Tests – · none yet Owners 82 · 237 reviews
“I ran Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta on my IS350 15 years ago and absolutely loved them! Unless their quality has gone down since then I I wouldn’t hesitate to run them again.”
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 5 road tests and 237 + 213 owner reviews. How we score
Ultrac Sessanta is ahead, 79–72
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 82 · 237 reviews
“I ran Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta on my IS350 15 years ago and absolutely loved them! Unless their quality has gone down since then I I wouldn’t hesitate to run them again.”
Tests 76 · 5 tests Owners 68 · 213 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 7 in 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test (dry handling (tester's mark))
“Staggered BBSs Need Tires I have a set of BBS wheels that i have been restoring for my 89 944 NA. I am trying to figure out what tires to get and am running into a bit of trouble. The set of BBSs are 15in staggered. The front are 8in wide and the rear are 9in wide. When i had purchased these wheels they had 215/60R15s all around. Would this be a good fitment? I am hoping the rear will not look stretched. As i was researching staggered tires i ran into problems finding a matching set in the sizes 225 50R15 and 205 55R15. A local shop helped me find these for the front Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 (205 55R15) and these for the rear Yokohama ADVAN A052 (225 50R15). Im concerned to get these due to the tread pattern being drastically different. Another shop has Kumho Ecsta 4x KU22 picked out for the front. I would like to have performance summer tires that do not break the bank. If i were to do 215/60R15s all around i was looking at Falken Sincera SN250 A/S (which are not performance) or Vredestein Sprint Classic which i am not sure of. I am a bit at a loss here and would greatly appreciate any advice or help selecting tires as this is not something i am comfortable with given the lack of options at this wheel size.”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Ultrac Sessanta | ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests | ≈ 76 (est.) | 74 |
| Reviews found online | 86 | 90 |
Ultrac Sessanta: 60% × 75.5 (est.) + 40% × 86.2 = 80
ADVAN A052: 60% × 73.6 + 40% × 90 = 80
No road tests of dry for Ultrac Sessanta. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
| Source | Ultrac Sessanta | ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests | ≈ 80 (est.) | 78 |
| Reviews found online | 87 | 67 |
Ultrac Sessanta: 60% × 79.7 (est.) + 40% × 87.1 = 83
ADVAN A052: 60% × 77.8 + 40% × 67 = 73
No road tests of wet for Ultrac Sessanta. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Ultrac Sessanta | ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | ≈ 72 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | – | 74 |
ADVAN A052: 60% × 71.7 (est.) + 40% × 74 = 73
No road tests of snow for ADVAN A052. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
| Source | Ultrac Sessanta | ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests | ≈ 71 (est.) | 74 |
| Reviews found online | 80 | 63 |
Ultrac Sessanta: 40% × 71.1 (est.) + 60% × 80.2 = 77
ADVAN A052: 40% × 74 + 60% × 62.7 = 67
No road tests of comfort for Ultrac Sessanta. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
| Source | Ultrac Sessanta | ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests | – | 77 |
| Reviews found online | – | 76 |
ADVAN A052: 60% × 76.6 + 40% × 76.4 = 76
| Source | Ultrac Sessanta | ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 69 (est.) | ≈ 57 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 74 | 40 |
Ultrac Sessanta: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 73.6 = 71
ADVAN A052: 60% × 56.9 (est.) + 40% × 39.5 = 50
No road tests of treadwear for Ultrac Sessanta. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for ADVAN A052. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | Ultrac Sessanta | ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 84 | 84 |
| Category | Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta | Yokohama ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 79 | 72 |
| Dry | 80 | 80 |
| Wet | 83 | 73 |
| Snow | – | 73 |
| Comfort | 77 | 67 |
| Noise | – | 76 |
| Treadwear | 71 | 50 |
| Handling (owners) | 84 | 84 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Ultrac Sessanta
ADVAN A052
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community opinion on the Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta is overwhelmingly positive, with drivers praising its high value, impressive wet and dry grip, and smooth, quiet ride compared to stiff run-flat tires. While a few noted soft sidewalls or increased noise late in the tread life, the tire developed a strong reputation for offering high-end performance at an affordable price point.
“I just had a set of Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta put on. Initial thoughts... I got them in 275/40/20 for the fronts and 315/35/20 for the rears. They fit the wheels perfectly. I immediately noticed a much softer ride. Sport Mode now feels like Tour Mode, maybe even softer. I DD my ZL1 so cold weather performance is very important. Temps were near 40°F and they stayed quite grippy. This is a huge improvement over the stock Goodyear's. Initial turn in response is good. I had the opportunity to push them on an off ramp and they felt a little mushy when pushed and didn't seem to want to exceed .75g I had a set of these on a previous car (2004 ZO6) and expect great wet weather performance. I will update this post once I get some more miles on them.”
“Quote: Originally Posted by Untertürkheim Sorry, but I must disagree. I found these tires to be very bad in the rain, I ended up replacing them very early for that reason alone. That's odd. The Ultrac Sessanta? The Vreds were much better than the Conti 2 I had on my Bimmer. I live in LA, but in Pacific Palisades where we get dumps of rain often in the winter. No hydroplaning, great feeling of stability. On other forums, the Vreds are normally considered good in the wet. btw, there are 20 pages about this tire on the Corvette forum here: Here's just one quote on that long thread: "As for the RAIN.. They are insane on the rain.. no slipping, or gliding, only traction" And another: "Drove through a monsoon in Redding, CA on the way down and no hydroplaining and my buddy following me said the water seeemd to come out behind the car and not spread sideways as you normally see." I had the same experience. So, maybe they just don't work well on a MB(??)”
“Originally Posted by CBR.worm I ran a couple set of the Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta tires, they were great - super sticky wet and dry and smooth. Unfortunately, they stopped making them in my size a few years ago. I was very happy with them. I know they are totally different than what you are looking at, but there isn't a lot of info out there (here in the US) about the brand. Is your tire size 235/45-18? They don't make the Sessanta in any size anymore! It is an older, now discontinued line. Vredestein does offer both the Ultrac Satin and Ultrac Vorti in your size 235/45-18”
Based on 55 community posts
The community regards the Yokohama ADVAN A052 as a top-tier, high-performance competition tire that offers exceptional dry grip and competitive edge in autocross and track settings. Users frequently compare them favorably against other extreme performance tires like the Bridgestone RE-71R/RE-71RS, though questions remain regarding their longevity for long-distance road trips.
“I went with Yokohama ADVAN A052 225/45/17s for AUTOx They are more expensive but they are definitely lighter than the N2s...20.6#s vs ~25#s from what I found on the internet.”
“Staggered BBSs Need Tires I have a set of BBS wheels that i have been restoring for my 89 944 NA. I am trying to figure out what tires to get and am running into a bit of trouble. The set of BBSs are 15in staggered. The front are 8in wide and the rear are 9in wide. When i had purchased these wheels they had 215/60R15s all around. Would this be a good fitment? I am hoping the rear will not look stretched. As i was researching staggered tires i ran into problems finding a matching set in the sizes 225 50R15 and 205 55R15. A local shop helped me find these for the front Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 (205 55R15) and these for the rear Yokohama ADVAN A052 (225 50R15). Im concerned to get these due to the tread pattern being drastically different. Another shop has Kumho Ecsta 4x KU22 picked out for the front. I would like to have performance summer tires that do not break the bank. If i were to do 215/60R15s all around i was looking at Falken Sincera SN250 A/S (which are not performance) or Vredestein Sprint Classic which i am not sure of. I am a bit at a loss here and would greatly appreciate any advice or help selecting tires as this is not something i am comfortable with given the lack of options at this wheel size.”
“Long trip with Advans A052? I'm planning a trip to the Nürburgring to attend a trackday this October. The problem is that I live 1300 km away, so the tyres should be able to cope with that, some 20 laps at medium-fast pace at the Nordschleife, and the drive back home. Are the Advan A052 tyres way to soft for such a long trip? Will they last? Wouldn't it be wiser to settle for a more conservative set of Michelins PS4? The car is a 1986 Porsche 911 Carrera, 1210 kg... Read more”
Based on 12 community posts
| Attribute | A · Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta | B · Yokohama ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 61 |
| Rim diameters | — | 13″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 7/32″ |
| UTQG | 280 AA A | 200 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta
Yokohama ADVAN A052
Winner: Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta — better treadwear, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta scores 71 vs 50 on treadwear.
Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta scores 83 vs 73 on wet.
Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta scores 77 vs 67 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta, 83 vs 73 on our wet score.
Neither, by our numbers: 80 vs 80 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta, 77 vs 67 on our comfort score.
Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta, 71 vs 50 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology