Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 10 reviews
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07 vs Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Pilot Sport Cup 2 R leads, 67–65 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 63 · 2 tests Owners 68 · 4 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
Pilot Sport Cup 2 R +1179Why this score
Source ADVAN Neova AD07 Pilot Sport Cup 2 R Professional tests (TWG score) – 78 Reviews found online 68 81 -
68
Wet
ADVAN Neova AD07 +1751Why this score
Source ADVAN Neova AD07 Pilot Sport Cup 2 R Professional tests (TWG score) – 48 Reviews found online 67 55 -
62
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source ADVAN Neova AD07 Pilot Sport Cup 2 R Reviews found online 57 – -
63
Comfort
Pilot Sport Cup 2 R +1073Why this score
Source ADVAN Neova AD07 Pilot Sport Cup 2 R Reviews found online 57 77 -
65
Noise
Level65Why this score
Source ADVAN Neova AD07 Pilot Sport Cup 2 R Reviews found online 63 62 -
59
Treadwear
Pilot Sport Cup 2 R +463Why this score
Source ADVAN Neova AD07 Pilot Sport Cup 2 R Reviews found online 55 61 -
69
Handling
Pilot Sport Cup 2 R +1079Why this score
Source ADVAN Neova AD07 Pilot Sport Cup 2 R Reviews found online 69 79
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07 | Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 67 |
| Dry | 68 | 79 |
| Wet | 68 | 51 |
| Snow | 62 | – |
| Comfort | 63 | 73 |
| Noise | 65 | 65 |
| Treadwear | 59 | 63 |
| Handling | 69 | 79 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
ADVAN Neova AD07
Pilot Sport Cup 2 R
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ADVAN Neova AD07
Pros
- Stunning and reliable dry grip
- Incredibly progressive breakaway behavior that is easy to control
- Exceptional steering feedback and stability at high speeds
Cons
- High price point relative to overall value
- Subpar wet-weather traction and traction loss under heavy acceleration
- Noticeable road noise ('rumble') and a stiff, uncomfortable ride quality
Tire B Pilot Sport Cup 2 R
Pros
- Phenomenal dry grip providing a planted and confident feel on the track
- Optimized design specifically for extracting maximum performance during time attacks
- Superior circuit performance compared to the standard Pilot Sport Cup 2
Cons
- Extremely limited performance longevity, with grip dropping off rapidly after just a few laps
- Poor performance and safety risks in damp to wet conditions due to shallow and narrow tread patterns
- Best suited strictly for single-lap time trials rather than extended track sessions
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07 | B · Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 180 A A | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R — better dry, comfort and handling. Pick the Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07 if wet matters most to you.
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07 scores 68 vs 51 on wet.
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R scores 79 vs 68 on dry.
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R scores 73 vs 63 on comfort.
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R scores 79 vs 69 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.