tirewheelguide

Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R vs Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 0 road tests and 4 + 10 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Pilot Sport Cup 2 R 64, ADVAN Neova AD07 65.

Check price on Amazon · Pilot Sport Cup 2 R Check price on Amazon · ADVAN Neova AD07
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R
Tire AMichelin

Pilot Sport Cup 2 R

Summer

± 7

Tests 63 · 2 tests Owners 63 · 4 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 6 in The BEST Track Day Tyres for 2024 (dry braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 77

    Dry

    Pilot Sport Cup 2 R +10
    67
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport Cup 2 RADVAN Neova AD07
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests79≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7466

    Pilot Sport Cup 2 R: 60% × 79.3 + 40% × 73.5 = 77

    ADVAN Neova AD07: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 65.9 = 67

    No road tests of dry for ADVAN Neova AD07. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 53

    Wet

    ADVAN Neova AD07 +14
    67
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport Cup 2 RADVAN Neova AD07
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests46≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6366

    Pilot Sport Cup 2 R: 60% × 45.9 + 40% × 63.1 = 53

    ADVAN Neova AD07: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 66.2 = 67

    No road tests of wet for ADVAN Neova AD07. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    62
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport Cup 2 RADVAN Neova AD07
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online–55

    ADVAN Neova AD07: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 55.3 = 62

    No road tests of snow for ADVAN Neova AD07. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 70

    Comfort

    Pilot Sport Cup 2 R +11
    59
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport Cup 2 RADVAN Neova AD07
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7154

    Pilot Sport Cup 2 R: 40% × 69.1 (est.) + 60% × 71 = 70

    ADVAN Neova AD07: 40% × 65.7 (est.) + 60% × 53.9 = 59

    No road tests of comfort for Pilot Sport Cup 2 R or ADVAN Neova AD07. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    64
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport Cup 2 RADVAN Neova AD07
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online–61

    ADVAN Neova AD07: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 60.5 = 64

    No road tests of noise for ADVAN Neova AD07. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 54

    Treadwear

    ADVAN Neova AD07 +4
    58
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport Cup 2 RADVAN Neova AD07
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 59 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online4653

    Pilot Sport Cup 2 R: 60% × 59 (est.) + 40% × 45.6 = 54

    ADVAN Neova AD07: 60% × 61.8 (est.) + 40% × 53.4 = 58

    No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Sport Cup 2 R. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for ADVAN Neova AD07. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 73

    Handling (owners)

    Pilot Sport Cup 2 R +6
    67
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport Cup 2 RADVAN Neova AD07
    Reviews found online7367
Scores at a glance
CategoryMichelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 RYokohama ADVAN Neova AD07
Relative Score 64 65
Dry 77 67
Wet 53 67
Snow – 62
Comfort 70 59
Noise – 64
Treadwear 54 58
Handling (owners) 73 67

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Pilot Sport Cup 2 R

± 8

ADVAN Neova AD07

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Pilot Sport Cup 2 R

Pros

  • Phenomenal dry grip providing a planted and confident feel on the track
  • Optimized design specifically for extracting maximum performance during time attacks
  • Superior circuit performance compared to the standard Pilot Sport Cup 2

Cons

  • Extremely limited performance longevity, with grip dropping off rapidly after just a few laps
  • Poor performance and safety risks in damp to wet conditions due to shallow and narrow tread patterns
  • Best suited strictly for single-lap time trials rather than extended track sessions
All owner themes in the Pilot Sport Cup 2 R review

Tire B ADVAN Neova AD07

Pros

  • Stunning and reliable dry grip
  • Incredibly progressive breakaway behavior that is easy to control
  • Exceptional steering feedback and stability at high speeds

Cons

  • High price point relative to overall value
  • Subpar wet-weather traction and traction loss under heavy acceleration
  • Noticeable road noise ('rumble') and a stiff, uncomfortable ride quality
All owner themes in the ADVAN Neova AD07 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R B · Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available71
Rim diameters20″ – 21″16″
Tread depth—9/32″
UTQG140 A - B A180 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R

Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07

Too close to call: Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R and Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07 are within 2 points overall. Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R is stronger on comfort, dry and handling. Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07 is stronger on wet and treadwear. Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07 scores 67 vs 53 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R scores 70 vs 59 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R scores 77 vs 67 on dry.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R scores 73 vs 67 on handling.

Tire A · Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Pilot Sport Cup 2 R or ADVAN Neova AD07?

Which is better in the wet, Pilot Sport Cup 2 R or ADVAN Neova AD07?

Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07, 67 vs 53 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Pilot Sport Cup 2 R or ADVAN Neova AD07?

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R, 77 vs 67 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Pilot Sport Cup 2 R or ADVAN Neova AD07?

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R, 70 vs 59 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Pilot Sport Cup 2 R or ADVAN Neova AD07?

Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07, 58 vs 54 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology