Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 vs Kumho Ecsta PS91 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Ecsta Sport PS72 is ahead, 79–62

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire AKumho

Ecsta Sport PS72

Summer

Tests 77 · 8 tests Owners 80 · 1,031 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 4 in 2026 AutoView Value Sport Tyre Test (noise)

“Anyone else running these tires? Is it possible the tire(s) out of round? New hypergram wheels/new tires w/ aluminum hubcentric rings. Has vibrations, but most noticed front right. Balanced again same thing. Took the hub rings off with significant decrease but still there. Will try again with plastic rings followed by swapping wheels front to rear. If still going on will have to live with it”

Tire BKumho

Ecsta PS91

Summer

Tests 76 · 6 tests Owners 47 · 485 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 11 in 2023 Sport Auto UHP Tyre Test (noise)

“Follow up on new wheels/tires for ZHP Well new wheels and tires are on aswell as aligned. I love the tire and fitment setup but really do not like the gunmetal grey color especially on imola. I will feel it out for a while but probably eventually powder coat to OEM silver. Wheels specs are 18 x 8.5 x ET50 with 255/35/18 Kuhmo Ecsta PS91 all around. -2.5 camber in the front and -2.8 in the rear.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 84

    Dry

    Ecsta Sport PS72 +16
    68
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta Sport PS72Ecsta PS91
    Professional tests (TWG score)8576
    Reviews found online8357
    Dry Braking (% of best)92%95%
    Dry Handling (% of best)98%97%
  2. 85

    Wet

    Ecsta Sport PS72 +16
    69
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta Sport PS72Ecsta PS91
    Professional tests (TWG score)8777
    Reviews found online8355
    Wet Braking (% of best)93%92%
    Wet Circle (% of best)98%70%
    Wet Handling (% of best)99%96%
  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    38
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta Sport PS72Ecsta PS91
    Reviews found online–17
  4. 65

    Comfort

    Ecsta Sport PS72 +4
    61
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta Sport PS72Ecsta PS91
    Professional tests (TWG score)59–
    Reviews found online7553
  5. 64

    Noise

    Ecsta PS91 +2
    66
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta Sport PS72Ecsta PS91
    Professional tests (TWG score)6275
    Reviews found online–54
  6. 72

    Treadwear

    Ecsta Sport PS72 +23
    49
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta Sport PS72Ecsta PS91
    Professional tests (TWG score)70–
    Reviews found online7437
  7. 83

    Handling

    Ecsta Sport PS72 +26
    57
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta Sport PS72Ecsta PS91
    Reviews found online8357
Scores at a glance
Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 vs Kumho Ecsta PS91: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Ecsta Sport PS72Kumho Ecsta PS91
Relative Score 79 62
Dry 84 68
Wet 85 69
Snow – 38
Comfort 65 61
Noise 64 66
Treadwear 72 49
Handling 83 57

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Ecsta Sport PS72

Ecsta PS91

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.

DisciplineCategoryEcsta Sport PS72Ecsta PS91ΔBoth?
Dry Braking Dry 92% #8/9 · 2025 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test 95% #7/10 · 2023 AZ UHP Summer Tyre Test −2.2 Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 98% #3/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test 97% #9/10 · 2017 Sport Auto UHP and Track Day Test +1.1 Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 95% #2/9 · 2025 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test 75% #8/11 · 2023 Sport Auto UHP Tyre Test +20.1 Different tests
Noise Other 100% #1/4 · 2026 AutoView Value Sport Tyre Test 100% #1/11 · 2023 Sport Auto UHP Tyre Test 0.0 Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall 14% #7/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test 20% #9/10 · 2023 AUTO Straßenverkehr 2023 Summer Tire Test R18 −5.7 Different tests
Straight Aqua Straight 95% #8/9 · 2025 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test 96% #4/10 · 2023 AZ UHP Summer Tyre Test −0.8 Different tests
Subj. Dry Handling Subj 85% #5/7 · 2026 AutoView Sport Tyre Test 70% #8/10 · 2023 AUTO Straßenverkehr 2023 Summer Tire Test R18 +15.3 Different tests
Subj. Wet Handling Subj 100% #2/8 · 2025 Die Reifentester UHP Summer Tyre Test 78% #6/10 · 2023 AUTO Straßenverkehr 2023 Summer Tire Test R18 +22.2 Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 93% #4/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test 92% #4/9 · 2017 Auto Bild Sports Cars Tyre Test +1.0 Different tests
Wet Circle Wet 98% #8/9 · 2025 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test 70% #4/10 · 2023 AUTO Straßenverkehr 2023 Summer Tire Test R18 +27.9 Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 99% #4/9 · 2025 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test 96% #5/10 · 2017 Sport Auto UHP and Track Day Test +3.0 Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ecsta Sport PS72

Pros

  • Excellent wet and dry grip with short braking distances
  • High value for money compared to Tier-1 premium brands
  • Stable, predictable handling and confident cornering

Cons

  • Reported instances of out-of-round tires causing high-speed steering vibrations
  • Occasional complaints about increased road noise on certain rough surfaces
  • Rapid tread wear reported by some users during aggressive, spirited driving
All owner themes in the Ecsta Sport PS72 review

Tire B Ecsta PS91

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet grip providing high confidence during spirited driving
  • Significantly more affordable than premium flagship alternatives while offering comparable performance
  • Stiff sidewalls enhance steering response, cornering stability, and feedback

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear and shorter lifespan, particularly with aggressive driving or on heavier vehicles
  • Stiff sidewalls result in a firmer, less comfortable ride that transmits road imperfections
  • Tendency to tramline or follow road grooves on straight highways
All owner themes in the Ecsta PS91 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72

Positive

Community sentiment toward the Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 is largely positive, with drivers praising its impressive dry and wet grip, responsive handling, and low cabin noise compared to premium alternatives like the Michelin Pilot Sport series. Most owners view it as an outstanding value proposition, offering near-flagship performance at a significantly lower price point. Minor criticisms focus on potential treadwear longevity, lack of rim protection, mixed feedback on highway noise, and occasional wheel balance or vibration issues.

r/elektrischrijden ·1 upvote ·2026-09-02

“Ik heb nog een paar nieuwe banden liggen voor die maat. Continental PremiumContact 7. Had je voor heel weinig mogen hebben. Die zijn echt wel beter dan die Hankooks. Overigens hoeft een goede band niet heel duur te zijn. Ik was zelf niet tevreden mer Hankook. De laatste nieuwe banden die ik heb laten monteren waren Kumho's Ecsta sport PS72. Die zijn weliswaar goedkoop, maar komen uitstekend uit veel testen. Ze hebben ook echt meer grip dan de Hankooks en Vredesteins die ik hiervoor had.”

r/ElantraN ·4 upvotes ·2026-01-11

“Kumho Ecsta Sport S (PS72) vs PS4S (HN spec) If you are looking to switch to Ecsta Sport S from OE PS4S, go for it! Just switched to them based on Tirerack review. Can confirm they are indeed better at small bump absorption and tire noise (upto 2-3db). Steering feel is more natural and softer than OE PS4S. Can't comment on wear yet. Would still recommend the OE PS4S if your driving is mainly on track/canyons. PS72s are much better if your driving has more commute. The OEM PS4S lasted me ~28k miles. Read more”

r/TyreReviews ·73 upvotes ·2026-04-04

“New summer tires A while ago, I made a post during my search for a new set of summer tires. In the end, I chose the Kumho PS72 Ecsta Sport S. My previous tires included the Michelin PS4S, Bridgestone Turanza T005, Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 3, and Toyo Proxes Sport 2. With the Michelins being my favorite in terms of driving feel. By now, I’ve driven around 1,000 km on the Kumhos, and I’m pleasantly surprised. They offer excellent grip on dry roads and in corners, and they still perform well in wet conditions. My car has over 300 hp and AWD, so grip is definitely important. I can highly recommend these tires, especially considering the price. In terms of feel and performance, they don’t seem to fall short of the Michelin PS4S I had before, yet they cost me about half as much.”

Top themes
#value for money#dry and wet grip#low road noise#Michelin PS4 comparison#balancing and vibration#ride comfort compliance#treadwear longevity

Based on 33 community posts

Tire B

Kumho Ecsta PS91

Mixed

The Kumho Ecsta PS91 is widely praised as an affordable, budget-friendly summer tire with attractive styling and respectable wet or daily street performance compared to pricier rivals like Michelin. However, several users express frustration with poor tread life, rapid wear, and insufficient grip or heat endurance under hard driving and track conditions. Others also note issues with sketchy handling, flat-spotting, or vibration when cold.

r/CarTrackDays ·1 upvote ·2026-07-20

“Pretty terrible idea, the PS91 will not have the same heat capacity as the V730, so your front/rear grip balance will change wildly during a session. With the non-200s on the front, at least you’ll understeer instead of oversteer/spin, but not ideal. An experienced driver might be able to work around this, if you’re new, this would be a dangerous situation. Similarly, I wouldn’t mix something like a yokohama AO52, which delivers all of its grip from cold and tends to overheat within a couple laps, with something like a hankook RS4, which famously takes some time to warm up and then delivers consistent grip for a long time”

s197forum.com ·2017-03-29

“I've only got a couple thousand on them and just spirited driving in the mountains. I think they will easily go over 10k even with a few track events. I am thinking about getting a set for my SVT focus as I autoX with that car, much easier to drive at the limit than a turbocharged S197.”

rennlist.com

“my turbo came with a set of Kumho Ecsta PS91 in the OEM widebody sizes that were around a year old and had maybe lost 15% wear. coming from someone who loves PS4S, i hated them. grip was subpar. it felt wasteful to toss them though since they were relatively new and had decent tread left so i toughed them out. i got maybe 2k miles out of the rears before they needed replacement just from normal street / occasional spirited driving. they are not a great handling tire and they are quite bad from a wear perspective as well. just buy michelin or even continental and don't look back.”

Top themes
#budget performance value#rapid tread wear#wet and dry traction#track and heat limitations#ride quality and appearance#Michelin alternative comparison

Based on 45 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 B · Kumho Ecsta PS91
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available501
Rim diameters17″ – 21″19″
Tread depth9.4/32″9.5/32″
UTQG320 A A260 A A
Treadwear warranty30,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure50 psi50 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72

Kumho Ecsta PS91

Winner: Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 — better handling, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 scores 83 vs 57 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 scores 72 vs 49 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 scores 84 vs 68 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 scores 85 vs 69 on wet.

Tire A · Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta PS91

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

79

Leads

Ecsta Sport PS72

Amazon