Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 1 + 4 road tests and 910 + 2,560 owner reviews. How we score

CrossClimate 2 SUV is ahead, 81–66

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Dynapro HT RH12
Tire AHankook

Dynapro HT RH12

All-Season tire

Tests – · 1 test Owners 65 · 910 reviews

“I'm having these tires put on right now. I went with the dynapro HT in a 265/65/17”

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
Tire BMichelin

CrossClimate 2 SUV

All Season

Tests 86 · 4 tests Owners 78 · 2,560 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2023 SUV All Season Tyre Test (dry braking)

“my concern about the CC2s is that they don't protect the rim of the tire?”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 67

    Dry

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +17
    84
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HT RH12CrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests≈ 67 (est.)85
    Reviews found online6783

    Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 67.1 = 67

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 85.3 + 40% × 82.5 = 84

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 67

    Wet

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +15
    82
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HT RH12CrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests≈ 68 (est.)83
    Reviews found online6681

    Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.9 = 67

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 83 + 40% × 80.9 = 82

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 60

    Snow

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +28
    88
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HT RH12CrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests≈ 64 (est.)96
    Reviews found online5377

    Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 52.8 = 60

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 96.3 + 40% × 76.5 = 88

    No road tests of snow for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 67

    Comfort

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +16
    83
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HT RH12CrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 69 (est.)82
    Reviews found online6683

    Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 65.7 = 67

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 82.1 + 40% × 83.4 = 83

    No road tests of comfort for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 70

    Noise

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +7
    77
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HT RH12CrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests≈ 67 (est.)83
    Reviews found online75≈ 67 (est.)

    Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 70

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 82.8 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 77

    No road tests of noise for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

    No owner ratings of noise for CrossClimate 2 SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 64

    Treadwear

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +3
    67
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HT RH12CrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests64≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6469

    Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 63.9 + 40% × 64 = 64

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 67

    No road tests of treadwear for CrossClimate 2 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 65

    Handling (owners)

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +17
    82
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HT RH12CrossClimate 2 SUV
    Reviews found online6582
Scores at a glance
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Dynapro HT RH12Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
Relative Score 66 81
Dry 67 84
Wet 67 82
Snow 60 88
Comfort 67 83
Noise 70 77
Treadwear 64 67
Handling (owners) 65 82

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Dynapro HT RH12

CrossClimate 2 SUV

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryDynapro HT RH12CrossClimate 2 SUVΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #10/13 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires #1/7 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Dynapro HT RH12

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B CrossClimate 2 SUV

Pros

  • Exceptional wet, ice, and snow traction that inspires winter-weather driving confidence
  • Significantly improved ride comfort and impact absorption over road imperfections
  • Impressive tread life and durability yielding long-term value

Cons

  • Higher initial purchase price compared to competitors
  • Minor fuel economy or range drop reported by some users, especially on hybrids and EVs
  • Occasional low-pitched or increased road noise at highway speeds (between 50-70 MPH)
All owner themes in the CrossClimate 2 SUV review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Hankook Dynapro HT RH12

Positive

Community discussions around the Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 highlight it primarily as a mid-tier, budget-conscious highway all-season option for trucks and SUVs. Drivers appreciate its quiet ride, stable tracking, and solid grip, though some note a slightly jumpy ride quality. Most mentions revolve around purchase pricing, sizing options, and comparisons to alternative all-terrain or highway tires.

f150forum.com

“Quote: Originally Posted by Bamaman This must be one of the most popular size of tires on the retail tire market. We're talking 100's to pick from. And unfortunately it's a very expensive tire size too. Yes I've noticed they are expensive! Although I realize I am not limited to just what is in stock at my nearest DiscTire, what they have now is interesting - not many in stock right now. They range from the $169 Trailfinder All Terrain, the $206.00 Cooper Discovers ATP II, the $209.00 Hankook Dynapro HT RH12, then a big jump up to the $277.00 Michelin Defender LTX M/S, and the YUGE $293.00 BFG A/T T/A KO2. I need a tire pretty much for road driving only. I do not often go out of town but for instance I've got a 9 hour trip later this month. It snows here in my area maybe..2 weeks / year, and nothing insane. So I don't really even need A/T tires in my opinion. The Hankook Dynapro seems to fit budget and looks like a good road tire. I can't tell which ones are Chinese but, sure, I'd love to avoid that too! Thanks for all the suggestions here.”

r/denverlist ·2025-12-09

“For Sale: 3X Used Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 Tire - 205/75R16C Description: 3 used Hankook Dynapro HT (RH12) highway all-season tire is available. This model is designed for vans, pickups, and sport utility vehicles, combining long treadwear, good ride comfort, and all-season traction. Brand: Hankook Model: Dynapro HT (RH12) Size: 205/75R16C Condition: Used/Part-worn. The tire has been previously used. Features: The tire features a high-grip silica compound for improved wet and dry traction and a reinforced under-tread to prevent internal damage from impacts. Price: $300 Location: South Denver, Metro area delivery for $50 Read more”

ridgelineownersclub.com ·2012-10-28

“I'm having these tires put on right now. I went with the dynapro HT in a 265/65/17”

Top themes
#pricing and affordability#quiet highway ride#wet and dry traction#tire comparisons#ride comfort and stability

Based on 8 community posts

Tire B

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

Positive

Community sentiment for the Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV is largely positive, with drivers consistently praising its exceptional grip and safety in snow, slush, and heavy rain. The primary trade-offs frequently cited are reduced fuel/range efficiency—particularly noted by EV owners—along with a premium price tag, directional rotation limitations, and mixed opinions on road noise.

mbworld.org

“Quote: Originally Posted by Gitzer I think the advice on this thread is exactly right. In fact, don’t drive your new car if there is any snow or ice on the road. Get the CC2s or equivalent immediately. You are going to need them next winter anyway. Lots of people are recommending, the CCs but aren’t they all-seasons? It seems like if I’m already stuck owning Summer tires, I’m better off buying an winter set and alternating, vs owning a Summer a All Season, no? What’s killing me is no one has or can order winter tires this late in the season. it’s really frustrating that the brand new luxury car doesn’t come with all seasons, or some tires that are even safe to opperate where the vehicle was sold. Im literally going to have to rent a a car on cold days to keep my family safe ☹️”

bobistheoilguy.com ·1 upvote ·2025-07-21

“You got that right! Between my local tire shop and many on here claiming the CC2s was the greatest thing since the forward pass I took the plunge. Last week I took the manager for a ride at the tire shop and he said that’s the complaints he hears about them. He still thinks the noise is worth the trade off in the snow, even though we get next to none here anymore. They’ve been balanced on a hunter and road forced yet still vibrate at 80. When I swap out the CC2s for my lx 25s there’s no vibration whatsoever and next to no sound. The lx25s are one of the ugliest tires I’ve ever seen or I’d just run with them. My goal is to use the lx25s as a winter tire and get pro contacts to replace the Michelins, but, I can’t get the Michelins to wear out. Which is obviously a good thing considering they cost a grand. They went to 7-8/32nds and stalled like a brisket. Meanwhile at almost 2 yrs old they’re getting harder as everyday passes. Worst “premium” tire I’ve ever purchased!”

r/tires ·3 upvotes ·2026-02-12

“Look at all weather tires (3PMSF rated) instead of a basic all season. Michelin CrossClimate2 is hard to beat for safety and snow grip and they’re not that loud in my experience. I put them on my wife’s Highlander and they’ve been smooth and confident in slush and highway rain. If you want something a little quieter and softer riding, Bridgestone WeatherPeak or Pirelli Scorpion WeatherActive are also solid. When I priced 245/50R20 CC2s recently, Costco was around $314 per tire installed $1,256 set before tax during a promo, Tire Rack was about $302 per tire $1,208 before install and Discounted Wheel Warehouse had them closer to $279 per tire $1,116 before install so roughly $140 difference on a set before mounting”

Top themes
#Snow and winter traction#Wet grip and hydroplaning resistance#EV range and fuel efficiency impact#Road noise and ride comfort#High price and premium value#Directional tread rotation limits#Treadwear and longevity

Based on 97 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 B · Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
CategoryAll-Season tireAll Season
Vehicle type—SUV and 4x4
Sizes available2435
Rim diameters15″ – 22″17″ – 22″
Tread depth14/32″—
Treadwear warranty40,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure54 psi—
Sizes in common33

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Dynapro HT RH12

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

Winner: Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV — better snow, dry and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 88 vs 60 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 84 vs 67 on dry.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 82 vs 65 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 83 vs 67 on comfort.

Tire A · Hankook Dynapro HT RH12
Tire B · Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Dynapro HT RH12 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Which is better in the wet, Dynapro HT RH12 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 82 vs 67 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro HT RH12 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 84 vs 67 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Dynapro HT RH12 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 88 vs 60 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Dynapro HT RH12 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 77 vs 70 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Dynapro HT RH12 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 83 vs 67 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Dynapro HT RH12 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 67 vs 64 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology