Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 0 road tests and 1,627 + 79 owner reviews. How we score
Geolandar A/T G015 is ahead, 74–65
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 73 · 2 tests Owners 77 · 1,627 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2018 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test (noise)
“I put the G015 ’s on y wife’s 2020 this spring but in 225/65r17. Saved the stock wheels for snow tires . No complaints with the tires . They are super quiet. Handle fine.”
Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 79 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Geolandar A/T G015 | ContiProContact |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 74 | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 77 | 67 |
Geolandar A/T G015: 60% × 73.6 + 40% × 77.1 = 75
ContiProContact: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 67
No road tests of dry for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
| Source | Geolandar A/T G015 | ContiProContact |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 69 | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 80 | 63 |
Geolandar A/T G015: 60% × 68.9 + 40% × 79.7 = 73
ContiProContact: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 63.2 = 65
No road tests of wet for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Geolandar A/T G015 | ContiProContact |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 77 | ≈ 65 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 73 | 56 |
Geolandar A/T G015: 60% × 76.6 + 40% × 73.4 = 75
ContiProContact: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 56.3 = 62
No road tests of snow for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
| Source | Geolandar A/T G015 | ContiProContact |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 71 (est.) | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 77 | 59 |
Geolandar A/T G015: 40% × 70.7 (est.) + 60% × 77.4 = 75
ContiProContact: 40% × 67.3 (est.) + 60% × 59 = 62
No road tests of comfort for Geolandar A/T G015 or ContiProContact. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Geolandar A/T G015 | ContiProContact |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 76 | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 78 | 70 |
Geolandar A/T G015: 60% × 75.8 + 40% × 77.9 = 77
ContiProContact: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 70.3 = 68
No road tests of noise for ContiProContact. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Geolandar A/T G015 | ContiProContact |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 70 (est.) | ≈ 64 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 76 | 60 |
Geolandar A/T G015: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 75.9 = 72
ContiProContact: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 59.5 = 62
No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar A/T G015. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
| Source | Geolandar A/T G015 | ContiProContact |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 74 | 63 |
| Source | Geolandar A/T G015 | ContiProContact |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 57 | – |
| Category | Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 | Continental ContiProContact |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 74 | 65 |
| Dry | 75 | 67 |
| Wet | 73 | 65 |
| Snow | 75 | 62 |
| Comfort | 75 | 62 |
| Noise | 77 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 72 | 62 |
| Handling (owners) | 74 | 63 |
| Efficiency | 57 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Geolandar A/T G015
ContiProContact
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community sentiment toward the Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 is predominantly positive, with owners highlighting its quiet highway manners, strong snow and wet traction, and good light off-road capability. Criticisms primarily center around a slight 1–2 mpg fuel economy loss, potential ride harshness or softer P-rated sidewalls depending on vehicle application, and gravel retention in the tread. Many drivers consider it a balanced all-terrain tire suited for predominantly on-road daily driving with occasional trail use.
“I just put the G015 's on 2018 Outback . The harsh ride hurts my wife's back. I will trade them in for something that is mostly for a smooth ride. It's funny, I put the LT version on my Expedition and it's great. I suppose the shock valving is way different between the 2 vehicles. I just hope Yokohama 's 30 day trial is for real.”
“Changing tires (General Grabber AT3 vs Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015) Halloo I am about to pick my RR next month from the dealer and I am thinking if it is a good idea to change tires. Here is the context: I am buying the RR because I always wanted to drive a truck and I love American cars in general (I also have Mustang s197 V8). In fact I want to switch from Wrangler Sahara, which is a great car BTW, however after 4 years and only 20.000 miles I know I miss more comfort. The rest of my family even more ;-) 95% of my trips is on reagular roads, city cruising. Sometimes some rural paths (no heavy offroading). My Wrangler came with Duelers, which I replaced with Yokohama A/T G015. The difference was night and day as far as wet and cold. Here in POLAND we have two seasons: it is either hot and wet or cold and wet. Winter in my area is pretty light, however I go to the mountains once a year. So the question is: As I do not know how General Grabber AT3 works, but I trust Yokohoma G015, is the change the tires worth it?”
“Upped the pressure to 43 PSI for a 1000 mile drive, still suffering about a 1-2mpg penalty but that could also have been due to the higher speeds (west TX speed limit of 80 mph). Got 'em off road on the rocks and they're obviously loads better than the stock SR-As out there. We'll see how they handle mud soon enough. Have 5K miles on these things so far and am satisfied. I'm not super happy per se but I'm satisfied. Jury's still out on whether I'd buy again. Will report back in another few thousand miles.”
Based on 30 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 | B · Continental ContiProContact |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All-Season tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 90 | 56 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | 15″ – 19″ |
| Tread depth | 11 - 18/32″ | 9 - 12/32″ |
| UTQG | 360 - 600 A B | 400 - 540 A - AA A |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | 35 - 80 psi | 44 - 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 6 | 6 |
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015
Continental ContiProContact
Winner: Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 — better snow, comfort and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 scores 75 vs 62 on snow.
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 scores 75 vs 62 on comfort.
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 scores 74 vs 63 on handling.
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 scores 72 vs 62 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015, 73 vs 65 on our wet score.
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015, 75 vs 67 on our dry score.
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015, 75 vs 62 on our snow score.
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015, 77 vs 68 on our noise score.
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015, 75 vs 62 on our comfort score.
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015, 72 vs 62 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology
