Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 186 reviews
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 vs Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 186 + 910 owner reviews. How we score
DynaPro A/TM RF10 is ahead, 71–66
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 65 · 910 reviews
“I'm having these tires put on right now. I went with the dynapro HT in a 265/65/17”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
73
Dry
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +667Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Dynapro HT RH12 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 77 67 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73
Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 67.1 = 67
No road tests of dry for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
74
Wet
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +767Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Dynapro HT RH12 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 75 66 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74
Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.9 = 67
No road tests of wet for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
65
Snow
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +560Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Dynapro HT RH12 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 62 53 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.6 = 65
Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 52.8 = 60
No road tests of snow for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
72
Comfort
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +567Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Dynapro HT RH12 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 75 66 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 72
Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 65.7 = 67
No road tests of comfort for DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
70
Noise
Level70Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Dynapro HT RH12 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 73 75 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70
Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 70
No road tests of noise for DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
71
Treadwear
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +764Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Dynapro HT RH12 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 64 Reviews found online 75 64 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 71
Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 63.9 + 40% × 64 = 64
No road tests of treadwear for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
71
Handling (owners)
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +665Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Dynapro HT RH12 Reviews found online 71 65
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 | Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 66 |
| Dry | 73 | 67 |
| Wet | 74 | 67 |
| Snow | 65 | 60 |
| Comfort | 72 | 67 |
| Noise | 70 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 71 | 64 |
| Handling (owners) | 71 | 65 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
DynaPro A/TM RF10
Dynapro HT RH12
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | DynaPro A/TM RF10 | Dynapro HT RH12 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #4/5 2019 4x4 Australia All-Terrain Tire Test R17 | #10/13 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A DynaPro A/TM RF10
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Low road noise compared to other all-terrain tires
- Strong value proposition and competitive pricing
Cons
- Inconsistent traction on wet pavement and ice
- Reports of sidewall vulnerability to punctures
- Potential for increased fuel consumption
Tire B Dynapro HT RH12
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12
Community discussions around the Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 highlight it primarily as a mid-tier, budget-conscious highway all-season option for trucks and SUVs. Drivers appreciate its quiet ride, stable tracking, and solid grip, though some note a slightly jumpy ride quality. Most mentions revolve around purchase pricing, sizing options, and comparisons to alternative all-terrain or highway tires.
“Quote: Originally Posted by Bamaman This must be one of the most popular size of tires on the retail tire market. We're talking 100's to pick from. And unfortunately it's a very expensive tire size too. Yes I've noticed they are expensive! Although I realize I am not limited to just what is in stock at my nearest DiscTire, what they have now is interesting - not many in stock right now. They range from the $169 Trailfinder All Terrain, the $206.00 Cooper Discovers ATP II, the $209.00 Hankook Dynapro HT RH12, then a big jump up to the $277.00 Michelin Defender LTX M/S, and the YUGE $293.00 BFG A/T T/A KO2. I need a tire pretty much for road driving only. I do not often go out of town but for instance I've got a 9 hour trip later this month. It snows here in my area maybe..2 weeks / year, and nothing insane. So I don't really even need A/T tires in my opinion. The Hankook Dynapro seems to fit budget and looks like a good road tire. I can't tell which ones are Chinese but, sure, I'd love to avoid that too! Thanks for all the suggestions here.”
“For Sale: 3X Used Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 Tire - 205/75R16C Description: 3 used Hankook Dynapro HT (RH12) highway all-season tire is available. This model is designed for vans, pickups, and sport utility vehicles, combining long treadwear, good ride comfort, and all-season traction. Brand: Hankook Model: Dynapro HT (RH12) Size: 205/75R16C Condition: Used/Part-worn. The tire has been previously used. Features: The tire features a high-grip silica compound for improved wet and dry traction and a reinforced under-tread to prevent internal damage from impacts. Price: $300 Location: South Denver, Metro area delivery for $50 Read more”
“I'm having these tires put on right now. I went with the dynapro HT in a 265/65/17”
Based on 8 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 | B · Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All-Season tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | — |
| Sizes available | 29 | 24 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 13/32″ | 14/32″ |
| UTQG | 560 A B | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 50,000 mi | 40,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Outlined White Lettering | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | 54 psi |
| Sizes in common | 12 | 12 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12
Winner: Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — better wet, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 74 vs 67 on wet.
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 71 vs 64 on treadwear.
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 73 vs 67 on dry.
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 71 vs 65 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Dynapro HT RH12?
Which is better in the wet, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Dynapro HT RH12?
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 74 vs 67 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Dynapro HT RH12?
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 73 vs 67 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Dynapro HT RH12?
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 65 vs 60 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Dynapro HT RH12?
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 70 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Dynapro HT RH12?
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 72 vs 67 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Dynapro HT RH12?
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 71 vs 64 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology