Tests 63 · 2 tests Owners 68 · 4 reviews
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R vs Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Pilot Sport Cup 2 R leads, 67–65 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 10 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
79
Dry
Pilot Sport Cup 2 R +1168Why this score
Source Pilot Sport Cup 2 R ADVAN Neova AD07 Professional tests (TWG score) 78 – Reviews found online 81 68 -
51
Wet
ADVAN Neova AD07 +1768Why this score
Source Pilot Sport Cup 2 R ADVAN Neova AD07 Professional tests (TWG score) 48 – Reviews found online 55 67 -
–
Snow
No comparison62Why this score
Source Pilot Sport Cup 2 R ADVAN Neova AD07 Reviews found online – 57 -
73
Comfort
Pilot Sport Cup 2 R +1063Why this score
Source Pilot Sport Cup 2 R ADVAN Neova AD07 Reviews found online 77 57 -
65
Noise
Level65Why this score
Source Pilot Sport Cup 2 R ADVAN Neova AD07 Reviews found online 62 63 -
63
Treadwear
Pilot Sport Cup 2 R +459Why this score
Source Pilot Sport Cup 2 R ADVAN Neova AD07 Reviews found online 61 55 -
79
Handling
Pilot Sport Cup 2 R +1069Why this score
Source Pilot Sport Cup 2 R ADVAN Neova AD07 Reviews found online 79 69
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R | Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 65 |
| Dry | 79 | 68 |
| Wet | 51 | 68 |
| Snow | – | 62 |
| Comfort | 73 | 63 |
| Noise | 65 | 65 |
| Treadwear | 63 | 59 |
| Handling | 79 | 69 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Pilot Sport Cup 2 R
ADVAN Neova AD07
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Pilot Sport Cup 2 R
Pros
- Phenomenal dry grip providing a planted and confident feel on the track
- Optimized design specifically for extracting maximum performance during time attacks
- Superior circuit performance compared to the standard Pilot Sport Cup 2
Cons
- Extremely limited performance longevity, with grip dropping off rapidly after just a few laps
- Poor performance and safety risks in damp to wet conditions due to shallow and narrow tread patterns
- Best suited strictly for single-lap time trials rather than extended track sessions
Tire B ADVAN Neova AD07
Pros
- Stunning and reliable dry grip
- Incredibly progressive breakaway behavior that is easy to control
- Exceptional steering feedback and stability at high speeds
Cons
- High price point relative to overall value
- Subpar wet-weather traction and traction loss under heavy acceleration
- Noticeable road noise ('rumble') and a stiff, uncomfortable ride quality
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R | B · Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | — | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 180 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
Which one should you actually buy?
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R — better dry, comfort and handling. Pick the Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07 if wet matters most to you.
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07 scores 68 vs 51 on wet.
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R scores 79 vs 68 on dry.
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R scores 73 vs 63 on comfort.
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R scores 79 vs 69 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.