Head-to-head Updated

BFGoodrich g-Grip All Season 2 vs Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 6 + 19 road tests and 56 + 1,272 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: g-Grip All Season 2 68, EUROALL SEASON AS210 69.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

BFGoodrich g-Grip All Season 2

g-Grip All Season 2

All Season

± 6

Tests 71 · 6 tests Owners 64 · 56 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 14 in 2020 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test (snow braking)

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
Tire BFalken

EUROALL SEASON AS210

All Season

± 5

Tests 71 · 19 tests Owners 68 · 1,272 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 (snow braking)

“All Season tyre vs Summer tyre with better wet grip? I’ve always just assumed that All Season tyres are going to be better for driving in wet conditions than the equivalent summer tyre, but now I’m confused. See these Falken tyres for example: Falken Sincera SN 110 - EU Wet Grip class A. Falken Euroall Season AS210 - EU Wet Grip class B-C The summer tyres are also cheaper & have better fuel economy according to the EU labels. What would be the advantage of all season tyres in these scenarios? Or am I missing something really obvious regarding how the EU ratings work? Read more”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

Key facts

  • In 5 tests that measured dry braking for both, g-Grip All Season 2 won 1 and EUROALL SEASON AS210 won 4 (average 91% vs 91% of the best).
  • In 5 tests that measured wet braking for both, g-Grip All Season 2 won 3 and EUROALL SEASON AS210 won 2 (average 88% vs 90% of the best).
  1. 58

    Dry

    EUROALL SEASON AS210 +7
    65
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Grip All Season 2EUROALL SEASON AS210
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 19 tests6166
    Reviews found online5464
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 1–491%91%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–297%99%

    g-Grip All Season 2: 60% × 60.7 + 40% × 54.1 = 58

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 66.4 + 40% × 64 = 65

  2. 67

    Wet

    EUROALL SEASON AS210 +10
    77
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Grip All Season 2EUROALL SEASON AS210
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 19 tests7082
    Reviews found online6270
    Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–293%95%
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 3–288%90%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–196%96%

    g-Grip All Season 2: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 62.4 = 67

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 81.6 + 40% × 70.4 = 77

  3. 81

    Snow

    g-Grip All Season 2 +16
    65
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Grip All Season 2EUROALL SEASON AS210
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 15 tests8764
    Reviews found online7266
    Snow Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–0100%87%
    Snow Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–0100%98%

    g-Grip All Season 2: 60% × 87.4 + 40% × 72.3 = 81

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 64.2 + 40% × 66.3 = 65

  4. 67

    Comfort

    Level
    67
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Grip All Season 2EUROALL SEASON AS210
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 68 (est.)78
    Reviews found online6661

    g-Grip All Season 2: 40% × 68 (est.) + 60% × 65.5 = 67

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 40% × 77.5 + 60% × 60.7 = 67

    No road tests of comfort for g-Grip All Season 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 70

    Noise

    g-Grip All Season 2 +22
    48
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Grip All Season 2EUROALL SEASON AS210
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 15 tests7236
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Noise (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–0100%97%

    g-Grip All Season 2: 60% × 72.3 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 70

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 35.8 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 48

    No owner ratings of noise for g-Grip All Season 2 or EUROALL SEASON AS210. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 73

    Treadwear

    EUROALL SEASON AS210 +2
    75
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Grip All Season 2EUROALL SEASON AS210
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 5 tests7477
    Reviews found online7172
    Wear (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–176%90%

    g-Grip All Season 2: 60% × 74.2 + 40% × 70.5 = 73

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 76.7 + 40% × 72.1 = 75

  7. 61

    Handling (owners)

    EUROALL SEASON AS210 +5
    66
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Grip All Season 2EUROALL SEASON AS210
    Reviews found online6166
  8. 73

    Efficiency

    g-Grip All Season 2 +53
    20
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Grip All Season 2EUROALL SEASON AS210
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 15 tests7320
    Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–093%87%
Scores at a glance
BFGoodrich g-Grip All Season 2 vs Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBFGoodrich g-Grip All Season 2Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
Relative Score 68 69
Dry 58 65
Wet 67 77
Snow 81 65
Comfort 67 67
Noise 70 48
Treadwear 73 75
Handling (owners) 61 66
Efficiency 73 20

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

g-Grip All Season 2

± 5

EUROALL SEASON AS210

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 6 tests that ran both, BFGoodrich g-Grip All Season 2 finished ahead 1 times and Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 5 times.

DisciplineCategoryg-Grip All Season 2EUROALL SEASON AS210ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 91% 91% −0.7 1–4 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2021 All Season Tyre Market Overview · 225/50 R17
Dry Handling Dry 97% 99% −1.1 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2020 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 93% 95% −2.2 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2020 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Wet Braking Wet 88% 90% −2.3 3–2 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2021 All Season Tyre Market Overview · 225/50 R17
Wet Handling Wet 96% 96% −0.1 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2020 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Snow Braking Snow 100% 87% +12.6 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2020 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Snow Handling Snow 100% 98% +2.3 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2020 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Noise Noise 100% 97% +2.7 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2020 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Wear Treadwear 76% 90% −14.1 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 93% 87% +5.7 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2020 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Total Cost of Ownership Cost #10/14 #8/14 – 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Value Cost 68% 99% −30.3 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Overall Ranking Overall #18/32 #5/32 – 1–5 in 6 shared tests Newest: 2021 All Season Tyre Market Overview · 225/50 R17

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A g-Grip All Season 2

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
  • Great value for the price point
  • Strong wet and winter weather traction

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls leading to a mushy or less responsive cornering feel
  • Odd initial steering response that requires getting used to
  • Can struggle with high-horsepower rear-wheel-drive applications
All owner themes in the g-Grip All Season 2 review

Tire B EUROALL SEASON AS210

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and confidence in wet, slushy, and snowy winter conditions
  • High value for money compared to premium competitor brands
  • Impressive braking response and aquaplaning resistance in heavy rain

Cons

  • Higher than average road noise and tire roar reported by some users
  • Negative impact on fuel economy and rolling resistance
  • Vague or spongy steering response and handling when driven hard in warm, dry weather
All owner themes in the EUROALL SEASON AS210 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

BFGoodrich g-Grip All Season 2

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210

Neutral

Community discussions regarding the Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 predominantly consist of product listings and prospective buyers evaluating it as a budget-friendly all-season option. Users frequently compare its EU label ratings for wet grip and fuel economy against summer tires and premium all-season competitors like Michelin CrossClimate 2 and Goodyear Vector 4Seasons.

Top themes
#budget tire comparison#all-season vs summer#EU label wet grip#fuel economy ratings#winter driving alternatives

Based on 10 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich g-Grip All Season 2 B · Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available4892
Rim diameters14″ – 19″13″ – 20″
Sizes in common4646

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich g-Grip All Season 2

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210

Too close to call: BFGoodrich g-Grip All Season 2 and Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 are within 2 points overall. BFGoodrich g-Grip All Season 2 is stronger on efficiency, noise and snow. Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 is stronger on wet and dry.

Pick tire A You want lower fuel or energy use

BFGoodrich g-Grip All Season 2 scores 73 vs 20 on efficiency.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

BFGoodrich g-Grip All Season 2 scores 70 vs 48 on noise.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

BFGoodrich g-Grip All Season 2 scores 81 vs 65 on snow.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 scores 77 vs 67 on wet.

Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Grip All Season 2
Tire B · Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

g-Grip All Season 2 or EUROALL SEASON AS210?

Which is better in the wet, g-Grip All Season 2 or EUROALL SEASON AS210?

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210, 77 vs 67 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, g-Grip All Season 2 or EUROALL SEASON AS210?

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210, 65 vs 58 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, g-Grip All Season 2 or EUROALL SEASON AS210?

BFGoodrich g-Grip All Season 2, 81 vs 65 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, g-Grip All Season 2 or EUROALL SEASON AS210?

BFGoodrich g-Grip All Season 2, 70 vs 48 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, g-Grip All Season 2 or EUROALL SEASON AS210?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 67 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, g-Grip All Season 2 or EUROALL SEASON AS210?

Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 75 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

Which rolls more easily, g-Grip All Season 2 or EUROALL SEASON AS210?

BFGoodrich g-Grip All Season 2, 73 vs 20 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology