Tests 70 · 4 tests Owners 68 · 494 reviews
Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
ADVAN Sport V105 leads, 69–66 Narrow edge
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 70 · 4 tests Owners 68 · 494 reviews
Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Tests 74 · 4 tests Owners 59 · 2,183 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))
“Suggestiona on tyres Hi everyone, Just wanted to ask if you guys ever had Yokohama Advan Fleva V701. My FK2 has nearly 400bhp and I’m not using it daily anymore as I want it to preserve the baby. My drive is a bit aggressive occasionally but nothing crazy or track day as I don’t have the time. I would like to know if you guys ever had this specific type of tyre. What you think about? They’re actually good? I wouldn’t like to buy again the Michelin pilot sport 4s which I found absolutely rubbish. I found those yoko for the decent price of 98£ each. So I buy it or should I move to Pirelli PZero pZ4 sport ?”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | ADVAN Sport V105 | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 73 | 79 |
| Reviews found online | 75 | 70 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 91% | 97% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 98% | 98% |
| Source | ADVAN Sport V105 | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 72 | 71 |
| Reviews found online | 71 | 64 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 92% | 86% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 98% | 97% |
| Source | ADVAN Sport V105 | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 55 | 14 |
| Source | ADVAN Sport V105 | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 61 |
| Reviews found online | 67 | 64 |
| Source | ADVAN Sport V105 | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 51 | 76 |
| Reviews found online | 66 | 62 |
| Source | ADVAN Sport V105 | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 70 | 75 |
| Reviews found online | 63 | 61 |
| Source | ADVAN Sport V105 | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 72 | 71 |
| Category | Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 | Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 66 |
| Dry | 74 | 75 |
| Wet | 71 | 68 |
| Snow | 61 | 37 |
| Comfort | 68 | 62 |
| Noise | 57 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 69 |
| Handling | 72 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ADVAN Sport V105
ADVAN Fleva V701
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | ADVAN Sport V105 | ADVAN Fleva V701 | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 91% #20/49 · 2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test | 97% #6/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | −6.2 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 98% #5/10 · 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test | 98% #14/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | −0.3 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 85% #10/10 · 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test | 82% #7/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +2.1 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 97% #9/10 · 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test | 100% #2/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | −2.5 | Different tests |
| Price | Other | 57% #6/10 · 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test | 71% #17/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | −14.0 | Different tests |
| Tested Tread Life (Miles) | Other | 62% #6/22 · 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires | 85% #2/22 · 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires | −23.1 | Same test |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 14% #7/11 · 2015 Auto Express Tyre Test | 6% #16/45 · 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout | +8.0 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 95% #9/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test | 92% #15/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +2.7 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 92% #16/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test | 86% #18/20 · 2017 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +6.0 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 98% #11/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test | 97% #19/20 · 2017 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +0.8 | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Community opinion on the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 is generally very positive, with users frequently considering them as affordable, high-performing summer tires ideal for daily driving, spirited backroad runs, and wet conditions. Many drivers compare them favorably or as cost-effective alternatives to premium options like Michelin Pilot Sports, though questions occasionally arise regarding their exact lifespan and wear compared to all-season alternatives.
“Yokohama advan fleva v701? Currently looking at stock sizes for my 99 MRS and the v701s are the only decent set I can find. I live in Canada and I was planning on ordering them for next week, and just thought to do one more validation check before driving out to Bellingham. Pretty new to picking out my own tires, trying to also stay within 550-600usd or maxish 800-850cad including tax if possible.”
“Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 in 2026 Do they make sense today? I’d put them on a hatchback (1300kg) and I usually drive up to 180-200 km/h with quick accelerations and curves in my daily. Weather is usually sunny, but sometimes it rains. Are them still a safe and a good choice, or are there some other brands that should result better for my driving style (and for my 215/45 r18 rims)? Thanks in advance.”
Based on 20 community posts
| Attribute | A · Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 | B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 13 | 37 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 240 A A | 300 A A |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 51 psi |
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Winner: Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 — better snow, comfort and wet. Pick the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 if noise matters most to you.
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 scores 61 vs 37 on snow.
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 70 vs 57 on noise.
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 scores 68 vs 62 on comfort.
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 scores 71 vs 68 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.