Tests – · none yet Owners 55 · 693 reviews
“New shoes: Hankook Ventus S1 Noble2. 255/40-18”
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 693 + 25 owner reviews. How we score
Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II is ahead, 73–61
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 55 · 693 reviews
“New shoes: Hankook Ventus S1 Noble2. 255/40-18”
Tests – · none yet Owners 75 · 25 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Ventus S1 noble2 | Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 64 (est.) | ≈ 71 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 59 | 76 |
Ventus S1 noble2: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 58.8 = 62
Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 75.5 = 73
No road tests of dry for Ventus S1 noble2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
| Source | Ventus S1 noble2 | Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 68 (est.) | ≈ 76 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 66 | 80 |
Ventus S1 noble2: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 65.7 = 67
Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II: 60% × 75.8 (est.) + 40% × 80 = 77
No road tests of wet for Ventus S1 noble2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Ventus S1 noble2 | Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 61 (est.) | ≈ 70 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 41 | 68 |
Ventus S1 noble2: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 40.8 = 53
Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 68.1 = 69
No road tests of snow for Ventus S1 noble2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
| Source | Ventus S1 noble2 | Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 67 (est.) | ≈ 70 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 62 | 74 |
Ventus S1 noble2: 40% × 67.3 (est.) + 60% × 62.1 = 64
Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II: 40% × 69.8 (est.) + 60% × 74.4 = 73
No road tests of comfort for Ventus S1 noble2 or Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Ventus S1 noble2 | Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | ≈ 66 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | – | 73 |
Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 69
No road tests of noise for Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Ventus S1 noble2 | Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 58 (est.) | ≈ 69 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 44 | 73 |
Ventus S1 noble2: 60% × 58.5 (est.) + 40% × 44.3 = 53
Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 73 = 71
No road tests of treadwear for Ventus S1 noble2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | Ventus S1 noble2 | Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 62 | – |
| Category | Hankook Ventus S1 noble2 | Pirelli Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 61 | 73 |
| Dry | 62 | 73 |
| Wet | 67 | 77 |
| Snow | 53 | 69 |
| Comfort | 64 | 73 |
| Noise | – | 69 |
| Treadwear | 53 | 71 |
| Handling (owners) | 62 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Ventus S1 noble2
Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community sentiment toward the Hankook Ventus S1 noble2 is largely positive, with owners highlighting its competitive price-to-performance value compared to premium alternatives like Michelin. Drivers frequently commend its quiet ride, wet grip, and respectable tread life, though some note reduced handling sharpness compared to dedicated summer tires and increased road noise after higher mileage.
“I put Hankook Ventus S1 Noble2 tires on mine and couldn't be any happier. They rate and perform almost identical to the Michelin Pilots for a lot less money. Very high customer reviews too.”
“Originally Posted By: SHOZ I have them on my Genesis Coupe 2L for a year now. Went to 50 series over the OE 45 series. No complaints at all. I ended up going back and ordering them +1 size. OEM is 215/45/17. I went with 225/45/17. They seem to be better suited and less stretched for my application. Ended up costing $410 total for them.”
“I just drove them this week and they are ok. If you are not an aggressive driver and you are looking for longer tread life and an all season they would work fine. If you want better handling in an all season tire I would look at something like the RE970AS. If I can help let me know.”
Based on 36 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Hankook Ventus S1 noble2 | B · Pirelli Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season | All-Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 8 | 1 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 20″ | 19″ |
| Tread depth | — | 11/32″ |
| UTQG | 320 - 700 AA - B A | 740 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 65,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 44 psi |
Hankook Ventus S1 noble2
Pirelli Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II
Winner: Pirelli Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II — better treadwear, snow and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pirelli Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II scores 71 vs 53 on treadwear.
Pirelli Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II scores 69 vs 53 on snow.
Pirelli Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II scores 73 vs 62 on dry.
Pirelli Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II scores 77 vs 67 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Pirelli Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II, 77 vs 67 on our wet score.
Pirelli Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II, 73 vs 62 on our dry score.
Pirelli Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II, 69 vs 53 on our snow score.
Pirelli Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II, 73 vs 64 on our comfort score.
Pirelli Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II, 71 vs 53 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology