tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 vs Kumho Crugen HP71 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 186 + 275 owner reviews. How we score

DynaPro A/TM RF10 is ahead, 71–52

Check price on Amazon · DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Crugen HP71 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Crugen HP71
Tire BKumho

Crugen HP71

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Tests – · none yet Owners 41 · 275 reviews

“Tesla model y tire HP71 crugen on tirerack is offering $80 rebate per tire.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +25
    48
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Crugen HP71
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 55 (est.)
    Reviews found online7737

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 55.2 (est.) + 40% × 36.6 = 48

    No road tests of dry for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 74

    Wet

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +19
    55
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Crugen HP71
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online7549

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 58.2 (est.) + 40% × 49.1 = 55

    No road tests of wet for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 65

    Snow

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +8
    57
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Crugen HP71
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online6248

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.6 = 65

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 47.6 = 57

    No road tests of snow for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 72

    Comfort

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +18
    54
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Crugen HP71
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online7540

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 72

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 64 (est.) + 40% × 39.6 = 54

    No road tests of comfort for DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Crugen HP71. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 70

    Noise

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +12
    58
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Crugen HP71
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7344

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 43.7 = 58

    No road tests of noise for DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Crugen HP71. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 71

    Treadwear

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +27
    44
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Crugen HP71
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 54 (est.)
    Reviews found online7529

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 71

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 54.4 (est.) + 40% × 29.1 = 44

    No road tests of treadwear for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 71

    Handling (owners)

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +16
    55
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Crugen HP71
    Reviews found online7155
Scores at a glance
CategoryHankook DynaPro A/TM RF10Kumho Crugen HP71
Relative Score 71 52
Dry 73 48
Wet 74 55
Snow 65 57
Comfort 72 54
Noise 70 58
Treadwear 71 44
Handling (owners) 71 55

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

DynaPro A/TM RF10

Crugen HP71

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryDynaPro A/TM RF10Crugen HP71ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #4/5 2019 4x4 Australia All-Terrain Tire Test R17 #8/9 2021 Teknikens Värld Summer Tire Test R18 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A DynaPro A/TM RF10

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Low road noise compared to other all-terrain tires
  • Strong value proposition and competitive pricing

Cons

  • Inconsistent traction on wet pavement and ice
  • Reports of sidewall vulnerability to punctures
  • Potential for increased fuel consumption
All owner themes in the DynaPro A/TM RF10 review

Tire B Crugen HP71

Pros

  • Affordable pricing compared to premium tier brands
  • Quiet and smooth ride quality when new
  • Confident wet-weather traction and performance in heavy rain

Cons

  • Significantly premature tread wear and short lifespan for many users
  • Developing loud road noise or howling as mileage increases
  • Balancing issues and vehicle vibrations
All owner themes in the Crugen HP71 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Kumho Crugen HP71

Mixed

Community sentiment for the Kumho Crugen HP71 (and its EV variant) is mixed, with owners praising its affordability, comfortable ride, and quiet performance on many vehicles. However, a significant number of drivers report disappointingly rapid tread wear—particularly on heavy electric vehicles—as well as occasional noise on coarse surfaces and internal acoustic foam detachment issues.

bobistheoilguy.com ·2023-03-02

“Bought a set of Kumho tires to replace the OE Michelins on the wife's Ford Edge. The Michelins have barely 35K and aren't going to pass the NC safety check. For being a top tier tire they were wildly mediocre. I've has several sets of Kumho and they are better than average and not too expensive. I bought four of these. Anybody have experience with Kumhos? Kumho​ Crugen HP71​ 245 /60 R18 105V SL BSW​”
r/VWiD4Owners ·3 upvotes ·2026-02-14

“2023 ID4 AWD Pro S Kumho Crugen EV HP71 I replaced the original worn down (and one with a sidewall bump) Pirellis at 33k with the EV version (badges on the sidewall) of the HP71 (direct from dealer). They're more expensive than the non-EV versions and have a lower warranty. So far they're impressive: ride is softer/smoother, quieter, deep treads. Hard to tell if efficiency changed with the winter weather, but we were getting 3mi/kWh on a 34 degree day.”
teslamotorsclub.com ·2 upvotes ·2026-02-12

“That is a crazy good price - The TA91 is low $200s wholesale! (Tire shop pricing). And $279.30 retail. (Tire Rack) Grab them while you can. Sometimes Wal Mart beats any price I can get when they're blowing out a specific tire. FWIW we run the Kumho HP71 EV (OE tire) on our EV9 and it's a super quiet tire. I bought it again for the Spring now that the car is actually aligned and won't burn through them.”
Top themes
#Rapid tread wear#Affordable price value#Cabin noise levels#Ride comfort#EV tire performance#Acoustic foam issues#OEM tire replacement

Based on 51 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 B · Kumho Crugen HP71
CategoryAll-Terrain tireSummer Ultra High Performance tires
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available2963
Rim diameters15″ – 20″16″ – 22″
Tread depth13/32″9.9/32″
UTQG560 A B640 A A
Treadwear warranty50,000 mi65,000 mi
SidewallOutlined White LetteringBlackwall
Max pressure44 psi51 psi
Sizes in common1111

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10

Kumho Crugen HP71

Winner: Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — better treadwear, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 71 vs 44 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 73 vs 48 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 74 vs 55 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 72 vs 54 on comfort.

Tire A · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Kumho Crugen HP71
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Crugen HP71?

Which is better in the wet, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Crugen HP71?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 74 vs 55 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Crugen HP71?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 73 vs 48 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Crugen HP71?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 65 vs 57 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Crugen HP71?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 70 vs 58 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Crugen HP71?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 72 vs 54 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Crugen HP71?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 71 vs 44 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology