | Raised Black Lettering | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | 50 - 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 1 | 1 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV
Continental SportContact 7
Winner: Continental SportContact 7 — better dry, wet and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Continental SportContact 7 scores 97 vs 67 on dry.
Continental SportContact 7 scores 94 vs 71 on wet.
Continental SportContact 7 scores 89 vs 66 on handling.
Continental SportContact 7 scores 68 vs 60 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV or SportContact 7?
Which is better in the wet, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV or SportContact 7?
Continental SportContact 7, 94 vs 71 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV or SportContact 7?
Continental SportContact 7, 97 vs 67 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV or SportContact 7?
Continental SportContact 7, 68 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV or SportContact 7?
Continental SportContact 7, 68 vs 60 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology