Tests – · none yet Owners 61 · 2,708 reviews
Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 vs Nexen N Blue ECO — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 2,708 + 36 owner reviews. How we score
N Blue ECO leads, 66–63 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 36 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
62
Dry
N Blue ECO +466Why this score
Source Ecowing ES01 KH27 N Blue ECO Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 59 66 Ecowing ES01 KH27: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 58.8 = 62
N Blue ECO: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 65.6 = 66
No road tests of dry for Ecowing ES01 KH27. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for N Blue ECO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
62
Wet
N Blue ECO +769Why this score
Source Ecowing ES01 KH27 N Blue ECO Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 60 69 Ecowing ES01 KH27: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 59.6 = 62
N Blue ECO: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 69.2 = 69
No road tests of wet for Ecowing ES01 KH27. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for N Blue ECO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
68
Comfort
Ecowing ES01 KH27 +266Why this score
Source Ecowing ES01 KH27 N Blue ECO Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 66 63 Ecowing ES01 KH27: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 66.1 = 68
N Blue ECO: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 62.9 = 66
No road tests of comfort for Ecowing ES01 KH27 or N Blue ECO. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Treadwear
Ecowing ES01 KH27 +560Why this score
Source Ecowing ES01 KH27 N Blue ECO Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 64 56 Ecowing ES01 KH27: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 64.1 = 65
N Blue ECO: 60% × 62.8 (est.) + 40% × 56.4 = 60
No road tests of treadwear for Ecowing ES01 KH27. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for N Blue ECO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
59
Handling (owners)
N Blue ECO +766Why this score
Source Ecowing ES01 KH27 N Blue ECO Reviews found online 59 66
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 | Nexen N Blue ECO |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 63 | 66 |
| Dry | 62 | 66 |
| Wet | 62 | 69 |
| Comfort | 68 | 66 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 60 |
| Handling (owners) | 59 | 66 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Ecowing ES01 KH27
N Blue ECO
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Ecowing ES01 KH27 | N Blue ECO | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #6/16 2019 ADAC Summer Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 | #15/16 2013 ACE Summer Touring Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ecowing ES01 KH27
Pros
- Low road noise and quiet operation
- Smooth and comfortable ride quality
- Exceptional value for money and affordable pricing
Cons
- Inconsistent wet weather traction and a tendency to slip on damp roundabouts
- Softer sidewalls that can result in a vague or 'jelly-like' handling feel when pushed
- Lacks confidence for spirited or aggressive driving styles
Tire B N Blue ECO
Pros
- Excellent value for money and budget-friendly purchase price
- Strong grip and handling in both wet and dry conditions
- Good ride comfort and relatively low road noise
Cons
- Rapid or uneven tread wear reported by several users
- Premature rubber cracking and perishing observed over time
- Polarizing opinions on wet weather traction and braking distance
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 | B · Nexen N Blue ECO |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 24 |
| Rim diameters | — | 13″ – 16″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27
Nexen N Blue ECO
Narrow edge: Nexen N Blue ECO — better wet, handling and dry. Pick the Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 if treadwear matters most to you.
Nexen N Blue ECO scores 69 vs 62 on wet.
Nexen N Blue ECO scores 66 vs 59 on handling.
Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 scores 65 vs 60 on treadwear.
Nexen N Blue ECO scores 66 vs 62 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Ecowing ES01 KH27 or N Blue ECO?
Which is better in the wet, Ecowing ES01 KH27 or N Blue ECO?
Nexen N Blue ECO, 69 vs 62 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Ecowing ES01 KH27 or N Blue ECO?
Nexen N Blue ECO, 66 vs 62 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Ecowing ES01 KH27 or N Blue ECO?
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 66 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Ecowing ES01 KH27 or N Blue ECO?
Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27, 65 vs 60 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology