Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 12 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Nexen Arrowspeed CP661 vs Nexen N Fera SU4 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 12 + 80 owner reviews. How we score
N Fera SU4 is ahead, 78–69
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 81 · 80 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
N Fera SU4 +1179Why this score
Source Arrowspeed CP661 N Fera SU4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 75 (est.) Reviews found online 69 85 Arrowspeed CP661: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.7 = 68
N Fera SU4: 60% × 75.2 (est.) + 40% × 85.1 = 79
No road tests of dry for Arrowspeed CP661. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for N Fera SU4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
71
Wet
N Fera SU4 +1081Why this score
Source Arrowspeed CP661 N Fera SU4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 79 (est.) Reviews found online 71 85 Arrowspeed CP661: 60% × 70.8 (est.) + 40% × 70.8 = 71
N Fera SU4: 60% × 78.7 (est.) + 40% × 85.2 = 81
No road tests of wet for Arrowspeed CP661. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for N Fera SU4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
67
Comfort
N Fera SU4 +1077Why this score
Source Arrowspeed CP661 N Fera SU4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 67 80 Arrowspeed CP661: 40% × 68.7 (est.) + 60% × 66.7 = 67
N Fera SU4: 40% × 71.1 (est.) + 60% × 80.2 = 77
No road tests of comfort for Arrowspeed CP661 or N Fera SU4. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
68
Treadwear
N Fera SU4 +371Why this score
Source Arrowspeed CP661 N Fera SU4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 69 74 Arrowspeed CP661: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 68
N Fera SU4: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 73.7 = 71
No road tests of treadwear for Arrowspeed CP661. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for N Fera SU4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
69
Handling (owners)
N Fera SU4 +1180Why this score
Source Arrowspeed CP661 N Fera SU4 Reviews found online 69 80
Scores at a glance
| Category | Nexen Arrowspeed CP661 | Nexen N Fera SU4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 78 |
| Dry | 68 | 79 |
| Wet | 71 | 81 |
| Comfort | 67 | 77 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 71 |
| Handling (owners) | 69 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
69
/ 100
Arrowspeed CP661
78
/ 100
N Fera SU4
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Arrowspeed CP661
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
- High tread longevity and durability on light vehicles
- Predictable handling in both wet and dry conditions
Cons
- Reports of premature sidewall cracking or splitting
- Performance limitations during high-speed wet weather driving
- Initial 'loose' feeling during the break-in period
Tire B N Fera SU4
Pros
- Outstanding value for money compared to major premium brands
- High level of ride comfort and low road noise
- Reliable and predictable grip in both dry and wet conditions
Cons
- Softer sidewalls can lead to less precise steering feedback and body roll during aggressive cornering
- Average or faster-than-expected treadwear for some driving styles
- Can become harder and noisier as the tire ages or wears down
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Nexen Arrowspeed CP661 | B · Nexen N Fera SU4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
69
/ 100
Nexen Arrowspeed CP661
78
/ 100
Nexen N Fera SU4
Winner: Nexen N Fera SU4 — better dry, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Nexen Arrowspeed CP661 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 79 vs 68 on dry.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 80 vs 69 on handling.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 81 vs 71 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 77 vs 67 on comfort.
Tire A · Nexen Arrowspeed CP661
Tire B · Nexen N Fera SU4
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Arrowspeed CP661 or N Fera SU4?
Which is better in the wet, Arrowspeed CP661 or N Fera SU4?
Nexen N Fera SU4, 81 vs 71 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Arrowspeed CP661 or N Fera SU4?
Nexen N Fera SU4, 79 vs 68 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Arrowspeed CP661 or N Fera SU4?
Nexen N Fera SU4, 77 vs 67 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Arrowspeed CP661 or N Fera SU4?
Nexen N Fera SU4, 71 vs 68 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology