Tests 70 · 4 tests Owners 67 · 497 reviews
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 vs Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
ADVAN Sport V105 is ahead, 68–55
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 48 · 79 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
73
Dry
ADVAN Sport V105 +1657Why this score
Source ADVAN Sport V105 Potenza S001 RFT Professional tests (TWG score) 72 – Reviews found online 74 51 -
72
Wet
ADVAN Sport V105 +1359Why this score
Source ADVAN Sport V105 Potenza S001 RFT Professional tests (TWG score) 72 – Reviews found online 72 55 -
60
Snow
ADVAN Sport V105 +1842Why this score
Source ADVAN Sport V105 Potenza S001 RFT Reviews found online 54 23 -
68
Comfort
ADVAN Sport V105 +1454Why this score
Source ADVAN Sport V105 Potenza S001 RFT Reviews found online 67 39 -
58
Noise
Potenza S001 RFT +159Why this score
Source ADVAN Sport V105 Potenza S001 RFT Professional tests (TWG score) 54 – Reviews found online 65 49 -
67
Treadwear
ADVAN Sport V105 +958Why this score
Source ADVAN Sport V105 Potenza S001 RFT Professional tests (TWG score) 70 – Reviews found online 62 53 -
71
Handling
ADVAN Sport V105 +2051Why this score
Source ADVAN Sport V105 Potenza S001 RFT Reviews found online 71 51
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 | Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 55 |
| Dry | 73 | 57 |
| Wet | 72 | 59 |
| Snow | 60 | 42 |
| Comfort | 68 | 54 |
| Noise | 58 | 59 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 58 |
| Handling | 71 | 51 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ADVAN Sport V105
Potenza S001 RFT
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ADVAN Sport V105
Pros
- Outstanding grip and traction in both dry and wet road conditions
- Sharp, responsive steering feel and high cornering stability
- Competitive pricing offering great value relative to flagship alternatives
Cons
- Faster-than-expected tread wear, particularly under spirited or track driving
- Noticeable road noise on certain vehicles or rough road surfaces
- Subpar performance and lack of confidence in snow and freezing temperatures
Tire B Potenza S001 RFT
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Precise steering feedback and handling responsiveness
- Strong dry-road grip
Cons
- Poor wet-weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
- High levels of road noise and cabin vibration
- Harsh, stiff ride quality over road imperfections
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 | B · Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 144 | 14 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 23″ | 17″ – 21″ |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 240 A A | 280 A A |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT
Winner: Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 — better handling, snow and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 scores 71 vs 51 on handling.
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 scores 60 vs 42 on snow.
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 scores 73 vs 57 on dry.
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 scores 68 vs 54 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.