Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S vs Bridgestone Potenza Sport — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 27 + 28 road tests and 6,667 + 735 owner reviews. How we score

Pilot Sport 4 S is ahead, 83–73

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
Tire AMichelin

Pilot Sport 4 S

Summer

± 4

Tests 81 · 27 tests Owners 86 · 6,667 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 15 in 2021 Auto Bild 19 inch Summer Tyre Test (dry braking)

“A note about the pilot sport 4 S: in cold weather (below 5 degrees) even if it isn't icy, the tyre compound hardens and has dramatically reduced grip. They are excellent summer tyres though, good in the wet too. These days I run Uniroyal rainsport 5 and they're very good.”

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Potenza Sport

Summer

± 4

Tests 80 · 28 tests Owners 63 · 735 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 52 in 2025 Summer Tyre Test Shootout (dry braking)

“Replacement tires. Bridgestone Potenza Sport. 8k miles. Fronts/Rears. WTF Bridgestone? Or is it me? No burnouts!”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

Key facts

  • In 9 tests that measured dry braking for both, Pilot Sport 4 S won 3 and Potenza Sport won 6 (average 98% vs 95% of the best).
  • In 9 tests that measured straight aquaplaning for both, Pilot Sport 4 S won 4 and Potenza Sport won 5 (average 97% vs 96% of the best).
  • In 9 tests that measured rolling resistance for both, Pilot Sport 4 S won 9 and Potenza Sport won 0 (average 90% vs 82% of the best).
  • In 8 tests that measured dry handling for both, Pilot Sport 4 S won 3 and Potenza Sport won 2 (average 100% vs 99% of the best).
  • In 8 tests that measured wet braking for both, Pilot Sport 4 S won 5 and Potenza Sport won 3 (average 95% vs 93% of the best).
  1. 93

    Dry

    Pilot Sport 4 S +5
    88
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4 SPotenza Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 25 / 27 tests9596
    Reviews found online9274
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 9 shared tests · wins 3–698%95%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 8 shared tests · wins 3–2100%99%
    Dry Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 1–193%96%
    Dry (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–094%84%
    Subj. Elk Test (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–090%90%
    Dry Subj. Steering Response (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–190%100%
    Subj. Wet Circle (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–180%90%

    Pilot Sport 4 S: 60% × 94.6 + 40% × 91.6 = 93

    Potenza Sport: 60% × 96.3 + 40% × 74.4 = 88

  2. 88

    Wet

    Pilot Sport 4 S +2
    86
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4 SPotenza Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 26 / 27 tests8695
    Reviews found online9072
    Curved Aquaplaning (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 1–393%94%
    Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 9 shared tests · wins 4–597%96%
    Wet Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 0–485%99%
    Wet (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–188%93%
    Wet Lateral Stability (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–180%100%
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 8 shared tests · wins 5–395%93%
    Wet Circle (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 1–388%99%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 8 shared tests · wins 1–796%99%

    Pilot Sport 4 S: 60% × 86 + 40% × 90.4 = 88

    Potenza Sport: 60% × 94.8 + 40% × 72.4 = 86

  3. 78

    Comfort

    Pilot Sport 4 S +20
    58
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4 SPotenza Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 4 tests7054
    Reviews found online8461

    Pilot Sport 4 S: 40% × 70.4 + 60% × 83.5 = 78

    Potenza Sport: 40% × 53.7 + 60% × 60.8 = 58

  4. 69

    Noise

    Pilot Sport 4 S +26
    43
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4 SPotenza Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / 23 tests7030
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)63
    Interior Noise (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–080%80%
    Noise (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 4–099%97%
    Exterior Noise (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–185%88%
    Noise (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–098%90%

    Pilot Sport 4 S: 60% × 70.3 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 69

    Potenza Sport: 60% × 30 + 40% × 62.9 = 43

    No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Sport 4 S. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 72

    Treadwear

    Pilot Sport 4 S +13
    59
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4 SPotenza Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 4 tests7071
    Reviews found online7540

    Pilot Sport 4 S: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 74.8 = 72

    Potenza Sport: 60% × 71.3 + 40% × 39.6 = 59

  6. 90

    Handling (owners)

    Pilot Sport 4 S +16
    74
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4 SPotenza Sport
    Reviews found online9074
  7. 72

    Efficiency

    Pilot Sport 4 S +62
    10
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4 SPotenza Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 23 / 26 tests7210
    Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 9 shared tests · wins 9–090%82%
Scores at a glance
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S vs Bridgestone Potenza Sport: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin Pilot Sport 4 SBridgestone Potenza Sport
Relative Score 83 73
Dry 93 88
Wet 88 86
Comfort 78 58
Noise 69 43
Treadwear 72 59
Handling (owners) 90 74
Efficiency 72 10

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 4

Pilot Sport 4 S

± 4

Potenza Sport

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 10 tests that ran both, Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S finished ahead 8 times and Bridgestone Potenza Sport 2 times.

DisciplineCategoryPilot Sport 4 SPotenza SportΔHead-to-head
Dry Dry 94% 84% +10.2 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 AUTO Straßenverkehr 2023 Summer Tire Test R18 · 225/40R18
Dry Braking Dry 98% 95% +3.0 3–6 in 9 shared tests Newest: 2025 EVO Summer Tyre Test · 235/35 R19
Dry Handling Dry 100% 99% +0.4 3–2 in 8 shared tests Newest: 2025 EVO Summer Tyre Test · 235/35 R19
Dry Handling (tester's mark) Dry 93% 96% −2.8 1–1 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2025 EVO Summer Tyre Test · 235/35 R19
Dry Subj. Steering Response Dry 90% 100% −10.0 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 AUTO Straßenverkehr 2023 Summer Tire Test R18 · 225/40R18
Subj. Elk Test Dry 90% 90% 0.0 0–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 AUTO Straßenverkehr 2023 Summer Tire Test R18 · 225/40R18
Subj. Wet Circle Dry 80% 90% −10.0 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 AUTO Straßenverkehr 2023 Summer Tire Test R18 · 225/40R18
Curved Aquaplaning Wet 93% 94% −0.4 1–3 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2025 EVO Summer Tyre Test · 235/35 R19
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 97% 96% +1.4 4–5 in 9 shared tests Newest: 2025 EVO Summer Tyre Test · 235/35 R19
Wet Wet 88% 93% −5.5 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 AUTO Straßenverkehr 2023 Summer Tire Test R18 · 225/40R18
Wet Braking Wet 95% 93% +2.0 5–3 in 8 shared tests Newest: 2024 Autobild Sportscars Summer TIre Test R20 · 295/30R20
Wet Circle Wet 88% 99% −10.8 1–3 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2024 Autobild Sportscars Summer TIre Test R20 · 295/30R20
Wet Handling Wet 96% 99% −2.6 1–7 in 8 shared tests Newest: 2025 EVO Summer Tyre Test · 235/35 R19
Wet Handling (tester's mark) Wet 85% 99% −14.1 0–4 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2025 EVO Summer Tyre Test · 235/35 R19
Wet Lateral Stability Wet 80% 100% −20.0 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 AUTO Straßenverkehr 2023 Summer Tire Test R18 · 225/40R18
Exterior Noise Noise 85% 88% −3.3 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2024 Autobild Sportscars Summer TIre Test R20 · 295/30R20
Interior Noise Noise 80% 80% 0.0 0–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 AUTO Straßenverkehr 2023 Summer Tire Test R18 · 225/40R18
Noise Noise 99% 97% +1.7 4–0 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2024 Sports Car Tyre Test · 265/35 R19
Noise (tester's mark) Noise 98% 90% +8.2 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2024 EVO Summer Tyre Test · 235/35 R19
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 90% 82% +7.6 9–0 in 9 shared tests Newest: 2025 EVO Summer Tyre Test · 235/35 R19
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 48% 57% −8.9 1–3 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2023 Sport Auto UHP Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Road Rating (tester's mark) Other 100% 95% +4.8 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 EVO Summer Tyre Test · 235/35 R19
Overall Ranking Overall #5/9 #1/9 – 8–2 in 10 shared tests Newest: 2025 EVO Summer Tyre Test · 235/35 R19

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Pilot Sport 4 S

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and predictable handling in both dry and wet conditions
  • Noticeable reduction in road noise and improved ride comfort compared to competitors and run-flats
  • Sharper steering response and improved cornering stability

Cons

  • High initial purchase price
  • Rapid tread wear reported by some aggressive drivers and track users
  • Soft sidewalls can cause a slightly vague or laggy initial response during rapid steering transitions
All owner themes in the Pilot Sport 4 S review

Tire B Potenza Sport

Pros

  • Outstanding dry and wet grip
  • Precise, telepathic steering response and feedback
  • Excellent braking performance

Cons

  • Fast tread wear and short lifespan
  • High road noise
  • Firm, sometimes harsh ride quality over bumps
All owner themes in the Potenza Sport review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

Positive

The community widely regards the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S as a benchmark max-performance summer tire, praising its outstanding dry and wet grip, stability, and daily driving refinement. Common criticisms focus on its premium price, rapid tread wear on high-powered heavy vehicles or hot track sessions, and significantly reduced grip in cold weather. Many enthusiasts consider it an ideal street tire, though some note softer sidewalls compared to predecessors or recommend dedicated track tires for hard circuit driving.

Top themes
#Wet and dry grip#Track day durability#High price vs alternatives#Tread life and wear#Cold weather performance#Sidewall stiffness and comfort

Based on 208 community posts

Tire B

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Mixed

The community praises the Bridgestone Potenza Sport for its exceptional dry and wet grip, sharp steering response, and value pricing compared to competitors. However, users frequently highlight drawbacks such as fast tread wear and poor durability when used for track days, along with some complaints regarding lower fuel economy and narrower physical dimensions.

r/fordfusion ·2 upvotes ·2026-09-16

“Just replaced my set of Potenza Sport AS. 2 side wall failures with 70% tread left. Replaced them with Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 4s. Michelin's are a much better riding tire than the Bridgestones. A little more road noise though.”

mustang6g.com ·2023-04-05

“Just moved to set a set of CSC7's. 265/35/20 and 305/30/20. They were a really good price. I moved from the Bridgestone Potenza Sport which is also a great tyre, but it becomes unpredicatable sub 12ºC or so, which is a shame. So far, the Conti's have been great and I'm keen to see how they handle the supercharger. The latest reviews of the CSC7 are really good - scooping all the top spots. Sadly the PS4S is old in comparison now, which can be seen in recent reviews with the new Goodyeaar Eage F1 Asymetric 6 and Pirelli P Zero PZ4 often ranking above the Michelin in test scores. That's not to say the Michelin has suddenly become bad - it is still a great tyre, it is just that there are now alternatives out there; most likely why the new Pilot Sport S 5 is coming soon.”

r/mazda6 ·29 upvotes ·2023-04-08

“Trying Bridgestone Potenza Sports for summers with simple Spirt Edition A19 wheels Last fall I put Blizzaks WS90s on the stock rims, and had a confident time this winter. I love the stock Mazda rims and intended to swap on a set of performance summer tires. However decide to go with aftermarket wheels that match the stock as much as I could afford, so here they are. 19X8 SPORT EDITION A19 DARK GREY 225/45R-19 BRIDGESTONE POTENZA SPORT I love the look of the new rims maybe even more than the stock now that they are on simple as they are. Will have to see how the tires behave. I may decide to go back to a set of Conti DwS HiPer All-Seasons next year. Read more”

Top themes
#Steering response and feel#Dry and wet grip#Tread wear and longevity#Track performance limitations#Price and value

Based on 93 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S B · Bridgestone Potenza Sport
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available110128
Rim diameters17″ – 22″16″ – 24″
Tread depth—7 - 10/32″
UTQG300 A - AA A200 - 320 A - AA A
Sidewall—Black Side Wall - Raised Black Lettering
Max pressure—50 - 51 psi
Sizes in common7171

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S — better efficiency, noise and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want lower fuel or energy use

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S scores 72 vs 10 on efficiency.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S scores 69 vs 43 on noise.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S scores 78 vs 58 on comfort.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S scores 90 vs 74 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet handling

Bridgestone Potenza Sport won 7 of 8 shared wet handling tests.

Tire A · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
Tire B · Bridgestone Potenza Sport

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Pilot Sport 4 S or Potenza Sport?

Which is better in the wet, Pilot Sport 4 S or Potenza Sport?

Neither, by our numbers: 88 vs 86 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Pilot Sport 4 S or Potenza Sport?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S, 93 vs 88 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, Pilot Sport 4 S or Potenza Sport?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S, 69 vs 43 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Pilot Sport 4 S or Potenza Sport?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S, 78 vs 58 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Pilot Sport 4 S or Potenza Sport?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S, 72 vs 59 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Pilot Sport 4 S or Potenza Sport?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S, 72 vs 10 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology