Head-to-head Updated

BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A vs Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 4 road tests and 102 + 2,579 owner reviews. How we score

CrossClimate 2 SUV is ahead, 83–69

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
Tire BMichelin

CrossClimate 2 SUV

All Season

± 5

Tests 87 · 4 tests Owners 82 · 2,579 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2023 SUV All Season Tyre Test (dry braking)

“I have the Michelin Cross Climate 2 SUV tyres . The many reviews I read approved of their performance in snowy conditions (if that is an issue where you live) and also their dry condition performance. They supposedly have a decent life span. They felt nicer to drive on than the Primacy tyres . They weren't cheap at about £170 each fitted but will give me some insurance about snowy conditions and will hopefully last until I swap the car in about 3 years.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 71

    Dry

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +16
    87
    Why this score
    SourceTrail-Terrain T/ACrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests≈ 70 (est.)86
    Reviews found online7388

    Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.5 = 71

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 85.9 + 40% × 88.1 = 87

    No road tests of dry for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 65

    Wet

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +19
    84
    Why this score
    SourceTrail-Terrain T/ACrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests≈ 66 (est.)84
    Reviews found online6385

    Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 62.6 = 65

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 83.9 + 40% × 84.7 = 84

    No road tests of wet for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 77

    Snow

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +13
    90
    Why this score
    SourceTrail-Terrain T/ACrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests≈ 74 (est.)97
    Reviews found online8280

    Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 74.2 (est.) + 40% × 82.2 = 77

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 97.4 + 40% × 80.1 = 90

    No road tests of snow for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 65

    Comfort

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +20
    85
    Why this score
    SourceTrail-Terrain T/ACrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 68 (est.)81
    Reviews found online6488

    Trail-Terrain T/A: 40% × 67.6 (est.) + 60% × 63.5 = 65

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 40% × 81.3 + 60% × 87.6 = 85

    No road tests of comfort for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 67

    Noise

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +9
    76
    Why this score
    SourceTrail-Terrain T/ACrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests≈ 66 (est.)82
    Reviews found online69≈ 66 (est.)

    Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 69 = 67

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 82.1 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 76

    No road tests of noise for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

    No owner ratings of noise for CrossClimate 2 SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 72

    Treadwear

    Trail-Terrain T/A +2
    70
    Why this score
    SourceTrail-Terrain T/ACrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7573

    Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 72

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.7 = 70

    No road tests of treadwear for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for CrossClimate 2 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 64

    Handling (owners)

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +25
    89
    Why this score
    SourceTrail-Terrain T/ACrossClimate 2 SUV
    Reviews found online6489
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    87
    Why this score
    SourceTrail-Terrain T/ACrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests–87
Scores at a glance
BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A vs Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/AMichelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
Relative Score 69 83
Dry 71 87
Wet 65 84
Snow 77 90
Comfort 65 85
Noise 67 76
Treadwear 72 70
Handling (owners) 64 89
Efficiency – 87

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Trail-Terrain T/A

± 5

CrossClimate 2 SUV

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryTrail-Terrain T/ACrossClimate 2 SUVΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 93% #8/8 · 2025 ADAC All Terrain Tyre Test 100% #1/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 – Different tests
Curved Aquaplaning Wet 65% #8/8 · 2025 ADAC All Terrain Tyre Test 87% #3/9 · 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 88% #7/8 · 2025 ADAC All Terrain Tyre Test 100% #1/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 81% #8/8 · 2025 ADAC All Terrain Tyre Test 99% #3/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 – Different tests
Wet Circle Wet 93% #8/8 · 2025 ADAC All Terrain Tyre Test 97% #6/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 – Different tests
Snow Braking Snow 100% #1/8 · 2025 ADAC All Terrain Tyre Test 100% #1/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 – Different tests
Snow Traction Snow 100% #1/8 · 2025 ADAC All Terrain Tyre Test 100% #1/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #8/8 2025 ADAC All Terrain Tyre Test #1/7 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Trail-Terrain T/A

Pros

  • Low road noise for an all-terrain tire, with several reviewers calling it quieter than previous tires such as the AT3 and other all-terrains
  • Strong snow and ice performance, including a Colorado snowstorm and multiple Alps trips with up to a foot of snow
  • Comfortable, smooth ride and good handling and braking on the road

Cons

  • Poor wet-weather traction reported by several reviewers, including wheelspin, lack of confidence on wet roads and ABS activation issues
  • Some reviewers found road noise high on paved surfaces, and one called it outrageously noisy, though others found it quiet
  • Wear is faster for some owners, with one set nearing replacement after about 20,000 miles and two years
All owner themes in the Trail-Terrain T/A review

Tire B CrossClimate 2 SUV

Pros

  • Exceptional wet, ice, and snow traction that inspires winter-weather driving confidence
  • Significantly improved ride comfort and impact absorption over road imperfections
  • Impressive tread life and durability yielding long-term value

Cons

  • Higher initial purchase price compared to competitors
  • Minor fuel economy or range drop reported by some users, especially on hybrids and EVs
  • Occasional low-pitched or increased road noise at highway speeds (between 50-70 MPH)
All owner themes in the CrossClimate 2 SUV review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

Positive

Community members generally view the Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV as a premium, dependable tire known for strong snow and dry performance, comfortable driving feel, and valuable 3PMS certification. Discussions frequently center around sizing availability, comparison to other models like the Primacy or standard CrossClimate 2, and choosing between specific speed or OEM ratings.

mbworld.org

“So here's the latest on Tires recommendations: (still dithering). Looking for smooth, soft ride, good mileage. I do have a mountain home; use ~30ish days during winter ski season, but mostly highway driving in Southern California ( don't disparage me for being a Californian. I cant stand the people or the government too lol. But it's a beautiful state). 2020 300GLC 4MATIC California car, 235/60 18H rating What will it be...?????? MICHELIN DEFENDER LTX M/S - seems like you guys are in favor. But hard to get. And the size is a 235/60 106T designation. Is the T speed max of 116mph not safe enough when OEM was an H rating 130mph? MICHELIN DEFENDER2. $238. Tire rack MICHELIN CrossClimate2 SUV tire rack $248. - hearing both good and bad. I heard they're soft and mileage tanks. Check out reviews on the Michelin USA official site. Pretty interesting. CONTINENTAL CROSSCONTACT LX25 $222. tire rack high rating? Also just got this from TireRack customer service CONTINENTAL EXTREMECONTACT DWS 06 PLUS. $238. Not sure, seems like TR is trying to promote them for Cont.”

r/CarTalkUK ·2 upvotes ·2024-11-07

“Opinions please ... Michelin Primacy 4+ vs Michelin Cross Climate 2 SUV? Hi all ... I'm coming up to tyre replacement time so I've looking at what's around. Currently on Bridgestone Turanzas cos that's what came with the car, but I'm not hugely impressed with their lifespan, they seem to pick up sidewall damage easily and the tread seems to age quickly. Which is not much cop when all i do is commute round Southern England. I've pretty much settled on Michelin Primacy 4+ or Cross Climate 2 SUV but I'm having difficulty making a final decision. So I thought the hivemind might settle this: in your experience which one is best for lifespan and fuel consumption? Car is a 2018 SEAT Ateca with 18" alloys. Edit: well guys, I went with the Cross Climates, thanks for the advice!”

r/tires ·1 upvote ·2025-11-12

“I just bought Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV for my Range Rover Sport and the reason is that I needed/wanted 3PMS certification. Also in my driving career I’ve always found Michelin better for everyday use compared to Pirelli which I instead preferred for performance and weekend fun.”

Top themes
#snow and dry performance#speed and OEM ratings#tire size availability#comfort and driving feel#comparison with Primacy#SUV versus standard version

Based on 8 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A B · Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available5035
Rim diameters15″ – 22″17″ – 22″
Tread depth11 - 13/32″—
UTQG660 A A - B—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering—
Max pressure44 - 51 psi—
Sizes in common1010

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

Winner: Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV — better handling, comfort and wet. Where the BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 89 vs 64 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 85 vs 65 on comfort.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 84 vs 65 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 87 vs 71 on dry.

Tire A · BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A
Tire B · Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Trail-Terrain T/A or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Which is better in the wet, Trail-Terrain T/A or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 84 vs 65 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Trail-Terrain T/A or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 87 vs 71 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Trail-Terrain T/A or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 90 vs 77 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Trail-Terrain T/A or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 76 vs 67 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Trail-Terrain T/A or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 85 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Trail-Terrain T/A or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 70 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology