Tests 73 · 14 tests Owners 77 · 259 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test (wet handling)
Kumho Ecsta XS KU36 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 14 + 0 road tests and 259 + 10 owner reviews. How we score
Eagle F1 SuperSport is ahead, 78–69
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 73 · 14 tests Owners 77 · 259 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test (wet handling)
Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 10 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Eagle F1 SuperSport | Ecsta XS KU36 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / – tests | 87 | ≈ 70 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 88 | 73 |
Eagle F1 SuperSport: 60% × 86.6 + 40% × 87.5 = 87
Ecsta XS KU36: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 73.4 = 72
No road tests of dry for Ecsta XS KU36. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
| Source | Eagle F1 SuperSport | Ecsta XS KU36 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / – tests | 83 | ≈ 70 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 80 | 69 |
Eagle F1 SuperSport: 60% × 82.8 + 40% × 80.1 = 82
Ecsta XS KU36: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 69.1 = 70
No road tests of wet for Ecsta XS KU36. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Eagle F1 SuperSport | Ecsta XS KU36 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / – tests | 28 | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 68 | 58 |
Eagle F1 SuperSport: 40% × 28.2 + 60% × 68 = 52
Ecsta XS KU36: 40% × 67 (est.) + 60% × 57.5 = 61
No road tests of comfort for Ecsta XS KU36. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Eagle F1 SuperSport | Ecsta XS KU36 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 10 / – tests | 33 | – |
| Reviews found online | 75 | – |
Eagle F1 SuperSport: 60% × 32.9 + 40% × 75.4 = 50
| Source | Eagle F1 SuperSport | Ecsta XS KU36 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 65 (est.) | ≈ 65 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 64 | 63 |
Eagle F1 SuperSport: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.2 = 65
Ecsta XS KU36: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 62.9 = 64
No road tests of treadwear for Eagle F1 SuperSport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta XS KU36. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
| Source | Eagle F1 SuperSport | Ecsta XS KU36 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 86 | 71 |
| Source | Eagle F1 SuperSport | Ecsta XS KU36 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / – tests | 24 | – |
| Category | Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport | Kumho Ecsta XS KU36 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 78 | 69 |
| Dry | 87 | 72 |
| Wet | 82 | 70 |
| Comfort | 52 | 61 |
| Noise | 50 | – |
| Treadwear | 65 | 64 |
| Handling (owners) | 86 | 71 |
| Efficiency | 24 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Eagle F1 SuperSport
Ecsta XS KU36
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport | B · Kumho Ecsta XS KU36 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 75 | — |
| Rim diameters | 18″ – 23″ | — |
| Tread depth | 7 - 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 080 - 300 A - AA A | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Serrated Black Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | — |
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
Kumho Ecsta XS KU36
Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport — better dry, handling and wet. Pick the Kumho Ecsta XS KU36 if comfort matters most to you. Kumho Ecsta XS KU36 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport scores 87 vs 72 on dry.
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport scores 86 vs 71 on handling.
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport scores 82 vs 70 on wet.
Kumho Ecsta XS KU36 scores 61 vs 52 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport, 82 vs 70 on our wet score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport, 87 vs 72 on our dry score.
Kumho Ecsta XS KU36, 61 vs 52 on our comfort score.
Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 64 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology