Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 186 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 vs Kumho Crugen HP71 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 186 + 278 owner reviews. How we score
DynaPro A/TM RF10 is ahead, 72–47
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 34 · 278 reviews
“Tesla model y tire HP71 crugen on tirerack is offering $80 rebate per tire.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
74
Dry
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +3044Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Crugen HP71 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 53 (est.) Reviews found online 77 31 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 71.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.8 = 74
Crugen HP71: 60% × 52.5 (est.) + 40% × 30.6 = 44
No road tests of dry for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
74
Wet
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +2351Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Crugen HP71 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 56 (est.) Reviews found online 76 44 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 73.4 (est.) + 40% × 75.5 = 74
Crugen HP71: 60% × 56 (est.) + 40% × 43.9 = 51
No road tests of wet for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
64
Snow
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +1153Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Crugen HP71 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 59 41 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 66.8 (est.) + 40% × 58.9 = 64
Crugen HP71: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 40.8 = 53
No road tests of snow for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
73
Comfort
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +2944Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Crugen HP71 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 74 32 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 40% × 69.9 (est.) + 60% × 74.4 = 73
Crugen HP71: 40% × 61.2 (est.) + 60% × 32.1 = 44
No road tests of comfort for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
69
Noise
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +1554Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Crugen HP71 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 73 36 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.8 = 69
Crugen HP71: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 35.5 = 54
No road tests of noise for DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Crugen HP71. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
73
Treadwear
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +3637Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Crugen HP71 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 49 (est.) Reviews found online 78 19 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 70.6 (est.) + 40% × 77.8 = 73
Crugen HP71: 60% × 49.4 (est.) + 40% × 18.5 = 37
No road tests of treadwear for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
70
Handling (owners)
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +1951Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Crugen HP71 Reviews found online 70 51
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 | Kumho Crugen HP71 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 47 |
| Dry | 74 | 44 |
| Wet | 74 | 51 |
| Snow | 64 | 53 |
| Comfort | 73 | 44 |
| Noise | 69 | 54 |
| Treadwear | 73 | 37 |
| Handling (owners) | 70 | 51 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
72
/ 100
DynaPro A/TM RF10
47
/ 100
Crugen HP71
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | DynaPro A/TM RF10 | Crugen HP71 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #4/5 2019 4x4 Australia All-Terrain Tire Test R17 | #8/9 2021 Teknikens Värld Summer Tire Test R18 | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A DynaPro A/TM RF10
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Low road noise compared to other all-terrain tires
- Strong value proposition and competitive pricing
Cons
- Inconsistent traction on wet pavement and ice
- Reports of sidewall vulnerability to punctures
- Potential for increased fuel consumption
Tire B Crugen HP71
Pros
- Strong value: frequently described as much cheaper than Michelin, Pirelli or Bridgestone alternatives while not feeling like a budget tire.
- Good wet and heavy-rain traction, with some reports of confident light-snow performance.
- Quiet, smooth ride reported by many owners, often as an improvement over the stock tires (Bridgestone Dueler, Pirelli, Hankook).
Cons
- Premature or uneven tread wear is the most common complaint, with reports of tires worn out at roughly 15,000 to 27,000 miles or within 1.5 years, far below the 65,000-mile rating.
- Road and highway noise, including howling that develops with mileage, reported by several owners.
- Vibration and difficulty keeping the tires balanced, in some cases even after repeated balancing and rotations.
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Mixed
Kumho Crugen HP71
Community opinions on the Kumho Crugen HP71 (including EV variants) are generally mixed, primarily leaning on price and initial comfort versus longevity. Many users appreciate the affordable pricing, quiet/smooth ride, and good handling, but a significant number report faster-than-expected tread wear and occasional issues with foam lining separation or durability on heavier vehicles.
r/tires
·2026-10-14
“Kumho warranty I had these for a little under 18 months. The thread is still good, but the tires have these cracks. Do you guys think I can claim warranty from Kumho? These are Kumho Crugen HP71. Manufacturing date 01/24.”
r/TeslaModelY
·4 upvotes ·2026-06-17
“Tesla model y tire HP71 crugen on tirerack is offering $80 rebate per tire.”
bobistheoilguy.com
·2023-03-02
“Bought a set of Kumho tires to replace the OE Michelins on the wife's Ford Edge. The Michelins have barely 35K and aren't going to pass the NC safety check. For being a top tier tire they were wildly mediocre. I've has several sets of Kumho and they are better than average and not too expensive. I bought four of these. Anybody have experience with Kumhos? Kumho Crugen HP71 245 /60 R18 105V SL BSW”
Top themes
#Affordability and Value#Ride Comfort and Noise#Tread Wear and Longevity#EV Performance and Efficiency#Durability and Quality Issues
Based on 52 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 | B · Kumho Crugen HP71 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 29 | 63 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 16″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 13/32″ | 9.9/32″ |
| UTQG | 560 A B | 640 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 50,000 mi | 65,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Outlined White Lettering | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 11 | 11 |
Which one should you actually buy?
72
/ 100
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
47
/ 100
Kumho Crugen HP71
Winner: Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — better treadwear, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 73 vs 37 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 74 vs 44 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 73 vs 44 on comfort.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 74 vs 51 on wet.
Tire A · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Tire B · Kumho Crugen HP71
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Crugen HP71?
Which is better in the wet, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Crugen HP71?
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 74 vs 51 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Crugen HP71?
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 74 vs 44 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Crugen HP71?
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 64 vs 53 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Crugen HP71?
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 69 vs 54 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Crugen HP71?
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 73 vs 44 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Crugen HP71?
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 73 vs 37 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology