tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 vs Nexen CP672 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 910 + 83 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Dynapro HT RH12 66, CP672 67.

Check price on Amazon · Dynapro HT RH12 Check price on Amazon · CP672
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Dynapro HT RH12
Tire AHankook

Dynapro HT RH12

All-Season tire

Tests – · 1 test Owners 65 · 910 reviews

“I'm having these tires put on right now. I went with the dynapro HT in a 265/65/17”

Nexen CP672
Tire BNexen

CP672

All Season

Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 83 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 67

    Dry

    Level
    67
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HT RH12CP672
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6766

    Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 67.1 = 67

    CP672: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 66.1 = 67

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for CP672. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 67

    Wet

    CP672 +1
    68
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HT RH12CP672
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6667

    Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.9 = 67

    CP672: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 66.8 = 68

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for CP672. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 60

    Snow

    CP672 +8
    68
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HT RH12CP672
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online5367

    Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 52.8 = 60

    CP672: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 68

    No road tests of snow for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for CP672. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 67

    Comfort

    Level
    67
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HT RH12CP672
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6665

    Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 65.7 = 67

    CP672: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 65.3 = 67

    No road tests of comfort for Dynapro HT RH12 or CP672. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 70

    Noise

    Dynapro HT RH12 +1
    69
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HT RH12CP672
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7571

    Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 70

    CP672: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.1 = 69

    No road tests of noise for Dynapro HT RH12 or CP672. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 64

    Treadwear

    CP672 +2
    66
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HT RH12CP672
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests64≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6467

    Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 63.9 + 40% × 64 = 64

    CP672: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 66.9 = 66

    No road tests of treadwear for CP672. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 65

    Handling (owners)

    Level
    65
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HT RH12CP672
    Reviews found online6565
Scores at a glance
CategoryHankook Dynapro HT RH12Nexen CP672
Relative Score 66 67
Dry 67 67
Wet 67 68
Snow 60 68
Comfort 67 67
Noise 70 69
Treadwear 64 66
Handling (owners) 65 65

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Dynapro HT RH12

CP672

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Dynapro HT RH12

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B CP672

Pros

  • Exceptional price-to-performance ratio and overall affordability
  • Low road noise providing a smooth, quiet, and comfortable ride
  • Impressive tread life and long-term durability

Cons

  • Subpar wet traction and occasional wheel spin reported by some drivers
  • Minor initial squishiness or lack of sharp initial steering bite on tight turns
  • Potential for accelerated shoulder wear if wheel alignment is not meticulously maintained
All owner themes in the CP672 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Hankook Dynapro HT RH12

Positive

Community discussions around the Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 highlight it primarily as a mid-tier, budget-conscious highway all-season option for trucks and SUVs. Drivers appreciate its quiet ride, stable tracking, and solid grip, though some note a slightly jumpy ride quality. Most mentions revolve around purchase pricing, sizing options, and comparisons to alternative all-terrain or highway tires.

f150forum.com

“Quote: Originally Posted by Bamaman This must be one of the most popular size of tires on the retail tire market. We're talking 100's to pick from. And unfortunately it's a very expensive tire size too. Yes I've noticed they are expensive! Although I realize I am not limited to just what is in stock at my nearest DiscTire, what they have now is interesting - not many in stock right now. They range from the $169 Trailfinder All Terrain, the $206.00 Cooper Discovers ATP II, the $209.00 Hankook Dynapro HT RH12, then a big jump up to the $277.00 Michelin Defender LTX M/S, and the YUGE $293.00 BFG A/T T/A KO2. I need a tire pretty much for road driving only. I do not often go out of town but for instance I've got a 9 hour trip later this month. It snows here in my area maybe..2 weeks / year, and nothing insane. So I don't really even need A/T tires in my opinion. The Hankook Dynapro seems to fit budget and looks like a good road tire. I can't tell which ones are Chinese but, sure, I'd love to avoid that too! Thanks for all the suggestions here.”
r/denverlist ·2025-12-09

“For Sale: 3X Used Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 Tire - 205/75R16C Description: 3 used Hankook Dynapro HT (RH12) highway all-season tire is available. This model is designed for vans, pickups, and sport utility vehicles, combining long treadwear, good ride comfort, and all-season traction. Brand: Hankook Model: Dynapro HT (RH12) Size: 205/75R16C Condition: Used/Part-worn. The tire has been previously used. Features: The tire features a high-grip silica compound for improved wet and dry traction and a reinforced under-tread to prevent internal damage from impacts. Price: $300 Location: South Denver, Metro area delivery for $50 Read more”
ridgelineownersclub.com ·2012-10-28

“I'm having these tires put on right now. I went with the dynapro HT in a 265/65/17”
Top themes
#pricing and affordability#quiet highway ride#wet and dry traction#tire comparisons#ride comfort and stability

Based on 8 community posts

Tire B

Nexen CP672

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 B · Nexen CP672
CategoryAll-Season tireAll Season
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available2441
Rim diameters15″ – 22″14″ – 18″
Tread depth14/32″9/32″
UTQG—460 A A
Treadwear warranty40,000 mi70,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure54 psi44 psi
Sizes in common22

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Dynapro HT RH12

Nexen CP672

Too close to call: Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 and Nexen CP672 are within 2 points overall. Nexen CP672 is stronger on snow.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Nexen CP672 scores 68 vs 60 on snow.

Tire A · Hankook Dynapro HT RH12
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Nexen CP672
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Dynapro HT RH12 or CP672?

Which is better in the wet, Dynapro HT RH12 or CP672?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 68 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro HT RH12 or CP672?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 67 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, Dynapro HT RH12 or CP672?

Nexen CP672, 68 vs 60 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Dynapro HT RH12 or CP672?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 69 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Dynapro HT RH12 or CP672?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 67 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Dynapro HT RH12 or CP672?

Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 66 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology