Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 vs Michelin Latitude Cross — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 67 + 63 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Dynapro HP2 RA33 and Latitude Cross are level at 74.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +1
    73
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2 RA33Latitude Cross
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7775

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 71.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.8 = 74

    Latitude Cross: 60% × 70.9 (est.) + 40% × 75.1 = 73

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Latitude Cross. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 77

    Wet

    Level
    77
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2 RA33Latitude Cross
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 76 (est.)≈ 75 (est.)
    Reviews found online8079

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 75.7 (est.) + 40% × 79.8 = 77

    Latitude Cross: 60% × 75.5 (est.) + 40% × 79.4 = 77

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Latitude Cross. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 68

    Snow

    Latitude Cross +2
    70
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2 RA33Latitude Cross
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6770

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 66.7 = 68

    Latitude Cross: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 69.5 = 70

    No road tests of snow for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Latitude Cross. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 75

    Comfort

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +3
    72
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2 RA33Latitude Cross
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7773

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 40% × 70.4 (est.) + 60% × 77.3 = 75

    Latitude Cross: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 73.1 = 72

    No road tests of comfort for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Latitude Cross. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 70

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2 RA33Latitude Cross
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online74–

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 74.4 = 70

    No road tests of noise for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 73

    Treadwear

    Latitude Cross +2
    75
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2 RA33Latitude Cross
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online7781

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 76.7 = 73

    Latitude Cross: 60% × 71.6 (est.) + 40% × 80.7 = 75

    No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Latitude Cross. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 74

    Handling (owners)

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +2
    72
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2 RA33Latitude Cross
    Reviews found online7472
Scores at a glance
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 vs Michelin Latitude Cross: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Dynapro HP2 RA33Michelin Latitude Cross
Relative Score 74 74
Dry 74 73
Wet 77 77
Snow 68 70
Comfort 75 72
Noise 70 –
Treadwear 73 75
Handling (owners) 74 72

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Dynapro HP2 RA33

± 7

Latitude Cross

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Dynapro HP2 RA33

Pros

  • Exceptional value and cost-effectiveness compared to premium brands like Michelin
  • Quiet, smooth, and comfortable ride quality
  • Strong dry and wet traction under normal driving conditions

Cons

  • Occasional road noise or humming sound at higher speeds or on concrete surfaces
  • Potential for faster or average tread wear depending on driving habits and vehicle type
  • Some users reported sketchy wet cornering grip or sliding on roundabouts
All owner themes in the Dynapro HP2 RA33 review

Tire B Latitude Cross

Pros

  • Exceptional wet-weather traction and resistance to aquaplaning
  • Impressive tread life and durability over high mileage
  • Strong off-road performance on mud, gravel, and grass

Cons

  • Reports of sidewall vulnerability to sharp rocks and punctures
  • Increased fuel consumption compared to road-biased tires
  • Performance degradation and hardening of the rubber compound over long-term aging (5+ years)
All owner themes in the Latitude Cross review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 B · Michelin Latitude Cross
CategorySummerAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available4934
Rim diameters15″ – 22″15″ – 18″
UTQG—320 A A
Treadwear warranty65,000 mi—
Sizes in common2424

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33

Michelin Latitude Cross

Too close to call: Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 and Michelin Latitude Cross are within 2 points overall. Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 is stronger on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 75 vs 72 on comfort.

Tire A · Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
Tire B · Michelin Latitude Cross

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Latitude Cross?

Which is better in the wet, Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Latitude Cross?

Neither, by our numbers: 77 vs 77 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Latitude Cross?

Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 73 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Latitude Cross?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 70 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Latitude Cross?

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 75 vs 72 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Latitude Cross?

Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 75 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology