Head-to-head Updated

Falken FK510 SUV vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 3 + 1 road tests and 9 + 559 owner reviews. How we score

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV leads, 75–71 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken FK510 SUV
Tire AFalken

FK510 SUV

Summer

± 6

Tests 78 · 3 tests Owners 64 · 9 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test (dry braking)

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV
± 6

Tests 74 · 1 test Owners 78 · 559 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test (noise)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 75

    Dry

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV +1
    76
    Why this score
    SourceFK510 SUVEagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 1 tests8274
    Reviews found online6678

    FK510 SUV: 60% × 82 + 40% × 65.6 = 75

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV: 60% × 74.4 + 40% × 78.4 = 76

  2. 77

    Wet

    FK510 SUV +1
    76
    Why this score
    SourceFK510 SUVEagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 1 tests8174
    Reviews found online7279

    FK510 SUV: 60% × 81 + 40% × 71.8 = 77

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV: 60% × 74.1 + 40% × 79.3 = 76

  3. 61

    Comfort

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV +10
    71
    Why this score
    SourceFK510 SUVEagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests62≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6172

    FK510 SUV: 40% × 61.5 + 60% × 61 = 61

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV: 40% × 69.7 (est.) + 60% × 72.2 = 71

    No road tests of comfort for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 71

    Noise

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV +1
    72
    Why this score
    SourceFK510 SUVEagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 1 tests7476
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)

    FK510 SUV: 60% × 74.2 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 71

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV: 60% × 76.1 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 72

    No owner ratings of noise for FK510 SUV or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 59

    Treadwear

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV +14
    73
    Why this score
    SourceFK510 SUVEagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online5577

    FK510 SUV: 60% × 62.3 (est.) + 40% × 55.2 = 59

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 77.1 = 73

    No road tests of treadwear for FK510 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  6. 68

    Handling (owners)

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV +8
    76
    Why this score
    SourceFK510 SUVEagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV
    Reviews found online6876
  7. 44

    Efficiency

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV +19
    63
    Why this score
    SourceFK510 SUVEagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 1 tests4463
Scores at a glance
Falken FK510 SUV vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken FK510 SUVGoodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV
Relative Score 71 75
Dry 75 76
Wet 77 76
Comfort 61 71
Noise 71 72
Treadwear 59 73
Handling (owners) 68 76
Efficiency 44 63

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

FK510 SUV

± 6

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryFK510 SUVEagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUVΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 100% #1/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 97% #3/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 100% #1/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 100% #1/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 96% #6/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 96% #7/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 100% #1/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 94% #3/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 100% #1/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 98% #4/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Noise Noise 98% #10/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 100% #1/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 76% #10/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 81% #8/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 74% #7/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 65% #8/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Grass Traction Off-road 92% #9/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 85% #8/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Gravel Handling Off-road 100% #2/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 98% #8/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Gravel Traction Off-road 95% #3/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 99% #3/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Mud Traction Off-road 74% #10/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 91% #7/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Sand Traction Off-road 100% #1/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 97% #4/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall #3/10 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test #4/9 2020 Auto Bild Allrad SUV Summer Tire Test R18 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A FK510 SUV

Pros

  • Excellent value for money compared to top-tier premium brands
  • Quiet, compliant, and comfortable ride quality
  • Strong dry and wet handling with good feedback

Cons

  • Accelerated or uneven tread wear on certain vehicle setups
  • Reduced fuel economy (MPG)
  • Some users reported poor traction and slipping in wet or moisture conditions
All owner themes in the FK510 SUV review

Tire B Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and confidence-inspiring performance in both wet and dry conditions
  • Noticeably lower road noise and a smoother, more comfortable ride compared to competitors
  • Improved steering response and precise handling capabilities

Cons

  • Poor performance and lack of traction in snow and wintry conditions
  • Increased rolling resistance leading to a slight drop in fuel economy or EV efficiency for some users
  • Susceptibility to varying road surface textures, which can occasionally alter cabin noise levels
All owner themes in the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken FK510 SUV B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available4844
Rim diameters17″ – 22″17″ – 22″
Tread depth—8 - 9/32″
UTQG—240 - 300 A - AA A
Treadwear warranty—50,000 mi
Sidewall—Black Side Wall - Raised Black Lettering
Max pressure—50 - 51 psi
Sizes in common2424

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken FK510 SUV

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV

Narrow edge: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV — better efficiency, treadwear and comfort. Where the Falken FK510 SUV is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.

Pick tire B You want lower fuel or energy use

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV scores 63 vs 44 on efficiency.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV scores 73 vs 59 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV scores 71 vs 61 on comfort.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV scores 76 vs 68 on handling.

Tire A · Falken FK510 SUV
Tire B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

FK510 SUV or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV?

Which is better in the wet, FK510 SUV or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV?

Neither, by our numbers: 77 vs 76 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, FK510 SUV or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV?

Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 76 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, FK510 SUV or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV?

Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 72 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, FK510 SUV or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV, 71 vs 61 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, FK510 SUV or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV, 73 vs 59 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, FK510 SUV or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV, 63 vs 44 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology