Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 18 + 0 road tests and 3,596 + 121 owner reviews. How we score
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 is ahead, 84–60
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 86 · 18 tests Owners 81 · 3,596 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (wear)
“F1 Asy 5s on my S204. I can confirm they are pretty decent and have coped well with the tarmac-ripping 154hp and 184 lbs-ft torque of the M274 fitted to my wagon”
Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 121 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | Ventus V12 evo K110 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 17 / – tests | 85 | ≈ 63 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 87 | 56 |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 85.3 + 40% × 86.9 = 86
Ventus V12 evo K110: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 55.9 = 60
No road tests of dry for Ventus V12 evo K110. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | Ventus V12 evo K110 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 17 / – tests | 93 | ≈ 62 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 86 | 56 |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 92.8 + 40% × 85.8 = 90
Ventus V12 evo K110: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 55.7 = 60
No road tests of wet for Ventus V12 evo K110. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | Ventus V12 evo K110 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | ≈ 58 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | – | 36 |
Ventus V12 evo K110: 60% × 57.6 (est.) + 40% × 35.6 = 49
No road tests of snow for Ventus V12 evo K110. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | Ventus V12 evo K110 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / – tests | 94 | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 75 | 56 |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 40% × 93.6 + 60% × 75.1 = 82
Ventus V12 evo K110: 40% × 66.7 (est.) + 60% × 56.1 = 60
No road tests of comfort for Ventus V12 evo K110. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | Ventus V12 evo K110 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 13 / – tests | 73 | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 67 (est.) | 52 |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 73 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 70
Ventus V12 evo K110: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 52.1 = 61
No owner ratings of noise for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
No road tests of noise for Ventus V12 evo K110. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | Ventus V12 evo K110 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests | 83 | ≈ 61 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 72 | 51 |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 82.8 + 40% × 72.2 = 79
Ventus V12 evo K110: 60% × 60.8 (est.) + 40% × 50.8 = 57
No road tests of treadwear for Ventus V12 evo K110. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | Ventus V12 evo K110 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 85 | 63 |
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | Ventus V12 evo K110 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / – tests | 61 | – |
| Category | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 84 | 60 |
| Dry | 86 | 60 |
| Wet | 90 | 60 |
| Snow | – | 49 |
| Comfort | 82 | 60 |
| Noise | 70 | 61 |
| Treadwear | 79 | 57 |
| Handling (owners) | 85 | 63 |
| Efficiency | 61 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Ventus V12 evo K110
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | Ventus V12 evo K110 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #3/6 2021 Sportauto Summer Tire Test for Sportcars R19 | #5/9 2013 Auto Review Performance Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community members generally view the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 very positively, frequently praising its wet grip, cold weather performance, and steering feel when compared to rivals like Michelin Pilot Sport 4 and Pirelli P Zero. While some users find them exceptionally quiet, others note moderate road noise or low-speed scrubbing on full lock.
“2024 J1.1 GTS Sport Turismo on 21" Spyder RS wheels here. Went from Pirelli PZero's to NF1 Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5's recently. They don't seem any louder than the PZero's, dry grip seems about the same, as does comfort. Wet grip and performance in cold conditions (I'm in Scotland, UK) over the PZero's is noticeably better. Very little in the way of the Ackerman effect in cold temperatures, compared to the PZero's which made an awful noise and skipped badly when turning at slow speeds, pulling out of junctions. Will see how they do wear rate wise, PZero's had about 2.5 to 3mm left at 16k miles. Anything approaching that on the ASY5's would be good. Unfortunately on the J1.1 on 21"'s the choice is essentially PZero's or ASY5's. Which is disappointing as I had PS4S's and CSC7's on my previous cars (G81 M3 and M340i Touring) and they were fantastic.”
“F1 Asy 5s on my S204. I can confirm they are pretty decent and have coped well with the tarmac-ripping 154hp and 184 lbs-ft torque of the M274 fitted to my wagon”
Based on 13 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | B · Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 64 | — |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | 7 - 9/32″ | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 300 - 500 A - AA A | 280 A A |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Serrated Black Lettering | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | 50 psi |
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110
Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 — better wet, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 90 vs 60 on wet.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 86 vs 60 on dry.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 82 vs 60 on comfort.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 79 vs 57 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5, 90 vs 60 on our wet score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5, 86 vs 60 on our dry score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5, 70 vs 61 on our noise score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5, 82 vs 60 on our comfort score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5, 79 vs 57 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology
