Tests – · none yet Owners 82 · 237 reviews
“I ran Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta on my IS350 15 years ago and absolutely loved them! Unless their quality has gone down since then I I wouldn’t hesitate to run them again.”
Head-to-head
Updated
Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta vs Yokohama ADVAN A052 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 4 road tests and 237 + 213 owner reviews. How we score
Ultrac Sessanta is ahead, 80–72
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 76 · 4 tests Owners 69 · 213 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 7 in 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test (dry handling (tester's mark))
“Staggered BBSs Need Tires I have a set of BBS wheels that i have been restoring for my 89 944 NA. I am trying to figure out what tires to get and am running into a bit of trouble. The set of BBSs are 15in staggered. The front are 8in wide and the rear are 9in wide. When i had purchased these wheels they had 215/60R15s all around. Would this be a good fitment? I am hoping the rear will not look stretched. As i was researching staggered tires i ran into problems finding a matching set in the sizes 225 50R15 and 205 55R15. A local shop helped me find these for the front Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 (205 55R15) and these for the rear Yokohama ADVAN A052 (225 50R15). Im concerned to get these due to the tread pattern being drastically different. Another shop has Kumho Ecsta 4x KU22 picked out for the front. I would like to have performance summer tires that do not break the bank. If i were to do 215/60R15s all around i was looking at Falken Sincera SN250 A/S (which are not performance) or Vredestein Sprint Classic which i am not sure of. I am a bit at a loss here and would greatly appreciate any advice or help selecting tires as this is not something i am comfortable with given the lack of options at this wheel size.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
80
Dry
Level80Why this score
Source Ultrac Sessanta ADVAN A052 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests ≈ 76 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 87 90 Ultrac Sessanta: 60% × 75.9 (est.) + 40% × 86.7 = 80
ADVAN A052: 60% × 73.1 + 40% × 90.4 = 80
No road tests of dry for Ultrac Sessanta. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
83
Wet
Ultrac Sessanta +974Why this score
Source Ultrac Sessanta ADVAN A052 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests ≈ 80 (est.) 78 Reviews found online 87 67 Ultrac Sessanta: 60% × 79.9 (est.) + 40% × 87.2 = 83
ADVAN A052: 60% × 78 + 40% × 67.4 = 74
No road tests of wet for Ultrac Sessanta. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison73Why this score
Source Ultrac Sessanta ADVAN A052 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online – 75 ADVAN A052: 60% × 72.2 (est.) + 40% × 74.6 = 73
No road tests of snow for ADVAN A052. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
77
Comfort
Ultrac Sessanta +968Why this score
Source Ultrac Sessanta ADVAN A052 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 71 (est.) 75 Reviews found online 81 63 Ultrac Sessanta: 40% × 71.3 (est.) + 60% × 80.9 = 77
ADVAN A052: 40% × 74.5 + 60% × 63.4 = 68
No road tests of comfort for Ultrac Sessanta. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison77Why this score
Source Ultrac Sessanta ADVAN A052 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 77 Reviews found online – 77 ADVAN A052: 60% × 77 + 40% × 76.9 = 77
-
71
Treadwear
Ultrac Sessanta +2150Why this score
Source Ultrac Sessanta ADVAN A052 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 57 (est.) Reviews found online 73 39 Ultrac Sessanta: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 73.4 = 71
ADVAN A052: 60% × 56.7 (est.) + 40% × 39.3 = 50
No road tests of treadwear for Ultrac Sessanta. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for ADVAN A052. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
85
Handling (owners)
Level85Why this score
Source Ultrac Sessanta ADVAN A052 Reviews found online 85 85
Scores at a glance
| Category | Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta | Yokohama ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 80 | 72 |
| Dry | 80 | 80 |
| Wet | 83 | 74 |
| Snow | – | 73 |
| Comfort | 77 | 68 |
| Noise | – | 77 |
| Treadwear | 71 | 50 |
| Handling (owners) | 85 | 85 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
80
/ 100
Ultrac Sessanta
72
/ 100
ADVAN A052
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ultrac Sessanta
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry traction
- High value-for-money ratio compared to premium competitors
- Predictable and progressive handling characteristics
Cons
- Inconsistent tread life, with many users reporting rapid wear
- Increased road noise, often described as a drone or bearing-like sound
- Poor performance in snow and icy conditions
Tire B ADVAN A052
Pros
- Class-leading dry grip and traction, often compared to dedicated racing slicks.
- Rapid warm-up time, providing peak performance almost immediately.
- Surprisingly high levels of wet-weather traction and hydroplaning resistance for a performance tire.
Cons
- Rapid tread wear, especially when used on heavy vehicles or without aggressive camber settings.
- Tendency to 'grease up' or lose performance during long, high-intensity track sessions.
- Soft sidewall construction can lead to vague steering feel or 'sponginess' compared to stiffer competitors.
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Positive
Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta
Community opinion on the Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta is overwhelmingly positive, with drivers praising its high value, impressive wet and dry grip, and smooth, quiet ride compared to stiff run-flat tires. While a few noted soft sidewalls or increased noise late in the tread life, the tire developed a strong reputation for offering high-end performance at an affordable price point.
corvetteforum.com
“I have them also. I love them. I haven't raced with them and my car is a daily driver. But I take some nice mountain twisty roads on the way to work along with highway roads and it preforms great anywhere. Also not so bad in the rain. Overall I love these tires for the price. I would recommend them to anyone. I'm hopping to get some fresh pics soon. Mine are 18/19. Here are some old photos on my old rims. I have the same tires on my new rims (18/19 C6Z deep dish, black with polished lip).”
team-bhp.com
“Quote: Originally Posted by anandpadhye Local manufacturing is the news but isn't the brand already available in India? Very right, Anand. They were available in select sizes (mostly the Sportrac range) throughout, but looks like Apollo has now brought in the 16 - 20" moulds to make them here. They have some exquisite tread patterns, especially the Ultrac Sessanta. But better to see their reliability under Indian conditions and then buy a set.”
5series.net
“Yesterday was the first time I'd driven the car more than 2 miles since making the switch from the RFT RE050A's to the ultrac sessanta's. Covered 50 miles on A roads and Motorways. Overall impressions were good, the car was less harsh over broken surfaces. I had no feeling of road camber effecting the steering. I noticed on jacking the car that the sidewalls are pretty soft, I added a few PSI over the stock settings. You still feel all the bumps as is to be expected on 40 profile tyres, just less intrusive. I still have to drive on B roads but so far so good. Jason”
Top themes
#Ride Comfort and Noise#Price and Value#Dry and Wet Grip#Unique Tread Pattern#Transition from Run-Flats
Based on 55 community posts
Tire B
Positive
Yokohama ADVAN A052
Community members widely view the Yokohama ADVAN A052 as a top-tier, high-grip competition tire suited for autocross and track driving. While praised for its light weight and superior all-out performance compared to standard street and summer tires, users frequently discuss its high cost, soft compound, potential lack of tread longevity on long road trips, and tendency to fling rocks.
r/tires
·2 upvotes ·2023-07-04
“Long trip with Advans A052? I'm planning a trip to the Nürburgring to attend a trackday this October. The problem is that I live 1300 km away, so the tyres should be able to cope with that, some 20 laps at medium-fast pace at the Nordschleife, and the drive back home. Are the Advan A052 tyres way to soft for such a long trip? Will they last? Wouldn't it be wiser to settle for a more conservative set of Michelins PS4? The car is a 1986 Porsche 911 Carrera, 1210 kg... Read more”
northamericanmotoring.com
“I went with Yokohama ADVAN A052 225/45/17s for AUTOx They are more expensive but they are definitely lighter than the N2s...20.6#s vs ~25#s from what I found on the internet.”
r/tires
·9 upvotes ·2020-01-18
“Yokohama ADVAN A052 315/30R18 and 265/35R18 - BEEFY!”
Top themes
#competition and autocross performance#tire weight comparison#track day durability#soft compound longevity#200 treadwear grip#fitment and sizing
Based on 11 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta | B · Yokohama ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 61 |
| Rim diameters | — | 13″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 7/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 200 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
80
/ 100
Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta
72
/ 100
Yokohama ADVAN A052
Winner: Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta — better treadwear, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta scores 71 vs 50 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta scores 83 vs 74 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta scores 77 vs 68 on comfort.
Tire A · Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN A052
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Ultrac Sessanta or ADVAN A052?
Which is better in the wet, Ultrac Sessanta or ADVAN A052?
Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta, 83 vs 74 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Ultrac Sessanta or ADVAN A052?
Neither, by our numbers: 80 vs 80 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Ultrac Sessanta or ADVAN A052?
Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta, 77 vs 68 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Ultrac Sessanta or ADVAN A052?
Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta, 71 vs 50 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology