tirewheelguide

Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV vs Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 559 + 12 owner reviews. How we score

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV is ahead, 75–61

Check price on Amazon · Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 76

    Dry

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV +15
    61
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUVGeolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests74≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online7858

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV: 60% × 74.3 + 40% × 78 = 76

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 61

    No road tests of dry for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 76

    Wet

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV +19
    57
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUVGeolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests74≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online7853

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV: 60% × 73.8 + 40% × 78.4 = 76

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 60.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.9 = 57

    No road tests of wet for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 71

    Comfort

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV +6
    65
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUVGeolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7462

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 73.7 = 71

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 61.8 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 72

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUVGeolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests76–
    Reviews found online67–

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV: 60% × 75.9 + 40% × 66.9 = 72

  5. 71

    Treadwear

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV +6
    65
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUVGeolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online7564

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 71

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 64 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  6. 76

    Handling (owners)

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV +18
    58
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUVGeolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Reviews found online7658
Scores at a glance
CategoryGoodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUVYokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Relative Score 75 61
Dry 76 61
Wet 76 57
Comfort 71 65
Noise 72 –
Treadwear 71 65
Handling (owners) 76 58

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV

Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and confidence-inspiring performance in both wet and dry conditions
  • Noticeably lower road noise and a smoother, more comfortable ride compared to competitors
  • Improved steering response and precise handling capabilities

Cons

  • Poor performance and lack of traction in snow and wintry conditions
  • Increased rolling resistance leading to a slight drop in fuel economy or EV efficiency for some users
  • Susceptibility to varying road surface textures, which can occasionally alter cabin noise levels
All owner themes in the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV review

Tire B Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

Pros

  • Extremely quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Improved fuel economy and low rolling resistance
  • Adequate dry road grip and handling

Cons

  • Dangerous or unreliable wet weather traction, particularly lateral grip and cornering
  • Prone to wheel spin on damp or wet surfaces
  • Accelerated or uneven tread wear reported on certain crossover and SUV models
All owner themes in the Geolandar G055 Blue Earth review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available44—
Rim diameters17″ – 22″—
Tread depth8 - 9/32″—
UTQG240 - 300 A - AA A—
Treadwear warranty50,000 mi—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised Black Lettering—
Max pressure50 - 51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV

Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV scores 76 vs 57 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV scores 76 vs 58 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV scores 76 vs 61 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV scores 71 vs 65 on comfort.

Tire A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Which is better in the wet, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV, 76 vs 57 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV, 76 vs 61 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV, 71 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV, 71 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology