Head-to-head Updated

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV vs Vredestein Quatrac — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 4 + 18 road tests and 2,588 + 1,596 owner reviews. How we score

CrossClimate 2 SUV leads, 83–80 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
Tire AMichelin

CrossClimate 2 SUV

All Season

± 5

Tests 87 · 4 tests Owners 83 · 2,588 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2023 SUV All Season Tyre Test (dry braking)

“Michelin Cross Climate 2 vs 2 SUV Hi I am looking at new tyres and am pretty convinced to go for the Michelin Cross Climates, but I am confused by the Cross Climate 2 vs the Cross Climate 2 SUV; they seem the same tyre, albeit the non-SUV version has better fuel economy, according to the EU Label system. I asked Michelin, but their response was meaningless: they just listed the same bullet points for each. Can anyone advise the difference, and do I need the SUV version? One car for these is a 2023 Skoda Kodiaq 2.0L TSI190 4x4 (well, the Volkswagen version of 4x4), tyre size 235/50/19. The other car is a 2019 Kia Sportage, which needs 225/60/17; in this car's case, it is just the non-SUV version available despite both cars being SUVs and of similar weights, albeit this car is a 1.6L 130hp. As a family, we have used winter tyres in the past, but since changing cars this year, we are thinking of switching to all seasons as we think they will suit us perfectly rather than switching tyres every April and November. Live in Lincolnshire. So we get all weathers ranging from -10 through to +35. Thanks for any and all advice. Paul Read more”

Vredestein Quatrac

Quatrac

All Season

± 4

Tests 81 · 18 tests Owners 78 · 1,596 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 30 in 2025 All Season 30 Tyre Braking Test (wet braking)

“Vredestein Quatrac and Hankook Kinergy 4S2 are good tyres. I prefer the vredestein quite comfortable tyres and quieter than the Hankook. But you can't go wrong with either of them.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 87

    Dry

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +6
    81
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2 SUVQuatrac
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 18 tests8683
    Reviews found online8878

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 85.9 + 40% × 88.2 = 87

    Quatrac: 60% × 82.9 + 40% × 77.7 = 81

  2. 84

    Wet

    Quatrac +7
    91
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2 SUVQuatrac
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 18 tests8495
    Reviews found online8585

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 84 + 40% × 84.7 = 84

    Quatrac: 60% × 94.7 + 40% × 85.4 = 91

  3. 90

    Snow

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +16
    74
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2 SUVQuatrac
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 13 tests9774
    Reviews found online8073

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 97.3 + 40% × 80.1 = 90

    Quatrac: 60% × 74.3 + 40% × 73 = 74

  4. 85

    Comfort

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +11
    74
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2 SUVQuatrac
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 3 tests8174
    Reviews found online8874

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 40% × 81 + 60% × 87.6 = 85

    Quatrac: 40% × 74.4 + 60% × 73.9 = 74

  5. 76

    Noise

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +3
    73
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2 SUVQuatrac
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 13 tests8278
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 81.7 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 76

    Quatrac: 60% × 78 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 73

    No owner ratings of noise for CrossClimate 2 SUV or Quatrac. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 70

    Treadwear

    Quatrac +5
    75
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2 SUVQuatrac
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests≈ 69 (est.)73
    Reviews found online7377

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.8 = 70

    Quatrac: 60% × 73.2 + 40% × 77 = 75

    No road tests of treadwear for CrossClimate 2 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 89

    Handling (owners)

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +13
    76
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2 SUVQuatrac
    Reviews found online8976
  8. 87

    Efficiency

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +14
    73
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2 SUVQuatrac
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 13 tests8773
Scores at a glance
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV vs Vredestein Quatrac: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin CrossClimate 2 SUVVredestein Quatrac
Relative Score 83 80
Dry 87 81
Wet 84 91
Snow 90 74
Comfort 85 74
Noise 76 73
Treadwear 70 75
Handling (owners) 89 76
Efficiency 87 73

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

CrossClimate 2 SUV

± 4

Quatrac

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryCrossClimate 2 SUVQuatracΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 100% #1/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 90% #8/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 83% #6/9 · 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 99% #2/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 – Different tests
Curved Aquaplaning Wet 87% #3/9 · 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 85% #5/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 100% #1/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 93% #6/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 99% #3/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 100% #1/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 – Different tests
Wet Circle Wet 97% #6/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 99% #3/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 83% #6/9 · 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 99% #2/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 – Different tests
Snow Braking Snow 100% #1/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 93% #7/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 – Different tests
Snow Circle Snow 100% #1/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 94% #8/15 · 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Snow Handling Snow 100% #1/9 · 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 99% #4/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 – Different tests
Snow Slalom Snow 100% #1/10 · 2023 SUV All Season Tyre Test 96% #4/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 – Different tests
Snow Traction Snow 100% #1/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 96% #4/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 – Different tests
Comfort (tester's mark) Comfort 100% #1/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 78% #5/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 – Different tests
Noise Noise 100% #3/9 · 2024 Motor SUV All Season Tyre Test 98% #6/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 – Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 90% #2/9 · 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 93% #3/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #1/7 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 #2/9 2027 Auto Motor und Sport Winter Tire Test R16 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A CrossClimate 2 SUV

Pros

  • Exceptional wet, ice, and snow traction that inspires winter-weather driving confidence
  • Significantly improved ride comfort and impact absorption over road imperfections
  • Impressive tread life and durability yielding long-term value

Cons

  • Higher initial purchase price compared to competitors
  • Minor fuel economy or range drop reported by some users, especially on hybrids and EVs
  • Occasional low-pitched or increased road noise at highway speeds (between 50-70 MPH)
All owner themes in the CrossClimate 2 SUV review

Tire B Quatrac

Pros

  • Exceptional wet-weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
  • Reliable year-round performance, including impressive grip in light to moderate snow and slush
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality on most road surfaces

Cons

  • Increased road noise or humming that can develop or worsen as the tires age
  • Faster-than-expected treadwear for some users, leading to shorter overall lifespan
  • Softer sidewalls that can feel slightly mushy during aggressive cornering or contribute to a wandering sensation at high speeds
All owner themes in the Quatrac review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

Positive

Community members generally view the Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV as a premium, dependable tire known for strong snow and dry performance, comfortable driving feel, and valuable 3PMS certification. Discussions frequently center around sizing availability, comparison to other models like the Primacy or standard CrossClimate 2, and choosing between specific speed or OEM ratings.

r/tires ·2 upvotes ·2025-07-10

“CrossClimate 2 SUV not offered in 245/60R18, what would be the closest alternative? I'm trying to buy the best tires for a family SUV (Ford Edge) driving in south-east USA. Being able to drive in very wet conditions (hydroplaning resistance) safely and comfort/quiet are high priorities. Ice/general handling are also important to me but less high-prio since we don't get a lot of snow and it's a family SUV that is mostly not driven spirited. Treadwear/Cost is lowest priority, I just want the safest option, but ideally it wouldn't wear out too fast, at least 40-50k miles if that's reasonable. I can't find any CrossClimate 2 SUV sets in this size and those would be my first choice. Is it better to just get regular CrossClimate 2's in that size or should I get the SUV oriented Pirelli Scorpion WeatherActive (this is what Tirerack is recommending me to get)? I've come to realize the CrossClimate 3's wont be here in time before the tires become too unsafe to drive on, which is extremely unfortunate timing.”

mbworld.org

“So here's the latest on Tires recommendations: (still dithering). Looking for smooth, soft ride, good mileage. I do have a mountain home; use ~30ish days during winter ski season, but mostly highway driving in Southern California ( don't disparage me for being a Californian. I cant stand the people or the government too lol. But it's a beautiful state). 2020 300GLC 4MATIC California car, 235/60 18H rating What will it be...?????? MICHELIN DEFENDER LTX M/S - seems like you guys are in favor. But hard to get. And the size is a 235/60 106T designation. Is the T speed max of 116mph not safe enough when OEM was an H rating 130mph? MICHELIN DEFENDER2. $238. Tire rack MICHELIN CrossClimate2 SUV tire rack $248. - hearing both good and bad. I heard they're soft and mileage tanks. Check out reviews on the Michelin USA official site. Pretty interesting. CONTINENTAL CROSSCONTACT LX25 $222. tire rack high rating? Also just got this from TireRack customer service CONTINENTAL EXTREMECONTACT DWS 06 PLUS. $238. Not sure, seems like TR is trying to promote them for Cont.”

chrforums.uk ·2 upvotes ·2024-06-04

“I have the Michelin Cross Climate 2 SUV tyres . The many reviews I read approved of their performance in snowy conditions (if that is an issue where you live) and also their dry condition performance. They supposedly have a decent life span. They felt nicer to drive on than the Primacy tyres . They weren't cheap at about £170 each fitted but will give me some insurance about snowy conditions and will hopefully last until I swap the car in about 3 years.”

Top themes
#snow and dry performance#speed and OEM ratings#tire size availability#comfort and driving feel#comparison with Primacy#SUV versus standard version

Based on 8 community posts

Tire B

Vredestein Quatrac

Positive

Community sentiment toward the Vredestein Quatrac is overwhelmingly positive, with drivers viewing it as one of the best mid-range all-weather tires available. Users frequently praise its reliable traction in wet and snowy conditions, along with its quiet and comfortable ride compared to rivals. While some owners note that stopping distances on ice or deep snow do not match dedicated winter tires and tread wear can vary, most consider it an exceptional value over premium brands like Michelin.

r/TyreReviews ·5 upvotes ·2026-09-25

“Vredestein Quatrac and Hankook Kinergy 4S2 are good tyres. I prefer the vredestein quite comfortable tyres and quieter than the Hankook. But you can't go wrong with either of them.”

r/tires ·1 upvote ·2026-05-18

“Vredestein Quatrac, General Altimax RT45, or Falken Sincera SN250's Hey all! Looking for 205/50/16 tires for my 2010 Honda Fit Sport in northern Ohio. I want to make sure I'm safe in the winter months, esp with Ohio's weird weather and snow/slush (I'm a newer driver). Don't have the storage or money for a dedicated winter set. Stuck between these three. RT45's appear to be the best all-rounder of the bunch (I wish Vredstein made the Quatrac Pro+ in a size I can use), but the Quatrac's have a slightly better snow rating. I drive relatively efficiently, don't go ham on the gas, and really just want a decent road feel while getting the best cost/performance ratio. The one thing biasing my decision right now is the $80 rebate I could get on the Quatracs, but I'd rather pay more for a better brand than suffer or be unsafe till I need to replace my tires again. Links to the tirerack pages I'm using to judge: Quatracs RT45s Sinceras Read more”

myoutlanderphev.com ·2018-03-15

“I had been looking at summer tires due to the fact the Toyo are too. Was looking at these: They get decent reviews The rolling restistance and grip are good too. It is rated as having better grip in the wet than the Vredestein Quatrac: Would have thought the all weather would have better wet grip? Will make a decision tomorrow. I'm in on west of Ireland coast. It's wet rarely icy here, snow would be extreme -only once got proper snow in the last 15 years - the beast from east! Cheers”

Top themes
#mid-range tire value#snow and winter performance#wet weather traction#quiet and comfortable ride#tread life longevity#all-weather capability

Based on 34 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV B · Vredestein Quatrac
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available3539
Rim diameters17″ – 22″15″ – 18″
UTQG—180 A B
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

Vredestein Quatrac

Narrow edge: Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV — better snow, efficiency and handling. Pick the Vredestein Quatrac if wet and treadwear matter most to you.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 90 vs 74 on snow.

Pick tire A You want lower fuel or energy use

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 87 vs 73 on efficiency.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 89 vs 76 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 85 vs 74 on comfort.

Tire A · Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
Tire B · Vredestein Quatrac

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

CrossClimate 2 SUV or Quatrac?

Which is better in the wet, CrossClimate 2 SUV or Quatrac?

Vredestein Quatrac, 91 vs 84 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, CrossClimate 2 SUV or Quatrac?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 87 vs 81 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, CrossClimate 2 SUV or Quatrac?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 90 vs 74 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, CrossClimate 2 SUV or Quatrac?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 76 vs 73 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, CrossClimate 2 SUV or Quatrac?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 85 vs 74 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, CrossClimate 2 SUV or Quatrac?

Vredestein Quatrac, 75 vs 70 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, CrossClimate 2 SUV or Quatrac?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 87 vs 73 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology