Head-to-head Updated

Hankook iON evo SUV vs Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 4 road tests and 3 + 2,588 owner reviews. How we score

CrossClimate 2 SUV is ahead, 82–76

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook iON evo SUV
Tire AHankook

iON evo SUV

Summer

± 6Provisional

Tests 79 · 1 test Owners 74 · 3 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2024 EV Tyre Test (dry braking)

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
Tire BMichelin

CrossClimate 2 SUV

All Season

± 5

Tests 87 · 4 tests Owners 83 · 2,588 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2023 SUV All Season Tyre Test (dry braking)

“Opinions please ... Michelin Primacy 4+ vs Michelin Cross Climate 2 SUV? Hi all ... I'm coming up to tyre replacement time so I've looking at what's around. Currently on Bridgestone Turanzas cos that's what came with the car, but I'm not hugely impressed with their lifespan, they seem to pick up sidewall damage easily and the tread seems to age quickly. Which is not much cop when all i do is commute round Southern England. I've pretty much settled on Michelin Primacy 4+ or Cross Climate 2 SUV but I'm having difficulty making a final decision. So I thought the hivemind might settle this: in your experience which one is best for lifespan and fuel consumption? Car is a 2018 SEAT Ateca with 18" alloys. Edit: well guys, I went with the Cross Climates, thanks for the advice!”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 79

    Dry

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +8
    87
    Why this score
    SourceiON evo SUVCrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 4 tests8286
    Reviews found online7688

    iON evo SUV: 60% × 81.9 + 40% × 75.8 = 79

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 85.9 + 40% × 88.2 = 87

  2. 77

    Wet

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +7
    84
    Why this score
    SourceiON evo SUVCrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 4 tests7884
    Reviews found online7785

    iON evo SUV: 60% × 77.5 + 40% × 77.1 = 77

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 84 + 40% × 84.7 = 84

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    90
    Why this score
    SourceiON evo SUVCrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests–97
    Reviews found online–80

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 97.3 + 40% × 80.1 = 90

  4. 71

    Comfort

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +14
    85
    Why this score
    SourceiON evo SUVCrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 69 (est.)81
    Reviews found online7288

    iON evo SUV: 40% × 69.4 (est.) + 60% × 71.8 = 71

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 40% × 81 + 60% × 87.6 = 85

    No road tests of comfort for iON evo SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 76

    Noise

    Level
    76
    Why this score
    SourceiON evo SUVCrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 4 tests8282
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)

    iON evo SUV: 60% × 82.1 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 76

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 81.7 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 76

    No owner ratings of noise for iON evo SUV or CrossClimate 2 SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 74

    Treadwear

    iON evo SUV +4
    70
    Why this score
    SourceiON evo SUVCrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests78≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6973

    iON evo SUV: 60% × 77.5 + 40% × 69.3 = 74

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.8 = 70

    No road tests of treadwear for CrossClimate 2 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 75

    Handling (owners)

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +14
    89
    Why this score
    SourceiON evo SUVCrossClimate 2 SUV
    Reviews found online7589
  8. 74

    Efficiency

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +13
    87
    Why this score
    SourceiON evo SUVCrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 3 tests7487
Scores at a glance
Hankook iON evo SUV vs Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook iON evo SUVMichelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
Relative Score 76 82
Dry 79 87
Wet 77 84
Snow – 90
Comfort 71 85
Noise 76 76
Treadwear 74 70
Handling (owners) 75 89
Efficiency 74 87

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

iON evo SUV

± 5

CrossClimate 2 SUV

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryiON evo SUVCrossClimate 2 SUVΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 100% #1/9 · 2024 EV Tyre Test 100% #1/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 98% #5/9 · 2024 EV Tyre Test 83% #6/9 · 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 – Different tests
Curved Aquaplaning Wet 91% #5/9 · 2024 EV Tyre Test 87% #3/9 · 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 99% #5/9 · 2024 EV Tyre Test 100% #1/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 96% #5/9 · 2024 EV Tyre Test 99% #3/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 96% #5/9 · 2024 EV Tyre Test 83% #6/9 · 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 – Different tests
Noise Noise 100% #1/9 · 2024 EV Tyre Test 100% #3/9 · 2024 Motor SUV All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #3/9 2024 EV Tyre Test #1/7 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A iON evo SUV

Pros

  • Significantly quieter and smoother ride compared to OEM or competitor tires
  • Improved energy efficiency and fuel economy (mpg)
  • Excellent value for money, offering high performance at a lower price point than competitors like Michelin

Cons

  • Tread wear is rated as only average, with users estimating a moderate total lifespan on heavier vehicles
All owner themes in the iON evo SUV review

Tire B CrossClimate 2 SUV

Pros

  • Exceptional wet, ice, and snow traction that inspires winter-weather driving confidence
  • Significantly improved ride comfort and impact absorption over road imperfections
  • Impressive tread life and durability yielding long-term value

Cons

  • Higher initial purchase price compared to competitors
  • Minor fuel economy or range drop reported by some users, especially on hybrids and EVs
  • Occasional low-pitched or increased road noise at highway speeds (between 50-70 MPH)
All owner themes in the CrossClimate 2 SUV review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Hankook iON evo SUV

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

Positive

Community members generally view the Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV as a premium, dependable tire known for strong snow and dry performance, comfortable driving feel, and valuable 3PMS certification. Discussions frequently center around sizing availability, comparison to other models like the Primacy or standard CrossClimate 2, and choosing between specific speed or OEM ratings.

chrforums.uk ·2 upvotes ·2024-06-04

“I have the Michelin Cross Climate 2 SUV tyres . The many reviews I read approved of their performance in snowy conditions (if that is an issue where you live) and also their dry condition performance. They supposedly have a decent life span. They felt nicer to drive on than the Primacy tyres . They weren't cheap at about £170 each fitted but will give me some insurance about snowy conditions and will hopefully last until I swap the car in about 3 years.”

r/tires ·2 upvotes ·2025-07-10

“CrossClimate 2 SUV not offered in 245/60R18, what would be the closest alternative? I'm trying to buy the best tires for a family SUV (Ford Edge) driving in south-east USA. Being able to drive in very wet conditions (hydroplaning resistance) safely and comfort/quiet are high priorities. Ice/general handling are also important to me but less high-prio since we don't get a lot of snow and it's a family SUV that is mostly not driven spirited. Treadwear/Cost is lowest priority, I just want the safest option, but ideally it wouldn't wear out too fast, at least 40-50k miles if that's reasonable. I can't find any CrossClimate 2 SUV sets in this size and those would be my first choice. Is it better to just get regular CrossClimate 2's in that size or should I get the SUV oriented Pirelli Scorpion WeatherActive (this is what Tirerack is recommending me to get)? I've come to realize the CrossClimate 3's wont be here in time before the tires become too unsafe to drive on, which is extremely unfortunate timing.”

mbworld.org

“So here's the latest on Tires recommendations: (still dithering). Looking for smooth, soft ride, good mileage. I do have a mountain home; use ~30ish days during winter ski season, but mostly highway driving in Southern California ( don't disparage me for being a Californian. I cant stand the people or the government too lol. But it's a beautiful state). 2020 300GLC 4MATIC California car, 235/60 18H rating What will it be...?????? MICHELIN DEFENDER LTX M/S - seems like you guys are in favor. But hard to get. And the size is a 235/60 106T designation. Is the T speed max of 116mph not safe enough when OEM was an H rating 130mph? MICHELIN DEFENDER2. $238. Tire rack MICHELIN CrossClimate2 SUV tire rack $248. - hearing both good and bad. I heard they're soft and mileage tanks. Check out reviews on the Michelin USA official site. Pretty interesting. CONTINENTAL CROSSCONTACT LX25 $222. tire rack high rating? Also just got this from TireRack customer service CONTINENTAL EXTREMECONTACT DWS 06 PLUS. $238. Not sure, seems like TR is trying to promote them for Cont.”

Top themes
#snow and dry performance#speed and OEM ratings#tire size availability#comfort and driving feel#comparison with Primacy#SUV versus standard version

Based on 8 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook iON evo SUV B · Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
CategorySummerAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available5635
Rim diameters17″ – 23″17″ – 22″
UTQG200 - 340 A - AA A—
Sizes in common1818

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook iON evo SUV

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

Winner: Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV — better comfort, handling and efficiency. Pick the Hankook iON evo SUV if treadwear matters most to you. Hankook iON evo SUV rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 3 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 85 vs 71 on comfort.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 89 vs 75 on handling.

Pick tire B You want lower fuel or energy use

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 87 vs 74 on efficiency.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 87 vs 79 on dry.

Tire A · Hankook iON evo SUV
Tire B · Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

iON evo SUV or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Which is better in the wet, iON evo SUV or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 84 vs 77 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, iON evo SUV or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 87 vs 79 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, iON evo SUV or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Neither, by our numbers: 76 vs 76 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, iON evo SUV or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 85 vs 71 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, iON evo SUV or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Hankook iON evo SUV, 74 vs 70 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, iON evo SUV or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 87 vs 74 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology