tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 vs Yokohama Geolandar G900 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 186 + 14 owner reviews. How we score

DynaPro A/TM RF10 is ahead, 72–66

Check price on Amazon · DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Geolandar G900 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +5
    68
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Geolandar G900
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7768

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73

    Geolandar G900: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 68.1 = 68

    No road tests of dry for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Geolandar G900. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 74

    Wet

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +4
    70
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Geolandar G900
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7571

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74

    Geolandar G900: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.7 = 70

    No road tests of wet for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Geolandar G900. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 65

    Snow

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +1
    64
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Geolandar G900
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6261

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.6 = 65

    Geolandar G900: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 60.8 = 64

    No road tests of snow for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Geolandar G900. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 72

    Comfort

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +7
    65
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Geolandar G900
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7560

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 72

    Geolandar G900: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 60.3 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Geolandar G900. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 70

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Geolandar G900
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online73–

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70

    No road tests of noise for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 71

    Treadwear

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +8
    63
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Geolandar G900
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online7561

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 71

    Geolandar G900: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 60.9 = 63

    No road tests of treadwear for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar G900. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 71

    Handling (owners)

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +9
    62
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Geolandar G900
    Reviews found online7162
Scores at a glance
CategoryHankook DynaPro A/TM RF10Yokohama Geolandar G900
Relative Score 72 66
Dry 73 68
Wet 74 70
Snow 65 64
Comfort 72 65
Noise 70 –
Treadwear 71 63
Handling (owners) 71 62

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

DynaPro A/TM RF10

Geolandar G900

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A DynaPro A/TM RF10

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Low road noise compared to other all-terrain tires
  • Strong value proposition and competitive pricing

Cons

  • Inconsistent traction on wet pavement and ice
  • Reports of sidewall vulnerability to punctures
  • Potential for increased fuel consumption
All owner themes in the DynaPro A/TM RF10 review

Tire B Geolandar G900

Pros

  • Excellent all-terrain versatility including snow, gravel, and mud
  • Predictable and secure handling characteristics
  • High level of ride comfort compared to stiffer premium alternatives

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread life with many reports of premature wear
  • High road noise levels, particularly on motorways
  • High price point relative to current market competitors
All owner themes in the Geolandar G900 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 B · Yokohama Geolandar G900
CategoryAll-Terrain tireWinter
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available292
Rim diameters15″ – 20″16″ – 17″
Tread depth13/32″—
UTQG560 A B—
Treadwear warranty50,000 mi—
SidewallOutlined White Lettering—
Max pressure44 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10

Yokohama Geolandar G900

Winner: Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — better handling, treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Yokohama Geolandar G900 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 71 vs 62 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 71 vs 63 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 72 vs 65 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 73 vs 68 on dry.

Tire A · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar G900
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Geolandar G900?

Which is better in the wet, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Geolandar G900?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 74 vs 70 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Geolandar G900?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 73 vs 68 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Geolandar G900?

Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 64 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Geolandar G900?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 72 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Geolandar G900?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 71 vs 63 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology