Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 115 reviews
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 115 + 559 owner reviews. How we score
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV is ahead, 75–67
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 74 · 1 test Owners 78 · 559 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test (noise)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
67
Dry
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV +976Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 74 Reviews found online 66 78 Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 66.2 = 67
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV: 60% × 74.4 + 40% × 78.4 = 76
No road tests of dry for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
71
Wet
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV +576Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 71 (est.) 74 Reviews found online 71 79 Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV: 60% × 70.9 (est.) + 40% × 71 = 71
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV: 60% × 74.1 + 40% × 79.3 = 76
No road tests of wet for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
65
Comfort
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV +671Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 62 72 Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV: 40% × 67.9 (est.) + 60% × 62.4 = 65
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV: 40% × 69.7 (est.) + 60% × 72.2 = 71
No road tests of comfort for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison72Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 76 Reviews found online – ≈ 67 (est.) Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV: 60% × 76.1 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 72
No owner ratings of noise for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
60
Treadwear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV +1373Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 56 77 Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV: 60% × 62.7 (est.) + 40% × 56.2 = 60
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 77.1 = 73
No road tests of treadwear for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
66
Handling (owners)
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV +1076Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV Reviews found online 66 76 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison63Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 63
Scores at a glance
| Category | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 75 |
| Dry | 67 | 76 |
| Wet | 71 | 76 |
| Comfort | 65 | 71 |
| Noise | – | 72 |
| Treadwear | 60 | 73 |
| Handling (owners) | 66 | 76 |
| Efficiency | – | 63 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #6/7 2016 Autobild 4x4 / SUV Tyre Test | #4/9 2020 Auto Bild Allrad SUV Summer Tire Test R18 | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry traction with strong confidence during heavy rain
- Quiet and smooth ride quality with minimal road noise
- Precise steering response with no tramlining on uneven surfaces
Cons
- High initial cost mentioned by some users
- Potentially faster tread wear depending on driving habits
- Slightly noisy initially until the tires are properly worn in
Tire B Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV
Pros
- Exceptional grip and confidence-inspiring performance in both wet and dry conditions
- Noticeably lower road noise and a smoother, more comfortable ride compared to competitors
- Improved steering response and precise handling capabilities
Cons
- Poor performance and lack of traction in snow and wintry conditions
- Increased rolling resistance leading to a slight drop in fuel economy or EV efficiency for some users
- Susceptibility to varying road surface textures, which can occasionally alter cabin noise levels
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV | B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 7 | 44 |
| Rim diameters | 19″ – 21″ | 17″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 9 - 10/32″ | 8 - 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 240 A - AA A | 240 - 300 A - AA A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 50,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Raised Black Lettering | Black Side Wall - Raised Black Lettering |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | 50 - 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 6 | 6 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV
Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV — better treadwear, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV scores 73 vs 60 on treadwear.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV scores 76 vs 66 on handling.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV scores 76 vs 67 on dry.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV scores 71 vs 65 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV?
Which is better in the wet, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV, 76 vs 71 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV, 76 vs 67 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV, 71 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV, 73 vs 60 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology